Oops, a Meta 'error' limited political content on Instagram and Threads
Instagram users face a glitch where the opt-out setting for limiting political content activates automatically. Meta acknowledges the issue as unintentional, promising a fix without a specified timeline. Users struggle with the setting resetting upon app closure.
Read original articleInstagram users have reported a glitch where the setting limiting political content from people they don't follow turns on automatically, even after they try to change it back. This issue affects both Instagram and Threads, prompting Meta to acknowledge it as an unintentional error. The opt-out setting, introduced in March, allows users to limit recommendations of political content but was turned on by default without notifying users. Instagram head Adam Mosseri previously stated that the goal was to give users control over the political content they see while still allowing interaction with it. Despite Meta's assurance to fix the problem, users continue to experience the setting resetting whenever they close the app. The company has not provided a timeline for resolving the issue.
Related
Small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline
Small claims court is a surprising recourse for Meta users like Ray Palena and Valerie Garza seeking help with account issues. Despite challenges, some have successfully resolved problems independently. Users resort to legal action due to Meta's lack of human customer service support.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
Microsoft is shooting itself in the foot: A review of the Microsoft Start app
A review criticizes Microsoft Start app for irrelevant features like Copilot, confusing interface focused on AI, nonsensical Facebook cartoon profile picture generator, uninteresting news feed with constant refreshing issues. Glitchy and unsatisfactory news-reading experience.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data security concerns. Legal battles persist over potential divestment from ByteDance. Reports suggest data sharing between TikTok and ByteDance.
SCOTUS Rules That US Government Can Continue Talking to Social Media Companies
The Supreme Court allows US government to communicate with social media companies, overturning an injunction. Court finds lack of evidence for direct censorship injuries. Decision may increase government-platform interaction.
Is this a bad thing? It's nice politics don't show and spread by default.
Related
Small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline
Small claims court is a surprising recourse for Meta users like Ray Palena and Valerie Garza seeking help with account issues. Despite challenges, some have successfully resolved problems independently. Users resort to legal action due to Meta's lack of human customer service support.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
Microsoft is shooting itself in the foot: A review of the Microsoft Start app
A review criticizes Microsoft Start app for irrelevant features like Copilot, confusing interface focused on AI, nonsensical Facebook cartoon profile picture generator, uninteresting news feed with constant refreshing issues. Glitchy and unsatisfactory news-reading experience.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data security concerns. Legal battles persist over potential divestment from ByteDance. Reports suggest data sharing between TikTok and ByteDance.
SCOTUS Rules That US Government Can Continue Talking to Social Media Companies
The Supreme Court allows US government to communicate with social media companies, overturning an injunction. Court finds lack of evidence for direct censorship injuries. Decision may increase government-platform interaction.