The replication crisis may also be a theory crisis (2019)
The replication crisis in behavioral sciences stems from poor methods and fragmented research. Muthukrishna and Henrich advocate for coherent theories and formal models to enhance research precision and reliability.
Read original article
The replication crisis in behavioral sciences has raised concerns about the validity of research findings, primarily due to poor statistical methods and questionable research practices. However, researchers Michael Muthukrishna and Joseph Henrich argue that the issue extends beyond methodology to a lack of coherent theoretical frameworks. They contend that without overarching theories, research becomes fragmented, leading to an infinite number of questions and scattered results. This disorganization contributes to statistical issues that fuel the replication crisis. The authors advocate for the integration of formal models to enhance precision in research, allowing for better predictions and connections between findings. While some experts, like Tal Yarkoni, caution against an overemphasis on theoretical frameworks, Muthukrishna maintains that a collaborative approach, where data and theory inform each other, is essential for advancing the field. The call for improved theoretical foundations aims to clarify research outcomes and enhance the reliability of behavioral science.
- The replication crisis highlights issues in behavioral science research, including poor methods and lack of theoretical frameworks.
- Muthukrishna and Henrich emphasize the need for coherent theories to connect fragmented research findings.
- Formal modeling is proposed as a way to improve precision and predictive power in behavioral studies.
- Some experts caution against focusing too much on theory, advocating for a balance between theory and empirical data.
- A collaborative approach is suggested to integrate data and theory for more reliable research outcomes.
Related
Irreproducible Results
The article highlights declining reproducibility in scientific experiments, particularly in biological sciences, due to biases favoring positive results. Experts recommend open-source databases to document all experimental outcomes for improved reliability.
Repeatability: As Difficult as it is Important
The article emphasizes the importance of repeatability in experimental systems research, highlighting challenges in achieving it, particularly with open-source software, and recommending tools and documentation to aid replication.
The Median Researcher Problem
The "Median Researcher Problem" highlights how median researchers influence scientific discourse, allowing flawed practices to persist, as seen in the replication crisis, while smaller, intelligent communities may remain unrecognized.
Revisiting Stereotype Threat
Recent studies challenge the validity of stereotype threat, previously thought to explain performance gaps among negatively stereotyped groups, prompting a reevaluation of methodologies in social psychology and encouraging scientific rigor.
How far neuroscience is from understanding brains (2023)
Neuroscience struggles to form a cohesive theory of brain function due to conceptual obstacles, reliance on borrowed ideas, and inadequate data analysis methods, hindering progress in understanding neuronal interactions.
1 commentsRelated
Irreproducible Results
The article highlights declining reproducibility in scientific experiments, particularly in biological sciences, due to biases favoring positive results. Experts recommend open-source databases to document all experimental outcomes for improved reliability.
Repeatability: As Difficult as it is Important
The article emphasizes the importance of repeatability in experimental systems research, highlighting challenges in achieving it, particularly with open-source software, and recommending tools and documentation to aid replication.
The Median Researcher Problem
The "Median Researcher Problem" highlights how median researchers influence scientific discourse, allowing flawed practices to persist, as seen in the replication crisis, while smaller, intelligent communities may remain unrecognized.
Revisiting Stereotype Threat
Recent studies challenge the validity of stereotype threat, previously thought to explain performance gaps among negatively stereotyped groups, prompting a reevaluation of methodologies in social psychology and encouraging scientific rigor.
How far neuroscience is from understanding brains (2023)
Neuroscience struggles to form a cohesive theory of brain function due to conceptual obstacles, reliance on borrowed ideas, and inadequate data analysis methods, hindering progress in understanding neuronal interactions.