February 1st, 2025

National Science Foundation freezes payments in response to executive orders

The National Science Foundation has frozen existing grant payments and halted new applications due to Trump administration actions on diversity initiatives, causing financial difficulties and uncertainty for researchers and universities.

Read original articleLink Icon
National Science Foundation freezes payments in response to executive orders

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has frozen payments for all existing grants and halted the review of new applications in response to executive actions from the Trump administration targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This freeze affects numerous researchers, including postdoctoral biologist Julia Van Etten, who relies on NSF funding for her work and living expenses. The NSF's decision comes despite the White House's rescinding of a memo that called for a pause in federal grant spending. The agency's actions are based on the requirement that all grantees comply with the executive orders, which may conflict with the NSF's congressional mandate to broaden participation in science. This situation has created confusion among universities regarding their legal obligations and funding management. Some institutions are advising researchers to continue their work unless explicitly instructed otherwise, while others have paused non-personnel spending. The funding freeze is expected to have significant repercussions on ongoing research, with scientists expressing concerns about the potential delays and impacts on their work. The NSF is currently reviewing billions of dollars in grants to identify those related to DEI, and funding is unlikely to resume until this review is complete.

- NSF has frozen payments for existing grants and halted new applications due to Trump administration's DEI executive actions.

- Researchers are facing financial difficulties as they cannot access funds for living expenses and research.

- Universities are uncertain about their legal exposure and how to manage federal grant funding.

- The freeze could delay important scientific research and hinder progress in various fields.

- NSF's review of grants related to DEI may prolong the funding freeze.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @duxup - 2 months
>This presents a huge challenge to the NSF. The CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 has several provisions tied to NSF that explicitly require it to broaden participation in science, and earlier laws governing the foundation have similar language. That means that in addition to weighing the intellectual merit of proposals, NSF must consider how the research it funds will expand "participation of women and individuals from underrepresented groups" in science — something studies show leads to more productive science.

So the order in this case violates the law?

But who can defend the law if the department is staffed by loyalists, and there's a broader effort to filter out anyone "disloyal"?

By @coldcode - 2 months
If you don't fund science, you give the world to other countries, especially China. If you only fund science that makes immediate profits, you never get them, as the foundation does not exist, and the researchers never learn enough to discover anything anyway.

Science, engineering, medicine and technology do not invent themselves. It takes people, sometimes for decades, to make it happen overnight. If you spend nothing, you get nothing. I guess nothing is now the plan.