March 20th, 2025

Oxygen discovered in most distant known galaxy

Astronomers detected oxygen in the distant galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0, 13.4 billion light-years away, suggesting it is more chemically mature than expected, challenging theories on galaxy formation and evolution.

Read original articleLink Icon
CuriositySkepticismFascination
Oxygen discovered in most distant known galaxy

Astronomers have detected oxygen in the most distant known galaxy, JADES-GS-z14-0, using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA). This galaxy, discovered last year, is located 13.4 billion light-years away, allowing scientists to observe it as it existed when the Universe was less than 300 million years old. The presence of oxygen suggests that JADES-GS-z14-0 is more chemically mature than previously anticipated, containing about ten times more heavy elements than expected for a galaxy of its age. This finding challenges existing theories about galaxy formation, indicating that galaxies may evolve more rapidly than previously thought. The oxygen detection has also improved distance measurements to the galaxy, achieving a precision of 0.005 percent. This collaboration between ALMA and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) highlights the importance of using multiple observational tools to enhance our understanding of early galaxy evolution. The results from two separate studies will be published in The Astrophysical Journal and Astronomy & Astrophysics, contributing to a growing body of evidence that galaxies formed and matured much faster in the early Universe than previously believed.

- Oxygen has been detected in the most distant known galaxy, JADES-GS-z14-0.

- The galaxy is located 13.4 billion light-years away, observed as it was 300 million years after the Big Bang.

- JADES-GS-z14-0 contains about ten times more heavy elements than expected for its age.

- The findings suggest galaxies may form and mature more rapidly than previously thought.

- The collaboration between ALMA and JWST enhances the precision of distance measurements to distant galaxies.

AI: What people are saying
The discovery of oxygen in the distant galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0 has sparked a variety of reactions among commenters.
  • Many commenters express skepticism about the significance of finding oxygen, suggesting it is expected in distant galaxies.
  • Some highlight the implications of this finding for our understanding of galaxy formation and the early universe.
  • There are discussions about the methods used to detect oxygen and the confidence in the results.
  • Several commenters emphasize the abundance of oxygen and hydrogen in the universe, questioning the surprise over this discovery.
  • Criticism is directed at those who second-guess scientists and the research process.
Link Icon 17 comments
By @PaulHoule - about 1 month
It fits the theme that, according to Webb, the universe developed a lot more quickly in what we think were the first billion years... Most likely the "first billion years" were more like five billion years.
By @divbzero - about 1 month
So either our understanding of nucleosynthesis is incomplete or the universe is older than we think.

Which one is more likely? Are there assumptions or parameters in our model for the age of the universe that could be inaccurate?

By @ck2 - about 1 month
Note the theory in this release is the oxygen is from a mature star releasing heavier elements, not plant life.

I thought oxygen detection was extremely difficult, they must have better methods now.

adding:

https://news.arizona.edu/news/how-next-gen-telescopes-could-...

By @gentle - about 1 month
I'm always fascinated by the posters here who insist on second-guessing the writers and the scientists who spend their whole lives studying a topic like this.

No one needs to read your post fessing up to your profound ignorance and the fact that you didn't really read the link.

By @joquarky - about 1 month
Oxygen is everywhere.

Hydrogen is everywhere.

The possibilities are interesting.

By @hsnewman - about 1 month
I would be shocked if it were not found everywhere.
By @interludead - about 1 month
Finding oxygen in a galaxy this young is pretty wild
By @fasteo - about 1 month
Off topic:

- Is the big bang theory the scientific consensus on the origin and evolution of the universe ?

- What are the alternatives ?

By @shemtay - about 1 month
@dang the article does not seem to imply that molecular oxygen was found. maybe retitle to "Oxygen element" or "Atomic oxygen"?
By @EGreg - about 1 month
How can they possibly be sure that it is oxygen doing that?
By @m3kw9 - about 1 month
Gotta add the time factor. “Billions of years ago”
By @magicmicah85 - about 1 month
A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away…

This is interesting but at same time oxygen is the third most abundant element so it’s not surprising to find it, I suppose. Neat anyway.

By @jasonlfunk - about 1 month
I’m always a bit skeptical about these sorts of things. Perhaps I’m just ignorant about the methods used.. but the amount of data we can get from the most distant known galaxy can’t be very much. How confident can we be that the shift in observed light or whatever is actually from the presence of Oxygen and not one of probably countless other causes, both known and unknown.
By @slwvx - about 1 month
From [1] and [2] we read that the CMB was created around 380 million years after the Big Bang, and that hydrogen atoms were created at the same time. The original article above [3] says that this galaxy was created when the universe was about 300 million years old. These seem to be in conflict; am I misunderstanding something, or is there really a conflict there?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background#Pr...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Timeline

[3] https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2507/

By @indoordin0saur - about 1 month
Anyone else think this is a huge non-story? Like, of course there's going to be oxygen in distant galaxies. Why wouldn't there be? It would be far more interesting if there wasn't oxygen in distant galaxies.