July 6th, 2024

Things[5] I Learned About Leadership from the Death and Rebirth of Microsoft

Dare Obasanjo reflects on Satya Nadella's leadership at Microsoft, highlighting lessons on cultural change, customer focus, cutting losses, efficient resource allocation, and embracing open source, leading to stock price success.

Read original articleLink Icon
Things[5] I Learned About Leadership from the Death and Rebirth of Microsoft

In a Medium article, Dare Obasanjo reflects on Microsoft's transformation under Satya Nadella's leadership. He highlights five key lessons learned from the company's turnaround. Firstly, Nadella focused on changing Microsoft's culture, promoting a growth mindset and encouraging innovation. Secondly, he shifted the company's focus to prioritize customer needs over rigid strategies, exemplified by launching Office on the iPad. Thirdly, Nadella demonstrated the importance of cutting losses by discontinuing unsuccessful ventures like Windows Phone and Nokia Lumia. Fourthly, the CFO, Amy Hood, emphasized considering the opportunity cost of investments, ensuring efficient resource allocation. Lastly, under Nadella, Microsoft embraced open source and listened to engineers, enhancing productivity and morale within the company. These strategic shifts led to Microsoft's stock price soaring to $410 and being hailed as a successful tech industry CEO. Nadella's leadership exemplifies the importance of cultural transformation, customer-centricity, strategic decision-making, resource allocation, and valuing the input of engineers in driving organizational success.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @legitster - 5 months
I'm not sure if I agree with the premise.

Microsoft had a lot of big successes in the "dead" period - Xbox for example is pretty absent, as is Surface. They also had a lot of non-successes that were revolutionary in their own right - basically inventing the first major music streaming service.

Also, most of the key changes at Microsoft were underway before Nadella - most importantly getting business customers to agree to subscription service models and cloud migration.

By @burningChrome - 5 months
I wouldn't call their mobile OS a failure. We now see the Windows mobile platform was pretty far ahead of both Apple and Android at the time. The one thing that sunk it was the app store and Google refusing to allow its products to be used on Microsoft's platform.

It's interesting the article completely leaves out how Microsoft abandoning stack ranking when Satya was brought on as the new CEO. Ballmer continued to defend it even after he left the company. I think getting rid of this had a huge impact on the "growth mindset" that allowed them to get out from under a lot of the underperforming products and teams within the company. Instead of competing with each other, they were all on the same team now, trying to collectively push the company in a better direction.

By @sharadov - 5 months
Making a cultural change is hard.

It worked at MS because Satya could do the hard things - killing the Windows Phone, embracing Open source thus signaling to the employees that there would be a radical shift.

Too many companies talk about culture, especially leadership, and not realize that it starts top-down.

MS was a remarkable turnaround story.

By @dstroot - 5 months
No single one item on the list is revolutionary. In fact they all seem like common sense. I think Satya reversed the mis-management of Ballmer mainly. But his cultural changes (even embraced open source) were huge!
By @ein0p - 5 months
Ironically this “death” and “bad leadership” produced the only thing that keeps Microsoft alive today: Azure. It exists only because Gates and Ballmer had the foresight to fund it.