Taylor Swift is not Mary Shelley
Henry Oliver critiques the comparison between Taylor Swift and Mary Shelley, arguing that Shelley's groundbreaking contributions to literature and philosophy, particularly in science fiction, surpass Swift's popular but less original work.
Read original article
The article critiques the assertion made by literature professor Matthew Green that Taylor Swift's gothic work is as significant as Mary Shelley's novels, particularly "Frankenstein." The author, Henry Oliver, argues that while Swift is a talented artist, her contributions do not equate to Shelley's groundbreaking achievements in literature and philosophy. He emphasizes that Shelley engaged with contemporary scientific and philosophical ideas, creating a profound narrative that addressed critical societal questions of her time. In contrast, Oliver contends that Swift's work, while drawing on gothic and romantic themes, lacks the same depth and originality. He highlights that Shelley invented the science fiction genre and her work remains relevant in discussions about modernity and ethics, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence. Oliver criticizes the tendency to equate popular music with literary innovation, asserting that such comparisons diminish the historical significance of Shelley's contributions. He calls for a recognition of the distinct achievements of both artists, urging educational institutions to accurately convey the importance of Shelley's work to students.
- The comparison between Taylor Swift and Mary Shelley is deemed inappropriate by Henry Oliver.
- Mary Shelley is credited with inventing the science fiction genre and engaging with contemporary scientific ideas.
- Oliver argues that Swift's work, while popular, lacks the depth and originality of Shelley's contributions.
- The article emphasizes the need for educational institutions to accurately represent literary history.
- Oliver critiques the trend of equating popular music with significant literary achievements.
Related
What Lasts and (Mostly) Doesn't Last
Lincoln Michel discusses the fleeting nature of literary fame, emphasizing that enduring works often rely on dedicated advocates and that popularity in other media may not ensure lasting relevance.
The Atlantic Did Me Dirty
Carrie M. Santo-Thomas critiques the oversimplified view that standardized testing causes college students' reading struggles, advocating for diverse literature and teaching methods that inspire a love for reading.
All Possible Plots by Major Authors
The article humorously critiques the similarities in plots among major authors, providing satirical summaries that highlight common themes while inviting appreciation for their unique styles and playful tone.
Henry James and H.G. Wells (1958)
The commentary contrasts H.G. Wells's socially aware, humorous writing with Henry James's pretentious style, arguing Wells's novels explore human relationships while James's characters lack authenticity and depth.
Stranger Than Fiction: Lives of the Twentieth-Century Novel
Edwin Frank's "Stranger Than Fiction" examines twentieth-century novels' innovations, cultural significance, and relevance, while questioning their insights on war and self-awareness, and calling for diverse literary perspectives.
1 commentsRelated
What Lasts and (Mostly) Doesn't Last
Lincoln Michel discusses the fleeting nature of literary fame, emphasizing that enduring works often rely on dedicated advocates and that popularity in other media may not ensure lasting relevance.
The Atlantic Did Me Dirty
Carrie M. Santo-Thomas critiques the oversimplified view that standardized testing causes college students' reading struggles, advocating for diverse literature and teaching methods that inspire a love for reading.
All Possible Plots by Major Authors
The article humorously critiques the similarities in plots among major authors, providing satirical summaries that highlight common themes while inviting appreciation for their unique styles and playful tone.
Henry James and H.G. Wells (1958)
The commentary contrasts H.G. Wells's socially aware, humorous writing with Henry James's pretentious style, arguing Wells's novels explore human relationships while James's characters lack authenticity and depth.
Stranger Than Fiction: Lives of the Twentieth-Century Novel
Edwin Frank's "Stranger Than Fiction" examines twentieth-century novels' innovations, cultural significance, and relevance, while questioning their insights on war and self-awareness, and calling for diverse literary perspectives.