June 21st, 2024

Twitter and the spread of academic knowledge

Twitter plays a significant role in sharing academic knowledge and potentially boosting paper citations. Studies show mixed results on the correlation between tweets and citations, highlighting the need for further research to clarify Twitter's impact on knowledge dissemination.

Read original articleLink Icon
Twitter and the spread of academic knowledge

The article discusses the role of Twitter in spreading academic knowledge and its impact on citations of scientific papers. While physical proximity has traditionally facilitated serendipitous encounters and idea exchange, Twitter offers a digital platform for academics to share new discoveries and research. Studies have explored the correlation between tweets and paper citations, with some finding a positive relationship. However, randomized control tweet experiments have shown mixed results, with some studies indicating that tweeting does not significantly influence paper citations over time. Despite some studies reporting a potential increase in citations for tweeted papers, the statistical significance of this impact remains uncertain due to the noise in citation data. Further research is needed to better understand the extent to which Twitter contributes to knowledge diffusion in academia.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @walterbell - 4 months
Twitter consists of micro-communities, which should be factored into any attempts at statistical analysis. Some of those communities have migrated to Mastodon, where the presence of multiple servers provides additional signal for micro-community and cluster identification. In addition, Twitter(s) circa <year> are different datasets due to both platform policy and evolving membership.
By @n4r9 - 4 months
My wife is a plant pathologist with a strong interest in mycology. She uses twitter specifically for fungus-focused posts. Whether she actually finds it useful for research I don't know, but it seems to help with networking and finding out about events.
By @082349872349872 - 4 months
Compared with many things we believe we know, p<0.05 is still pretty weak.

For instance, I've seen quite a few medical correlations that were P<0.001.

I try now to avoid the mindset of "significant" vs "insignificant" as having a discrete black or white cutoff.

By @th0ma5 - 4 months
As people move to other platforms it feels like the signal could change and people may have more control over their feed but less serendipity?
By @aaron695 - 4 months
If it's true Twitter doesn't matter that would mean academia is truly broken.

It's certainly broken, but I doubt to that extent.

There's a conversation to be had about the costs (time and the risk of being cancelled) of running a Twitter account as a researcher and if you don't, how do you get your work on Twitter?

Anyway checkout Altmetric if the overlap between social media and academia interests you -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altmetric