April 4th, 2025

Kerosene did not save the sperm whale (2024)

The article clarifies that kerosene did not save sperm whales from extinction, as hunting increased due to industrial demand. International bans and synthetic alternatives later contributed to their protection.

Read original articleLink Icon
ConfusionSkepticismFrustration
Kerosene did not save the sperm whale (2024)

The article discusses the misconception that kerosene saved sperm whales from extinction. While it is true that the introduction of kerosene in the 19th century reduced the demand for whale oil as a lighting fuel, it did not lead to a decline in whale hunting. In fact, the number of sperm whales killed increased significantly in the 20th century due to their continued use in various industries, including lubricants and pharmaceuticals. The author references economist William Nordhaus, who claimed that kerosene saved the whales, but argues that this narrative is misleading. Instead, the decline in whale populations was exacerbated by advancements in whaling technology and the ongoing demand for spermaceti oil. The real turning point for sperm whales came with international whaling bans and the subsequent development of synthetic alternatives to whale oil, particularly from the jojoba plant. This shift occurred much later than Nordhaus suggested and was driven by government intervention rather than market forces. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of critically evaluating historical narratives and recognizing the role of regulation in environmental conservation.

- Kerosene did not save sperm whales; whale hunting continued to rise after its introduction.

- The demand for spermaceti oil in various industries contributed to the decline of sperm whale populations.

- International whaling bans and synthetic alternatives ultimately helped protect sperm whales.

- The narrative that technology alone can solve environmental issues is overly simplistic.

- Historical accounts should be critically examined for accuracy and context.

Related

The Origin of Ambergris (2012)

The Origin of Ambergris (2012)

The article discusses the mysterious origin of ambergris found in sperm whales' intestines. Sperm whales consume squid, leading to ambergris formation. Researchers highlight the enigmatic deep-sea behaviors of sperm whales.

The sperm whale 'phonetic alphabet' revealed by AI

The sperm whale 'phonetic alphabet' revealed by AI

Researchers studying sperm whale communication have found structures resembling human language, indicating advanced communication skills. Analysis of 9,000 recordings revealed 156 distinct codas forming a complex communication system akin to human phonetics. This discovery suggests sperm whales possess a sophisticated communication capacity beyond previous understanding, potentially involving combinatorial coding similar to human language. The study emphasizes the importance of further research to safeguard these marine mammals from environmental threats.

The long road to ropeless fishing

The long road to ropeless fishing

Ropeless fishing gear aims to protect the declining North Atlantic right whale population but faces skepticism from fishers due to costs. Collaboration and government support are essential for successful adoption.

Great Whales Can Live a Lot Longer Than We Thought – If We Leave Them Alone

Great Whales Can Live a Lot Longer Than We Thought – If We Leave Them Alone

Recent research reveals great whales, including bowhead and fin whales, can live over 200 years, highlighting the need for conservation efforts to protect endangered species and halt whaling practices.

'Whale Conveyor Belt' Moves Tons of Nutrients Across the Ocean–Through Urine

'Whale Conveyor Belt' Moves Tons of Nutrients Across the Ocean–Through Urine

Whales significantly contribute to nutrient distribution in oceans, transporting 4,000 tons of nitrogen and 45,000 tons of biomass annually, benefiting coastal ecosystems and marine life through their migratory patterns.

AI: What people are saying
The comments reflect a mix of opinions and insights regarding the article's claims about kerosene and sperm whales.
  • Some commenters argue that kerosene did help save sperm whales by reducing demand for whale oil, while others dispute this claim.
  • There are discussions about the historical context of whaling and the efficiency of processing whale oil at sea.
  • Several users highlight the role of the Soviet Union in whaling practices and the impact of international regulations.
  • Comments suggest a broader interest in counterintuitive environmental stories and the complexities of resource use.
  • References to literature, such as Moby Dick, emphasize the cultural significance of whaling narratives.
Link Icon 15 comments
By @elif - 18 minutes
I wish the author had spelled out the subtextual implications for peak oil demand and the energy costs of solar. I will try to give my perspective I suppose.

We always thought that once solar achieved cost Parity with gas generation, it would be a cascade effect of rapid solarization due to the cost basis alone, finally shedding the necessity of ethical ideology to promote it.

That happened roughly in 2015 for the US, and nothing substantial changed. Then the costs of solar got cut in half. And now as we breach the mythical $1/watt barrier for utility scale solar installation, we still find ourselves breaking oil production records year after year.

We're so far past the "kerosene moment" and barely seeing exponential growth on solar capacity install. Meanwhile China is adding more than 4x as much.

I think the moral of the kerosene story and solar is that it's hard to flip a paradigm that is currently enabling people to get rich. The only time it seems to change is when a law is passed.

By @creddit - about 22 hours
Anyone who has read Moby Dick knows that this passage:

> And since whaling technology had come along so much since the 19th century - with powerful diesel engined vessels equipped with ever more lethal harpoons and even onboard processing plants, allowing sailors to drain the spermaceti out of their catches at sea rather than having to bring them back to land - sperm whale populations were ravaged long, long after the discovery of kerosene.

contains a distinct factual error. The whalers were processing their catch at sea even in the 1800s. Probably not as efficiently, but still they were not dragging their catch back to land for processing.

By @legitster - about 20 hours
The Soviet union had an outsized role in this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_the_Soviet_Union_an...

To meet lucrative production quotas, the Soviet Union lied to international agencies about how many whales they were catching. While they didn't harvest the most amount of whales in the 20th century, they disregarded treaties that protected endangered whales and breeding populations.

https://www.i-deel.org/blog/mass-killing-for-no-reason-the-p...

The worst part is there was little to no actual demand for whaling products in the Soviet Union, so most of they collected was treated as a waste product or simply dumped.

By @ciconia - about 8 hours
There's a similar idea about energy transitions: ostensibly human kind has transitioned from wood to coal to petrol to nuclear etc. Given time we'll have transitioned to renewables for all our energy needs...

In fact what happened is those energy sources kept being piled on top of one another. Today we consume more wood coal and fossils than ever before. [1]

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-energy-substitutio...

By @RandallBrown - about 21 hours
The graph kinda does show that kerosene saved the sperm whale doesn't it? Whaling went down for like 60 years before spiking once cars became a thing. I imagine electric lighting also helped out.
By @buildsjets - about 19 hours
NYT 1975: Transmission Problems in Cars Linked to Ban on Whale Killing

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/04/17/archives/transmission-pro...

By @hinkley - about 21 hours
I was at a meeting and was sitting next to a guy whose company made an on-premise clone of parts of AWS. By the end of that conversation I came to find out that a lot of their funding came from Amazon.

A lot of people will walk into a trap. Some, once in it, will thrash to get out of it. Even if they hurt themselves in the process, they gain their freedom. Other people, seeing an escape route, will happily or at least grudgingly stay a while longer. Which then doesn’t warn off observers from making the same mistake.

If it makes sense for AWS to fund a “competitor”, then it makes sense for whale oil lamp sellers to cheer for an alternative fuel because the users can think, “we can always switch to kerosene”. And I’ve seen too many people who want to try something at least once while they still have the chance to experience it.

By @didgetmaster - about 17 hours
The title and much of the article suggests that sperm whale might be extinct today.

While their population is down from estimates before whaling in the nineteen century; current estimates are about half a million of them are swimming around the globe today.

By @RcouF1uZ4gsC - about 22 hours
Kerosene did save the sperm whale.

And the author missed the reason:

> As I mentioned earlier, right from the start whale oil had other uses, beyond lighting. It was used to grease naval clocks, as well as being deployed in pharmaceuticals, paints and explosives.

Kerosene replaced the widespread, low margin, highly price sensitive use of spermaceti oil.

If the common person is using spermaceti oil for light every single day, there is no politically tenable way you can restrict the supply.

Kerosene replaces that, and now the common person doesn't really know or care about spermaceti oil.

Notice also the other use cases are generally higher up in the value chain than just burning it for light. Naval clocks, pharmaceuticals, paints, explosives. In addition, the users are more concentrated. Everybody burned spermaceti oil for lamps. There are only a few places that make naval clocks, pharmaceuticals, paints, and explosives. And they have the ability to absorb R&D costs for different lubricants because that is a high value use case.

A similar example of this is CFCs being banned. They were used in high value use cases with a limited amount of users. And even there, there was pushback with regard to home AC units - things that affected the common people.

The lesson we should take from this is that we need technology to provide us with alternatives for the common, price sensitive, widespread uses of something, before it becomes tenable to enact any type of supply restriction on it.

And then we can rely on the high value use cases finding alternatives.

By @dr_dshiv - about 17 hours
What are other counterintuitive stories like this? (Regardless of veracity)

* Kerosene saves the whales

* Plastics saves the elephants

* Coal saved the forests

Other similar stories?

By @wazoox - about 22 hours
The book ("Material World") is fantastic, I hope he'll make another tome on some other resources :)
By @scop - about 20 hours
Obligatory comment: Moby Dick is a work of stunning glory and if you think you can abridge it you are missing the entire point.
By @TheBlight - about 22 hours
For the same reason solar panels aren't going to stop people from drilling and sucking up every last drop of oil.