Journal retracts all 23 articles in special issue
A journal retracted 23 articles from a special issue due to compromised peer review. Guest editor Abbas Mardani didn't comment. Authors criticized lack of transparency and faced consequences. Publisher Springer mentioned ongoing investigations.
Read original articleA journal retracted all 23 articles from a special issue due to concerns about a compromised peer review process. The retraction notice cited issues such as compromised editorial handling, inappropriate references, and being out of scope. The guest editor, Abbas Mardani, a highly cited researcher, did not respond to requests for comment. One co-author called the retraction a "social taboo," while another disagreed, blaming the publisher. The retracted papers, part of the issue "Prescriptive Analytics Using Machine Learning and Mathematical Programming for Sustainable Operations Research," were published between June 2022 and October 2023. The publisher, Springer, mentioned ongoing investigations and a commitment to publication integrity. This incident follows a previous retraction of 81 papers from another special issue. Authors expressed frustration over the lack of transparency and the consequences they faced due to the retraction. The journal did not provide details on how the concerns were raised or the investigation's findings.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
The case for criminalizing scientific misconduct · Chris Said
The article argues for criminalizing scientific misconduct, citing cases like Sylvain Lesné's fake research. It proposes Danish-style committees and federal laws to address misconduct effectively, emphasizing accountability and public trust protection.
Reputation Farming Using Closed GitHub Issues
Reputation farming on GitHub involves manipulating closed issues and pull requests to falsely boost accounts' reputation. Maintainers are urged to monitor activity, report suspicious behavior, and automate checks to prevent this deceptive practice.
Widely reported study implying divorce more likely when wives fall ill gets axed
A study linking wives' illness to divorce risk was retracted due to a coding error. Corrected analysis shows only heart problems increase divorce risk. Authors acknowledged and corrected the mistake professionally.
The Center for Investigative Reporting Is Suing OpenAI and Microsoft
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging unauthorized use of stories impacting relationships and revenue. Legal action mirrors media concerns over tech companies using journalistic content without permission.
And they learned nothing in the year since, except to try far fewer articles. Why have "guest-edited issues" if as a rule they are going to undermine the work of their guests?
Obviously they need a period of co-editing before they are willing to trust guest editors.
The thing that might be bad is having the individual author tarred with a retraction if they had nothing to do with the process. But I don't how academic records are evaluated at this point.
Then again, a journal called "Annals of Operations Research" and an article titled "Prescriptive Analytics Using Machine Learning and Mathematical Programming for Sustainable Operations Research" sounds abstract and vague enough that most of the content may be like that.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
The case for criminalizing scientific misconduct · Chris Said
The article argues for criminalizing scientific misconduct, citing cases like Sylvain Lesné's fake research. It proposes Danish-style committees and federal laws to address misconduct effectively, emphasizing accountability and public trust protection.
Reputation Farming Using Closed GitHub Issues
Reputation farming on GitHub involves manipulating closed issues and pull requests to falsely boost accounts' reputation. Maintainers are urged to monitor activity, report suspicious behavior, and automate checks to prevent this deceptive practice.
Widely reported study implying divorce more likely when wives fall ill gets axed
A study linking wives' illness to divorce risk was retracted due to a coding error. Corrected analysis shows only heart problems increase divorce risk. Authors acknowledged and corrected the mistake professionally.
The Center for Investigative Reporting Is Suing OpenAI and Microsoft
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging unauthorized use of stories impacting relationships and revenue. Legal action mirrors media concerns over tech companies using journalistic content without permission.