JavaScript Ruined the Web [video]
The video discusses limitations of using React and Gatsby in web development, highlighting drawbacks like decreased speed, complexities from updates, compatibility issues, and reliance on external dependencies.
Read original article
The YouTube video at the specified URL delves into the limitations and issues associated with utilizing contemporary web development tools such as React and Gatsby. It emphasizes the potential drawbacks of these frameworks, including the propensity to decrease website speed and introduce complexities through frequent updates, compatibility issues, and reliance on external dependencies.
Related
It's not just you, Next.js is getting harder to use
Next.js 13 introduces App Router with Server Components and enhanced caching, but users face challenges in utilizing features like Layouts and cookies. The shift to a more complex framework raises debates on balancing functionality and user-friendliness.
Enhancing New York Times Web Performance with React 18
The New York Times upgraded to React 18 for better performance and new features like Concurrent Mode and server-side rendering. Challenges with "embedded interactives" were overcome, leading to improved website performance.
New Web Development: Or, why Copilots and chatbots are bad for modern web dev
The analysis critiques Copilots, chatbots, and React for web development, citing slow sites, complex code, and high costs. It advocates for a shift to browser APIs, CSS, and HTML for better performance and lower expenses. Transition challenges include finding developers skilled in vanilla JavaScript. Organizations are urged to prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and core web technology training.
HTML-ivating your Django web app with Htmx, AlpineJS, and streaming HTML
The video discusses concerns over the prevalence of single page applications online, promoting traditional server-based websites. It recommends Django over React, demonstrating fast website creation and speed optimization techniques.
Node 18 Ate My Website
The author upgraded their Next.js website to Node.js 18, facing issues with deprecated dependencies. They rebuilt the site with TypeScript, Contentlayer, Tailwind CSS, and Vercel Analytics, emphasizing simplicity and emerging technologies.
2 commentsRelated
It's not just you, Next.js is getting harder to use
Next.js 13 introduces App Router with Server Components and enhanced caching, but users face challenges in utilizing features like Layouts and cookies. The shift to a more complex framework raises debates on balancing functionality and user-friendliness.
Enhancing New York Times Web Performance with React 18
The New York Times upgraded to React 18 for better performance and new features like Concurrent Mode and server-side rendering. Challenges with "embedded interactives" were overcome, leading to improved website performance.
New Web Development: Or, why Copilots and chatbots are bad for modern web dev
The analysis critiques Copilots, chatbots, and React for web development, citing slow sites, complex code, and high costs. It advocates for a shift to browser APIs, CSS, and HTML for better performance and lower expenses. Transition challenges include finding developers skilled in vanilla JavaScript. Organizations are urged to prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and core web technology training.
HTML-ivating your Django web app with Htmx, AlpineJS, and streaming HTML
The video discusses concerns over the prevalence of single page applications online, promoting traditional server-based websites. It recommends Django over React, demonstrating fast website creation and speed optimization techniques.
Node 18 Ate My Website
The author upgraded their Next.js website to Node.js 18, facing issues with deprecated dependencies. They rebuilt the site with TypeScript, Contentlayer, Tailwind CSS, and Vercel Analytics, emphasizing simplicity and emerging technologies.