July 2nd, 2024

Meta Ruling Gives US Citizens Path to Sue for Alleged H-1B Abuse

A federal appeals court ruling allows US citizens to sue Meta Platforms Inc. over alleged bias towards immigrant workers under Section 1981. The decision may lead to more lawsuits challenging discriminatory employment practices.

Read original articleLink Icon
Meta Ruling Gives US Citizens Path to Sue for Alleged H-1B Abuse

A recent federal appeals court ruling against Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, has created a potential pathway for US citizens to sue over alleged preference for immigrant workers. The ruling by a divided three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stated that US citizens have standing to bring bias cases under Section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits race discrimination in the making and enforcement of contracts. This decision has the potential to increase lawsuits as Section 1981 is less restrictive than Title VII and the Immigration and Nationality Act. The law, originally aimed at ensuring equal rights for Black Americans, has now been interpreted to allow US citizens to challenge alleged discriminatory practices in employment. This ruling has sparked discussions about the implications for future cases involving employment discrimination based on nationality or immigration status.

Related

Small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline

Small claims court became Meta's customer service hotline

Small claims court is a surprising recourse for Meta users like Ray Palena and Valerie Garza seeking help with account issues. Despite challenges, some have successfully resolved problems independently. Users resort to legal action due to Meta's lack of human customer service support.

SCOTUS Rules That US Government Can Continue Talking to Social Media Companies

SCOTUS Rules That US Government Can Continue Talking to Social Media Companies

The Supreme Court allows US government to communicate with social media companies, overturning an injunction. Court finds lack of evidence for direct censorship injuries. Decision may increase government-platform interaction.

Supreme Court rules that the SEC's in-house rulings violate US constitution

Supreme Court rules that the SEC's in-house rulings violate US constitution

The US Supreme Court ruled SEC's in-house proceedings violate jury trial rights, impacting fraud fighting. Decision criticized, SEC loses tool. Trend limits regulators' power, sparks debate on agency-judiciary balance.

Supreme Court limits use of SEC in-house tribunals

Supreme Court limits use of SEC in-house tribunals

The Supreme Court ruled against SEC's use of internal tribunals in fraud cases, citing constitutional violations. Experts predict fewer enforcement actions due to required jury trials, impacting federal agencies' power and regulatory authority.

Instagram and Facebook Users Turn to Small Claims Courts to Recover Accounts

Instagram and Facebook Users Turn to Small Claims Courts to Recover Accounts

Users frustrated with Meta's lack of customer support are turning to small claims courts to recover lost Facebook and Instagram accounts. Legal action offers a means to hold Meta accountable amid growing user dissatisfaction.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @aprilthird2021 - 4 months
I think the standing should be allowed for Mr. Rajaram to sue. I think discrimination on citizenship status should be considered under that act.

I highly doubt Mr. Rajaram will be able to prove that Meta prefers to hire noncitizens whom they can pay less, precisely because they pay them extremely well. Doing that sort of removes any notion that they gain anything from preferring noncitizens, who have an extra cost associated with their legal status.

By @potatoball - 4 months
Archive.is unfortunately does not have the full version of the article