December 12th, 2024

Schrödinger's Cat and Heisenberg's Cut

Schrödinger's Cat illustrates quantum superposition, raising philosophical questions about existence. The article discusses Heisenberg's cut, many-worlds interpretation, and the ongoing complexity of quantum theory without definitive answers.

Read original articleLink Icon
Schrödinger's Cat and Heisenberg's Cut

Schrödinger's Cat, a thought experiment proposed by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935, illustrates the peculiarities of quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of superposition. In this scenario, a cat is placed in a sealed box with a radioactive atom that has a 50% chance of decaying, which would trigger a mechanism to kill the cat. Until the box is opened, the cat is considered to be in a superposition of being both alive and dead. This paradox has been popularized in culture, especially since the 1960s, and raises philosophical questions about existence and observation. The article also discusses Heisenberg's cut, which refers to the transition from quantum to classical physics, and the ongoing debates among physicists regarding the interpretation of quantum mechanics. While some, like Niels Bohr, view quantum states as mere tools for prediction, others, including Schrödinger and Einstein, argue for a more concrete understanding of quantum phenomena. The discussion extends to the implications of choices and alternate realities, as seen in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that every decision creates a branching of realities. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the complexity and mystery surrounding quantum theory, highlighting that it does not provide definitive answers to many fundamental questions.

- Schrödinger's Cat illustrates the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics.

- The thought experiment raises philosophical questions about existence and observation.

- Heisenberg's cut marks the transition from quantum to classical physics.

- The many-worlds interpretation suggests multiple realities based on choices.

- Quantum theory remains complex and does not provide clear answers to fundamental questions.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @K0balt - 4 months
Just because we intuit that something seems absurd does not mean it is. What is at odds with nature seems to me to be our intuition.

Our measurements of the subject seem fairly clear. The double slit experiment works, and scales to larger and larger particles with improvements in experimental rigor.

We observe Casimir pressure, and we observe changes in that pressure based on probabilistic constraints that we place or remove in the vicinity of the detector.

We observe reduced certainty of observations as they become distant in spacetime.

All of these point in one direction-that our intuition on observing things is much less predictive than we tend to imagine.

Whether that means multiverse, simulation, unlimited reach of wave function, holographic universe, or one of the other many possible explanations has yet to be established, but there is no indication that classical physics is reconcilable with observation.

By @GoblinSlayer - 4 months
>In truth, we don’t know what the state of the electron really is, or how to describe its real physical situation. But if we represent this state as a superposition, we know we will get predictions consistent with experiment.

If electron behaves according to superposition, maybe superposition describes the real physical situation, why not? Antipods, length contraction and homeopathic infections were thought as absurd too because they didn't match traditional memes, now we have yet another presumably absurd concept. Everything new is just forgotten old.