July 1st, 2024

Regulation Alone Will Not Save Us from Big Tech

The article addresses challenges of Big Tech monopolies in AI, advocating for user-owned, open-source AI to prioritize well-being over profit. Polosukhin suggests a shift to open source AI for a diverse, accountable ecosystem.

Read original articleLink Icon
Regulation Alone Will Not Save Us from Big Tech

The article discusses the challenges posed by Big Tech monopolies in the realm of AI and the limitations of relying solely on regulation to address these issues. The author, Illia Polosukhin, emphasizes the need for AI to be user-owned and open source to ensure it benefits humanity. He highlights the risks associated with closed, for-profit AI models that prioritize profit over user well-being. Polosukhin advocates for investing in open source, User-Owned AI as a proactive approach to managing risks, improving safety, and fostering collaboration among AI builders. By promoting transparency, data openness, and user empowerment, User-Owned AI aims to prioritize individual well-being and community success over corporate profit motives. The author argues that regulations alone are insufficient due to their reactive nature and potential to stifle innovation. Instead, he proposes a shift towards open source AI to create a more diverse and accountable AI ecosystem. Polosukhin's insights underscore the importance of rethinking AI governance to ensure a more ethical and user-centric approach in the face of rapidly evolving technology.

Related

Not all 'open source' AI models are open: here's a ranking

Not all 'open source' AI models are open: here's a ranking

Researchers found large language models claiming to be open source restrict access. Debate on AI model openness continues, with concerns over "open-washing" by tech giants. EU's AI Act may exempt open source models. Transparency and reproducibility are crucial for AI innovation.

Why American tech companies need to help build AI weaponry

Why American tech companies need to help build AI weaponry

U.S. tech companies play a crucial role in AI weaponry development for future warfare. Authors stress military supremacy, ethical considerations, and urge societal debate on military force and AI weaponry. Tech industry faces resistance over military projects.

All web "content" is freeware

All web "content" is freeware

Microsoft's CEO of AI discusses open web content as freeware since the 90s, raising concerns about AI-generated content quality and sustainability. Generative AI vendors defend practices amid transparency and accountability issues. Experts warn of a potential tech industry bubble.

Microsofts AI boss thinks its perfectly OK to steal content if its on open web

Microsofts AI boss thinks its perfectly OK to steal content if its on open web

Microsoft's AI boss, Mustafa Suleyman, challenges copyright norms by advocating for free use of online content. His stance triggers debates on AI ethics and copyright laws in the digital era.

Ari Emanuel calls Sam Altman a "con man" who can't be trusted with AI

Ari Emanuel calls Sam Altman a "con man" who can't be trusted with AI

Ari Emanuel criticizes OpenAI's Sam Altman as untrustworthy in AI development, emphasizing the need for regulation and caution. Altman stresses responsible AI creation with societal input, showcasing differing views on AI's future.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @squigz - 4 months
We need both.

Anyone who thinks we don't need regulation because open-source can save us all hasn't been paying attention the past few decades. The convenience tech companies offer can't be ignored, because it's exactly why users don't opt for open-source solutions that are (arguably, at least) far superior. It is not reasonable to expect casual users to be able to - or even want to! - debug their software, or jump through hoops to get it installed, keep it updated, etc.

By @ep103 - 4 months
How the heck does regulation even continue to exist in a post-Chevron world?