February 1st, 2025

Over 90% of U.S. airport towers are understaffed, data shows

Over 90% of U.S. airport towers are understaffed, with less than 10% meeting FAA standards. The COVID-19 pandemic has worsened recruitment, leading to a shortage of 3,000 to 4,000 controllers.

Read original articleLink Icon
Over 90% of U.S. airport towers are understaffed, data shows

A recent analysis by CBS News reveals that over 90% of U.S. airport towers are understaffed, with less than 10% meeting the air traffic controller staffing standards set by a working group that includes the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the controllers' union. This issue has gained attention following a tragic midair collision near Reagan National Airport that resulted in 67 fatalities, where only one air traffic controller was on duty instead of the usual two. The analysis indicates that only about 2% of airport towers met the 2024 staffing targets for fully-trained controllers, and only 8% met the target when including trainees. Nationwide, the FAA's target for controllers is approximately 14,600, but the current staffing level is about 72% of that target for fully-trained controllers and 87% when including trainees. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted recruitment and training efforts, leading to a shortage of 3,000 to 4,000 controllers. The FAA's report highlights that while 45% of airport towers meet its internal staffing standards for fully-trained controllers, this figure rises to 59% when including trainees. The National Air Traffic Controllers Association has expressed concerns about the long timeline required to train new hires, indicating that even if 2,000 new controllers were hired immediately, only about 1,000 would be certified in two to three years.

- Over 90% of U.S. airport towers are understaffed.

- Less than 10% of towers meet FAA staffing standards.

- The COVID-19 pandemic has hindered recruitment and training efforts.

- The FAA's target for air traffic controllers is approximately 14,600.

- A recent midair collision has raised concerns about air traffic control staffing levels.

Link Icon 16 comments
By @sylware - 3 months
If they are understaff (namely giga honest, super solid competent people for air traffic ground control), you have to reduce air traffic as it is way too dangerous.

For this kind of staff, it is not just a matter of "training", it is way more demanding.

By @tayo42 - 3 months
Feel like I'm having deja vu in away. Didn't this exact problem blow up a couple years ago?
By @verzali - 3 months
The big question every one seems to be ignoring is whether air travel in the US should now be considered dangerous. If ATC is understaffed or filled with unqualified people, then how is any flight safe? Why would anyone get on a plane unless they really have to and have no other option?
By @gotoeleven - 3 months
Please just entertain a hypothetical: If it turns out that the FAA was hiring much more slowly than it needed to be because it was unable to reach its DEI goals, can we all agree that we should stop doing DEI for important things?
By @kylehotchkiss - 3 months
Why are they not being trained for free after passing aptitude tests? It sounded like people still needed to pay for their college to even get to the ATC specific training.
By @blantonl - 3 months
If there is one thing I've learned in the past few days, acutely so, is that the vast majority of people do not understand the sheer complexity of what it takes to have an aviation industry.
By @tomohawk - 3 months
Hundreds of qualified applicants were denied jobs through a "Biographical Assessment" that you can take yourself:

https://kaisoapbox.com/projects/faa_biographical_assessment/

Spend a bit of time taking it and it's clear what at least one reason for this shortage is.

By @cubano - 3 months
I find it almost completely mind boggling that with all the breathless new coverage on the "incredible shortage of qualified tower personnel", I have yet to hear even one mention of what I find to be the elephant in the room.

Uhhh...why not use AI to start controlling the airports and airplanes? Talk about an app that, to me at least, seems an almost trivial use of its abilities and I'm sure that an AI could be trained in a very short period of time that could outperform a roomful of overaged, distracted humans...right?

Yes of course there is no way I'm the first to think of this...but just the fact that here it is day 3 or so, and literally NOT ONE MENTION ANYWHERE in the media about the potential for AI to safely land and direct all these flying things.

By @cozzyd - 3 months
Those personnel numbers don't really make sense to me. Like, sure I believe O'Hare has 57 trained ATC staff, but Kalamazoo has 47 while La Guardia has 29, all at comparable percentages of trained staffing. Something is off...

It's good to see that both Chicago airports are at full staffing though (when counting staff in training ).

By @silexia - 3 months
The far left air traffic controllers union has negotiated many ridiculous restrictions and absurdly high pay rates, causing a major problem in staffing.
By @devit - 3 months
Seems like it can be at least mostly automated.
By @linuxftw - 3 months
It seems like there are shortages in every field according to the media. Shortage in tech workers, shortage in doctors and nurses, shortage of air traffic controllers. Shortages all around.

Here's how to instantly cure shortages of ATCs: Each airline is responsible for staffing N ATCs per scheduled flight at a given airport, calculated on a yearly basis.

By @Avicebron - 3 months
Ok? So we have tons of US citizens who want to be in high-skilled high-paying professions, bring more people into training programs and staff them? I assume people working high skilled high wage professions spend more on things like housing and food and other things -> economy boost. Where is the hangup?
By @buckle8017 - 3 months
It would probably have helped if they didn't turn away thousands of qualified white male candidates.

Instead of simply biasing their hiring based on race. The FAA brilliantly denied anybody who scored too low on their "compatibility" matrix, presumably as a legal dodge.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/faa-embroiled-in-lawsuit-a...