June 28th, 2024

The NSA Wants Carte Blanche for Warrantless Surveillance

The NSA seeks expanded warrantless surveillance powers under Section 702, raising concerns about privacy infringement. The proposed SAFE Act aims to modify warrant requirements, sparking debate over government surveillance authority.

Read original articleLink Icon
The NSA Wants Carte Blanche for Warrantless Surveillance

The National Security Agency (NSA) is seeking expanded powers for warrantless surveillance through Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This legislation would allow the NSA to collect communications of Americans with non-Americans outside the country without a warrant, potentially infringing on privacy rights. The NSA's Utah data center, with massive storage capacity, highlights the scale of intercepted private data. Concerns have been raised about the impact on journalists, attorneys, and their sources if surveillance continues without warrants. Senators have proposed the SAFE Act to modify warrant requirements under Section 702. Critics argue that the bill represents a significant expansion of government surveillance authority and poses a threat to individual liberties. The House has advanced the bill to the Senate for a vote without a warrant requirement, prompting opposition from senators like Ron Wyden. The debate reflects ongoing tensions between national security interests and privacy rights, reminiscent of past controversies surrounding NSA surveillance practices.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @mmh0000 - 4 months
They've always wanted access, a somewhat old NSA program was the Clipper Chip[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip

By @more_corn - 4 months
Time and time again they prove to be bad stewards of the information they do have, and unwilling to abide by the restrictions that are legally placed on them.

I’m disinclined to support any extension of their powers.

By @vaadu - 4 months
"The size of a small city, it is the largest, most secret, most powerful, and most intrusive spy organization ever created."

Is it more intrusive than the KGB, Stasi or Chinese state security? Cite your source.

BTW, this story is from 2 months ago.