Of Psion and Symbian
Psion, founded by David Edwin Potter in 1980, developed games for Sinclair ZX81, expanded to productivity software, and launched handheld computers like the Organiser II with enhanced features and programming capabilities. Their innovative products revolutionized portable computing in the 1980s.
Read original articlePsion, founded by David Edwin Potter in 1980, initially gained success developing games for the Sinclair ZX81. The company later expanded into productivity software, releasing a suite for the Sinclair QL in 1984. In 1986, Psion launched the Organiser II, a handheld computer with improved features and programming capabilities. Subsequent models like the Organizer II XP and LZ further enhanced RAM and functionality, with the latter introducing OPL language similar to BASIC. In 1989, Psion released the MC200, MC400, and MC600, notebook-sized computers powered by Intel 80C86 processors and featuring hot-swappable solid-state disks and touchpad controls. These machines also included a voice processor for recording and playback. Psion's innovative products marked significant advancements in portable computing during the 1980s, catering to both consumer and business needs with their compact yet functional designs.
Related
X debut 40 years ago (1984)
Robert W. Scheifler introduced the X window system in June 1984 for the VS100 Unix server, offering improved performance over W. The system was stable, with the Laboratory for Computer Science already transitioning to X and developing applications. Scheifler encouraged experimentation and welcomed volunteers for documentation contributions.
Atari 520ST Review in Creative Computing – By Paul Lefebvre
The Atari 520ST, released in July 1985, impressed with advanced features at a low price. Despite software limitations, it gained popularity quickly, leading to the later 1040ST release.
40 years later, X Window System is far more relevant than anyone could guess
The X Window System, developed by Scheifler and Gettys at MIT, remains relevant after 40 years. Its evolution from X10r4 to X11 brought graphical capabilities, cross-platform compatibility, and enduring value in academia and beyond.
ThinkPad 701C with a Framework brain transplant
A project merges Thinkpad 701C with modern tech: Framework mainboard, iPad 7 display, original keyboard/trackpoint, USB-A/C, GigE ports. Custom adaptations, new components designed. Positive community feedback received.
Pocket Z project hopes to rekindle pocket PC form factor with a RPi Zero 2W
The Pocket Z project reimagines pocket PCs with a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W, featuring a 7-inch touchscreen, membrane keyboard, Linux OS, and USB-C connectivity. Plans include downsizing to a 5-inch display.
Anyway, it’s sad that there was such a massive opportunity for European corporate players to invent mobile computing, but together they managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the form of Symbian (the evolution of Psion’s operating system, co-developed with Nokia and Ericsson).
The other day I was rummaging around papers in the attic, and found a black and white printout of an internal Nokia presentation from 2001 outlining their smartphone and mobile data strategy. It was striking how well they anticipated what users might want in the smartphone, but completely failed to project the technological milestones that might make those dreams realizable. The 2001 outlook was entirely obsessed with the limits of bandwidth and what mobile operators would allow on their network (i.e. how Nokia could enable operators to get a cut on all the content viewed by users).
Post-iPhone, it seems silly that they spent so much energy and engineering effort on shaving off a few kilobytes of 3G data here, squeezing apps into 1 MB RAM there, and so on. Apple was able to project the point where their desktop operating system (itself formerly a late-1980s workstation OS) could fit into mobile, and they also had the design capability to ruthlessly cut features to make that work. Nokia dabbled in all directions: bottom-up with Symbian, top-down with Maemo/Meego, but no commitment and no guiding vision except the managerial focus on cutting costs by putting the same old components a bit more cheaply into a growing range of colorful plastics.
The system was extremely efficient on low-powered machines (by which I mean both a slow CPU and a weak battery). As far as wringing maximum performance from hardware-that-be, I have never worked with a better system.
The learning curve of the API was insane, though (and the system dragged a lot of ancient pre-32-bit PSION/EPOC remnants within itself). So was the heterogenity of the devices. Every new device required some rewrite of existing apps, and Nokia pushed out dozens of them. On-device debugging mostly didn't work. Emulators were clumsy and bloated, but still lacked important APIs, such as sound.
At the end of the day, the system was so developer-unfriendly that everyone migrated happily to better pastures.
Personally I think that today an only iphone/macbook with just the default software (mail/contacts/calendar/etc) comes somewhat close to the same user experience. A Windows machine, while having a million different programs available at your fingertips, does not feel as a cohesive user experience.
If the author is referring to what I think he his, it was only a certain part of Symbian that did this. No other Symbian employees had access to that part of the building. Normal Symbian employees never actually got to see the phones that were being developed. All work their was done on an emulator (x86) and H2/H4 (armv5) reference boards.
This book details the politics that went on until the end https://www.amazon.co.uk/Smartphones-beyond-Lessons-remarkab...
Then, when I was in high school, my dad was developing applications for the national gas and water utility companies and they used Psion Workabouts with printer attachments, since they were rugged and basically only device approved for working in places with gas. He wanted to get out of the business, so he basically said if I would take over the devleopment and clients, which I did. I rewrote the code for the Psions and wrote an app in Visual Basic for windows machines (I cannot recollect which database I used) so they could download the client readings via the serial port and print it out.
I never really got into "professional" development after that, sticking mostly to product design, but I still like to dabble in code. I guess the thrill of working on a product from start to end and have it used by so many people still gets fills me with joy.
Fun times and to think that this has to be more than 20 years ago is crazy!
I accessed a heart rate monitor via BT using PyS60. Both were pretty straight forward.
With Android, termux comes close.
I had a colleague who worked in Nokia, on a TCS contract. He explained how the team was devasted upon hearing the news that Meego would be abandoned and Windows OS would be used.
I was hoping for Meego/Maemo before 13 years, then Sailfish and then Ubuntu touch. I don't know if there is any hope of mobile Linux (not Android) anymore.
The problem is majorily a limiting hardware, than the software itself. We had a Sailfish mobile in India, but the hardware was very disappointing that evev if you could live with the limited software ecosystem, the hardware was not really useful.
I see the same trend with PinePhone and Librem.
We made huge efficiency and battery chemistry gains, but software is lacking. Though it would be probably a quite expensive device that only a few want.
At the time I thought he was the reason that the phone existed at all, not quite knowing the delicate politics between Symbian and Maemo at the time.
Still he smiled amicably enough and it's a treasured photo of mine.
I followed the story of Nokia, Symbian and Psion closely after that and the whole thing just felt like one of the biggest dropped balls in corporate history. Sad ... too many cooks, maybe ...
This is one of those sentences that make abortretry.fail articles feel slapped together from other sources without attribution. Who is “CPU” in this sentence?
Context and a little digging reveals it is likely a reference to another early British company in the PC space, Cambridge Processor Unit Ltd. , described in the History section of the Acorn computer Wikipedia. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Computers
This random reference to a random company never goes anywhere is never properly explained in the first place. It gives the feel of something that has been quickly adapted by the author without much thought or understanding.
https://www.zdnet.com/product/cosmo-communicator/
[Edited for typos]
The subsequent M$ purchase of that Nokia phone division was one of the biggest damages done by Microsoft to the computing world.
I'd take a computer with a color screen, Bluetooth, running Linux and that keyboard - it could be fun for ham radio stuff.
Related
X debut 40 years ago (1984)
Robert W. Scheifler introduced the X window system in June 1984 for the VS100 Unix server, offering improved performance over W. The system was stable, with the Laboratory for Computer Science already transitioning to X and developing applications. Scheifler encouraged experimentation and welcomed volunteers for documentation contributions.
Atari 520ST Review in Creative Computing – By Paul Lefebvre
The Atari 520ST, released in July 1985, impressed with advanced features at a low price. Despite software limitations, it gained popularity quickly, leading to the later 1040ST release.
40 years later, X Window System is far more relevant than anyone could guess
The X Window System, developed by Scheifler and Gettys at MIT, remains relevant after 40 years. Its evolution from X10r4 to X11 brought graphical capabilities, cross-platform compatibility, and enduring value in academia and beyond.
ThinkPad 701C with a Framework brain transplant
A project merges Thinkpad 701C with modern tech: Framework mainboard, iPad 7 display, original keyboard/trackpoint, USB-A/C, GigE ports. Custom adaptations, new components designed. Positive community feedback received.
Pocket Z project hopes to rekindle pocket PC form factor with a RPi Zero 2W
The Pocket Z project reimagines pocket PCs with a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W, featuring a 7-inch touchscreen, membrane keyboard, Linux OS, and USB-C connectivity. Plans include downsizing to a 5-inch display.