Usefulness Grounds Truth
The article explores how usefulness underpins truth, emphasizing practicality over abstract debates. It urges focusing on beneficial information to uncover practical truths in various fields, advocating for real-world impact over theoretical notions.
Read original article
The article discusses the concept that usefulness is the foundation of truth. It delves into the idea that debates on intelligence, truth, and reality often revolve around what is practical and applicable in the real world. The author emphasizes the importance of focusing on the usefulness of information rather than getting caught up in abstract debates. By reframing questions to consider what is beneficial or applicable, individuals can navigate through opinions and theories to find practical truths. The article uses examples from science, philosophy, and everyday life to illustrate how truth emerges from the usefulness of predictions and actions. Ultimately, the message encourages readers to prioritize practicality and real-world impact over abstract concepts of truth and intelligence.
Related
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle
Nassim Nicholas Taleb criticizes IQ as flawed, capturing extreme unintelligence and test-taking skills, not true intelligence. He questions its use in profiling countries and predicting success, advocating for a broader view of mental abilities.
1 commentsRelated
Nobody knows what's going on
Misinformation's impact on beliefs, reliance on unreliable sources, and human tendency to trust comforting information are discussed. Difficulty in discerning truth and consequences of widespread misinformation are highlighted.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle
Nassim Nicholas Taleb criticizes IQ as flawed, capturing extreme unintelligence and test-taking skills, not true intelligence. He questions its use in profiling countries and predicting success, advocating for a broader view of mental abilities.