AI Companies Need to Be Regulated: Open Letter
AI companies face calls for regulation due to concerns over unethical practices highlighted in an open letter by MacStories to the U.S. Congress and European Parliament. The letter stresses the need for transparency and protection of content creators.
Read original articleAI companies are being called to be regulated in an open letter addressed to the U.S. Congress and European Parliament by MacStories. The letter highlights concerns about the unethical practices of AI companies using large language models without consent, leading to potential copyright infringement and a negative impact on the open web. The letter emphasizes the need for regulations to prevent further misuse of intellectual property and to ensure transparency in the training of AI models. MacStories, a media company, stresses the importance of protecting content creators and maintaining the integrity of the internet as a platform for creativity and communication. The letter urges legislators to support legislation that safeguards the rights of publishers and creators in the face of AI advancements that threaten the fundamental principles of the web. The authors, Federico Viticci and John Voorhees, advocate for a regulatory framework that prioritizes consent, transparency, and fair compensation for content used in AI training.
Related
Y Combinator, AI startups oppose California AI safety bill
Y Combinator and 140+ machine-learning startups oppose California Senate Bill 1047 for AI safety, citing innovation hindrance and vague language concerns. Governor Newsom also fears over-regulation impacting tech economy. Debates continue.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
Microsoft AI CEO: Web content is 'freeware'
Microsoft's CEO discusses AI training on web content, emphasizing fair use unless restricted. Legal challenges arise over scraping restrictions, highlighting the balance between fair use and copyright concerns for AI development.
Regulation Alone Will Not Save Us from Big Tech
The article addresses challenges of Big Tech monopolies in AI, advocating for user-owned, open-source AI to prioritize well-being over profit. Polosukhin suggests a shift to open source AI for a diverse, accountable ecosystem.
Related
Y Combinator, AI startups oppose California AI safety bill
Y Combinator and 140+ machine-learning startups oppose California Senate Bill 1047 for AI safety, citing innovation hindrance and vague language concerns. Governor Newsom also fears over-regulation impacting tech economy. Debates continue.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
Microsoft CEO of AI Your online content is 'freeware' fodder for training models
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, faced legal action for using online content as "freeware" to train neural networks. The debate raises concerns about copyright, AI training, and intellectual property rights.
Microsoft AI CEO: Web content is 'freeware'
Microsoft's CEO discusses AI training on web content, emphasizing fair use unless restricted. Legal challenges arise over scraping restrictions, highlighting the balance between fair use and copyright concerns for AI development.
Regulation Alone Will Not Save Us from Big Tech
The article addresses challenges of Big Tech monopolies in AI, advocating for user-owned, open-source AI to prioritize well-being over profit. Polosukhin suggests a shift to open source AI for a diverse, accountable ecosystem.