December 5th, 2024

Boeing Plea Deal over Fatal 737 MAX Crashes Rejected by Judge

A federal judge has rejected Boeing's plea deal to avoid criminal prosecution over the 737 Max crashes, influenced by victims' families' objections and concerns about oversight and hiring practices.

Read original articleLink Icon
Boeing Plea Deal over Fatal 737 MAX Crashes Rejected by Judge

A federal judge has rejected Boeing's plea deal aimed at avoiding criminal prosecution related to two fatal 737 Max crashes. US District Judge Reed O’Connor made this decision after considering the objections from the families of the crash victims, who sought greater oversight of Boeing's operations. The judge criticized the proposed settlement for including provisions that would require race to be a factor in hiring an independent monitor, and he expressed concerns about his limited role in ensuring Boeing's compliance with the agreement. This ruling complicates Boeing's efforts to recover from the scandals surrounding the crashes, which have significantly impacted the company's reputation and operations.

- Boeing's plea deal to avoid criminal prosecution has been rejected by a federal judge.

- The decision was influenced by objections from families of the crash victims.

- The judge criticized provisions in the deal related to hiring practices for an independent monitor.

- The ruling may prolong Boeing's recovery from past scandals associated with the 737 Max crashes.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @hx8 - 5 months
Boeing is becoming a national embarrassment. We discuss this ad nauseam every time a post about them makes it to the front page. I think this is a sign that their reputation is beginning to be worth less, and more people in the system are going to be more critical. This one case won't penalize Boeing enough that they return to a more quality focused culture. Maybe there aren't enough legal penalties to do so. I wish I could see a feasible path to Boeing redemption.
By @duxup - 5 months
>O’Connor said the settlement’s provisions for choosing an independent monitor improperly required considering the race of the person appointed and minimized his role in the process.

How did considering the race of the person appointed even come up?

I can't imagine either side thinking there was some kind of advantage to doing so?

By @nis0s - 5 months
Boeing took a nose dive in standards and quality when they replaced people who understood engineering and product fundamentals with bottom-line focused MBAs. I hope Boeing serves as a cautionary tale for other companies, most others are not “too big to fail”.
By @impish9208 - 5 months