ICE Wants to Know If You're Posting Negative Things About It Online
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to monitor social media for negative comments, aiming to identify threats against personnel, raising concerns about free speech and potential unjust targeting of individuals.
Read original articleU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is seeking contractors to monitor social media for negative discussions about the agency and its officials, citing an increase in threats against its personnel. The agency's procurement documents indicate that it aims to identify and assess potential threats, including those stemming from online criticism. The monitoring will involve analyzing social media sentiment, with a focus on negative references to ICE, and may lead to further investigation of individuals flagged as suspicious. This includes gathering personal information and employing facial recognition technology to identify users. Critics, including civil liberties advocates, express concern that this initiative could infringe on free speech rights and create a chilling effect on public discourse. They argue that the program reflects a broader trend of mass surveillance and could lead to unjust targeting of individuals based on their online expressions. The initiative is seen as part of ICE's ongoing efforts to enhance its security measures, which have been criticized for their implications on civil liberties.
- ICE plans to monitor social media for negative comments about the agency.
- The initiative aims to identify potential threats to ICE personnel and facilities.
- Critics warn that this could infringe on free speech and lead to unjust targeting.
- The program may involve gathering extensive personal information on flagged individuals.
- This monitoring effort is part of a broader trend of mass surveillance practices.
Related
AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say
The UK Home Office's AI tool for immigration enforcement faces criticism for potentially unjust automated decisions, bias, and lack of transparency, prompting calls for its withdrawal from advocates for migrant rights.
Government Monitoring Those with "Negative" Views of Health Insurance Companies
Following the murder of UnitedHealthcare's CEO, negative sentiment towards health insurers increased on social media, prompting government monitoring and health insurers to remove executive information, raising free speech concerns.
The Tech Arsenal That Could Power Trump's Immigration Crackdown
The Trump administration plans to enhance immigration enforcement using advanced surveillance technologies, having spent $7.8 billion since 2020, raising privacy concerns while increasing demand for such solutions.
US immigration is gaming Google to create a mirage of mass deportations
ICE has manipulated Google search results by updating timestamps on old press releases, misleading the public about recent deportations and creating fear in immigrant communities, prompting local law enforcement to address misinformation.
US immigration is gaming Google to create a mirage of mass deportations
ICE has manipulated Google search results by updating timestamps on old press releases, misleading the public about deportations and creating fear in immigrant communities, raising ethical concerns about transparency.
What's up with all of the "partial" if they have your SSN, they have you. This is the lamest attempt at whatever the fuck they are attempting. Why can't they just say they are doxxing anyone who has anything negative to say about <insertRecipientOfComplaints> as they continue to be the eye of sauron?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36435498 ("LexisNexis is selling personal data to ICE so it can try to predict crimes" (2023), 114 comments)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26672613 ("LexisNexis to Provide Giant Database of Personal Information to ICE" (2021), 26 comments)
Please enter your email to continue reading...
So yea ICE can suck a fuck.
What's going on behind the scenes? Does this align more with any of the following three, or perhaps something else?
1. They claim they're getting enough death threats to warrant a proactive search. Maybe that's just a lie, and this is a power grab.
2. The internet has a lot of people giving death threats and other despicable behavior without cause. If that's you, please stop. ICE would be overreacting by taking that seriously though.
3. Is ICE performing enough atrocities that they're creating people legitimately interested in using violence to stop them? If so, taking a step back to reflect on your life choices seems like a healthier option than ramping up the likelihood of committing those atrocities.
Fortunately I don't have to worry about the morons, cowards, and completely useless trash at ICE_- apparently my negative comment scares them into whining about people saying mean things. I wish they have a really really shitty day - the fools at ICE that is.
does this get me on the list?
> ICE wants to know if you're posting negative things about it online (theintercept.com)
Nope. If you actually read (you know, it's not that hard, it's like that thing you do when you do leetcode? Give it a try, it's not that difficult!) the document ("25517962-statement-of-objectives"), you can see that it clearly states that it's only looking for threats against ICE employees or facilities. (The chuckleheads posting "fuck Ice" in the comments here are fine. But they knew that...)
> It’s unclear how exactly any contractor might sniff out someone’s “proclivity for violence.”
The intercept should stop playing stupid, it's a bad look. Hasn't sentiment analysis been around for 20+ years now? Get with the times, grandpa!
> In addition to compiling personal information — such as the Social Security numbers
Yeah that's under a section that starts: "The Contractor shall provide public records details on the individual, as available". If your Facebook account uses your real name, and your real name is rare enough that it can be matched to a public SSN database, guess what? You'll never guess. It's craazay!
You can bellyache all day about getting downvoted on reddit or flagged on here, but when the government is trying to target people for dissent, that's when we're actually into territory the founding fathers were scared of.
On one hand, someone should tell whoever is in charge of this edict that it is probably not a good idea. It is likely to backfire, and the harder you double down, the worse it will get. Public opinion will probably turn negative quickly, as you will wind up coming off as petty and insecure.
On the other hand, the last time we saw a large scale misunderstanding of how to deal with the Internet like this was probably the COVID-19 snitching hotlines, so realistically we're just about due for another one.
Not saying it'll all be fun and games but it might be popcorn time.
Land of the free and freedom of speech, yeah sure.
We got "omg silicon valley" in government, overreaching security services, weird sort of banned words work going on ...
Related
AI tool could influence Home Office immigration decisions, critics say
The UK Home Office's AI tool for immigration enforcement faces criticism for potentially unjust automated decisions, bias, and lack of transparency, prompting calls for its withdrawal from advocates for migrant rights.
Government Monitoring Those with "Negative" Views of Health Insurance Companies
Following the murder of UnitedHealthcare's CEO, negative sentiment towards health insurers increased on social media, prompting government monitoring and health insurers to remove executive information, raising free speech concerns.
The Tech Arsenal That Could Power Trump's Immigration Crackdown
The Trump administration plans to enhance immigration enforcement using advanced surveillance technologies, having spent $7.8 billion since 2020, raising privacy concerns while increasing demand for such solutions.
US immigration is gaming Google to create a mirage of mass deportations
ICE has manipulated Google search results by updating timestamps on old press releases, misleading the public about recent deportations and creating fear in immigrant communities, prompting local law enforcement to address misinformation.
US immigration is gaming Google to create a mirage of mass deportations
ICE has manipulated Google search results by updating timestamps on old press releases, misleading the public about deportations and creating fear in immigrant communities, raising ethical concerns about transparency.