November 29th, 2024

For the love of God, make your own website

The article highlights the decline of personal websites due to social media's corporate dominance, advocating for a return to independent websites to reclaim online expression and support free media.

Read original articleLink Icon
For the love of God, make your own website

The article discusses the decline of personal websites and the rise of social media platforms, which have become dominated by corporate interests. The author reflects on the joy of creating personal websites in the past, highlighting how platforms like Geocities and Angelfire allowed for individual expression and creativity. However, the shift to social media has led to a loss of this freedom, as users are now subject to the whims of tech billionaires who control these platforms. The author argues for a return to independent websites, emphasizing the importance of having control over one's online presence and content. This shift is seen as crucial for protecting free expression and creating alternatives to the monopolistic tech ecosystem. The piece concludes with a call to action for individuals to build their own websites and support independent media, thereby reclaiming the internet as a space for personal expression and community.

- The rise of social media has diminished the prevalence of personal websites.

- Users are increasingly subject to the control of tech billionaires on social media platforms.

- There is a growing need for independent websites to protect free expression.

- Building personal websites can empower individuals and foster creativity.

- Supporting independent media is essential for creating alternatives to corporate-controlled platforms.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @thepuppet33r - 5 months
The biggest problem with people making their own websites is: 1) It's more effort and time than most people are willing to deal with, when instead they can create an account on Bluesky in seconds, and immediately begin sharing their opinions. This means that the slant of opinions from people who make their own websites will inevitably skew more techy. 2) Most people don't view the content they are producing to need a website. It's great if you're writing short or long-form content or obsessed with a particular thing (like the three website examples listed in the article). But for the average Joe, a website feels unnecessary.

I feel like what's missing in this discussion is that as much as I hate Facebook and Twitter (X), they enabled people who otherwise would never have been able to participate in the global discussion to have immediate access to do so. There isn't a good way to parlay that ease of use and immediate connection into individual websites. If all of my friends made their own websites tomorrow, I wouldn't visit them all daily like I read their posts on Mastodon.

Maybe the solution is to accept that most people don't need to be posting their opinions out in the ether? Other than here, I rarely post online.

By @lifeisstillgood - 5 months
The idea that social Media is enabling constrained self expression is interesting - or that people who are illiterate in a literate world have limited self expression.
By @123yawaworht456 - 5 months
>After the election, users left the Elon Musk-owned platform in droves, unwilling to centralize the way they talk to people online around this one website.

>...

>Unfortunately, this is what all of the internet is right now: social media, owned by large corporations that make changes to them to limit or suppress your speech, in order to make themselves more attractive to advertisers or just pursue their owners’ ends.

twitter emigre were fine with centralization of power, suppression of speech, and appeasement of advertisers just a few years ago, back when Ministry of Trust and Safety commissars were on-call 24x7 to suppress speech they didn't like and summarily unperson the offenders.