February 19th, 2025

USDA fired officials working on bird flu, now trying to rehire them

The USDA mistakenly terminated employees crucial to the H5N1 avian flu response and is working to rehire them amid concerns about the impact on public safety and poultry losses.

Read original articleLink Icon
USDA fired officials working on bird flu, now trying to rehire them

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that it mistakenly terminated several employees involved in the federal response to the H5N1 avian flu outbreak. The agency is working to reverse these firings swiftly, emphasizing the importance of these positions for public safety and food supply. The USDA spokesperson stated that the agency continues to prioritize its response to the highly pathogenic avian influenza, which has significantly impacted poultry flocks and driven up egg prices. The recent layoffs have raised concerns among Republican lawmakers, who fear that such cuts could hinder the government's ability to combat the bird flu effectively. The USDA has faced criticism for its lack of communication regarding the layoffs, which have also affected researchers working on avian flu. The situation is compounded by the broader context of mass firings across the federal government under the Trump administration, which has been criticized for its approach to workforce reductions. As of now, 151 confirmed flocks have been affected, impacting 23 million birds, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported 68 human cases of the virus in the U.S.

- USDA accidentally fired officials working on bird flu response.

- The agency is attempting to rehire the terminated employees.

- Concerns raised by lawmakers about the impact of layoffs on avian flu efforts.

- The bird flu outbreak has led to significant poultry losses and rising egg prices.

- The situation reflects broader workforce reductions under the Trump administration.

Link Icon 13 comments
By @stephen_g - 2 months
This whole thing seems like such a farce... The conservative side of politics in Australia likes to do a much smaller version of this to "save money" whenever they've been in opposition and then get back in to Government - and all it leads to every time is paying far more to have the same work done by the big consulting companies.

You hear stories like people being fired from their public service jobs, then being hired by the consulting firm and being back the next week, now with the consulting firm charging more than double what they were paid before for their time - and they're doing the exact same job they were doing...

By @trhway - 2 months
it reminds how about 20 years ago at Sun Microsystems they laid off several hundreds in one org with intention to rehire back pick-and-choosing ~100 best. Fail. Pretty much everybody took the package and went onto better pastures, especially the best ones.
By @dashundchen - 2 months
What a clown show. After they made the same fuck up firing the inspectors of our nuclear weapons.

> The layoffs concerned a number of Republican lawmakers, who privately warned the Trump administration that such cuts could hamper the government’s bird flu response and asked them to reconsider, according to two Republican sources with direct knowledge of the situation.

This is so infuriating - "privately". You know a good chunk of Republicans in Congress are educated people aware these many of these cuts are a mix of illegal, unconstitutional or dangerous to national security. But for the sake of their reelection campaign two years from now they're rolling over and ceding any oversight authority they have.

Show a spine, if you're going to give all your Branch's power to a dictator you might as well let DOGE dissolve congress and save us the salaries.

By @etchalon - 2 months
Apparently Musk thinks his "cut everything and then see what we really need" approach was successful at Twitter, despite revenue being down, usage down, and numerous competitors appearing which are decimating its user base.

But hey, the site is still running. So, success.

By @zombiwoof - 2 months
The smugness of silicon valley meets the inefficiency of big government

What could go wrong

By @ProfessorZoom - 2 months
if you aren't re-adding, then you're not deleting enough
By @unyttigfjelltol - 2 months
You'd think from all Elon Musk's press with DOGE that this is his only job. But he's actually simultaneously CEO of 4 major companies, which explains how he's spread a bit too thin to correctly supervise the "Big Balls" layoff machine.
By @spwa4 - 2 months
Do what consultants do "you fired me (or rescinded my contract)? You want me back? Not a problem! I will charge double (you will pay me double), of course"

I got a "yes" to this twice. One of those, double the pay I was hired for for 2 years.

You'd think they'd get better at this. How many times has Trump/Musk made idiotic decisions to fire people? The nuclear safety inspectors (and rumored, some nuclear weapons experts) they fired was ... last week?

https://time.com/7225798/doge-fires-national-nuclear-securit...

Morons.

By @Jiro - 2 months
If you read the wording of this article carefully it says that the employees were fired in error. By referring to several different firings and by juxtaposing statements, the article tries to give the impression that Trump's rules demanded that they be fired and that Trump then had to change his mind, but it doesn't say that. Don't believe it when articles insinuate more than they actually say.
By @suraci - 2 months
This happened multiple times over the course of a few days, and it makes me think, what's the pattern behind it?

My guess is, departments don't want layoffs, but they don't want to contradict the higher-ups either, so they fire and rehire.

this can work because DOGE only has administrative power and cannot decide the budget, only those who can decide on departmental budgets truly have the power to influence the size of the department

btw, i just found this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zfzCjHCTmo