January 11th, 2025

TikTok Says It Will 'Go Dark' Without US Court Intervention

TikTok will cease U.S. operations if the Supreme Court does not extend the January 19 divestment deadline, arguing that divesting from ByteDance is complex and time-consuming.

Read original articleLink Icon
TikTok Says It Will 'Go Dark' Without US Court Intervention

TikTok has announced that it will "go dark" in the United States if the Supreme Court does not intervene by extending a divestment deadline set for January 19. The company argues that if its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, does not divest its U.S. operations by this date, its partners, including app stores and service providers, will cease their collaboration, effectively shutting down the app. During oral arguments at the Supreme Court, TikTok's attorney emphasized that the law would prevent the app from being downloaded and would likely block existing users from accessing videos. TikTok has been challenging a divest-or-ban law that mandates ByteDance to separate from TikTok's U.S. operations within nine months or face a ban. After losing a case in the District of Columbia Circuit, TikTok is seeking an emergency injunction from the Supreme Court to pause the divestment deadline, arguing that the process of divesting is extraordinarily complex and time-consuming.

- TikTok plans to cease operations in the U.S. if the Supreme Court does not extend the divestment deadline.

- The divest-or-ban law requires ByteDance to separate from TikTok's U.S. operations within nine months.

- TikTok's attorney stated that partners would stop working with the app if the divestment is not completed.

- The company is seeking an emergency injunction from the Supreme Court to pause the divestment deadline.

- A shutdown would prevent both new downloads and access for existing users.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @ironyman - 3 months
Two interesting things can be infered from this:

1. TikTok would literally rather shut itself off from its largest market, than divest its ownership from PRC; says a lot about who's really in control here.

2. They really believe they have an edge in their algorithm that they would rather go dark than divulge it.

Tiktok's tentative US buyers (probably a consortium led by Steve Mnuchin or Jeff Yass) says there is no way the Chinese have the technological edge here and US engineers can successfully replicate it so I lean towards no. 1.

By @wtcactus - 3 months
Good. The fact that TikTok has basically two different apps. One showing pedagogical content in China, and another fine tuned for disinformation and dissent they show in the west, tells me they are a tool from the Chinese oppressive government to undermine democratic countries.

I’m glad they are about to be shut down.

https://www.deseret.com/2022/11/24/23467181/difference-betwe...

By @csomar - 3 months
By @andyjohnson0 - 3 months
Trump has stated that he's against this ban. But my working assumption is that Meta's recent announcements around moderation, diversity, and new execs are a quid pro quo for Trump supporting to the ban in office.