July 8th, 2024

For the first time in more than 150 years, Alberta's electricity is coal free

Alberta has ended coal-fired electricity generation after over 150 years, supported by organizations and policies promoting renewable energy. The milestone highlights environmental progress and the shift towards sustainable energy sources.

Read original articleLink Icon
For the first time in more than 150 years, Alberta's electricity is coal free

Alberta has achieved a significant milestone by becoming coal-free for the first time in over 150 years. The last coal plant in the province went offline on June 16, marking the end of coal-fired electricity generation. Various organizations, including the Pembina Institute and health associations, played crucial roles in advocating for this transition. The shift away from coal was supported by policies like carbon pricing and regulations with clear targets, as well as investments in renewable energy and gas-fired electricity. Despite initial skepticism, the phase-out of coal in Alberta demonstrates that substantial environmental progress is achievable. Looking ahead, there is a focus on further decarbonizing the electricity system by 2035, with renewable energy being highlighted as a cost-effective and sustainable alternative. The success of eliminating coal underscores the importance of continued efforts to reduce emissions and invest in modernizing infrastructure to meet future energy needs efficiently.

Related

One Year Since Germany's Nuclear Exit: Renewables Expand, Fossil Fuels Reduced

One Year Since Germany's Nuclear Exit: Renewables Expand, Fossil Fuels Reduced

One year after Germany's nuclear exit, Fraunhofer ISE reports increased renewable energy capacity, reduced fossil fuel electricity generation, and a cleaner energy mix. Renewable sources compensated for lost nuclear power, leading to a 26% decrease in non-renewable generation.

China's Offshore Wind Power Prices to Undercut Coal This Year

China's Offshore Wind Power Prices to Undercut Coal This Year

China's energy sector sees offshore wind power prices dropping below coal-generated electricity, driven by government-approved projects. A 306MW wind farm near Shanghai offers electricity 27% cheaper than coal. Plans aim to triple offshore wind capacity by 2030, aligning with China's renewable energy goals.

Power station's last coal delivery arrives by rail

Power station's last coal delivery arrives by rail

The Ratcliffe-on-Soar power station in Nottinghamshire received its final coal delivery, marking the end of its coal era. The station plans to transition to zero-carbon technology, symbolizing the UK's energy shift.

Carbon Capture Technology Called a 'Boondoggle' for Oil Industry

Carbon Capture Technology Called a 'Boondoggle' for Oil Industry

Carbon capture technology faces criticism for potentially extending oil well operations, funded by public money. Enhanced oil recovery in Saskatchewan raises environmental and effectiveness concerns, seen as a tactic to prolong fossil fuel use.

5% of Earth's Power Plants Create 73% of the Energy Sector's Emissions

5% of Earth's Power Plants Create 73% of the Energy Sector's Emissions

A study identifies 5% of global power plants as major emitters, concentrated in Europe, East Asia, and India. Urges upgrading to reduce emissions, highlighting a top polluter in Poland. Emphasizes tailored efficiency improvements for effective emission reduction.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @neonate - 3 months
By @photochemsyn - 3 months
Alberta's tar sands are even dirtier than coal - because large amounts of natural gas are required to convert the tar sands into syncrude, which is like a crude oil that requires more refining to produce gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from it. The residue from tar sands refining is petcoke, which gets burned in regional power plants and exported overseas:

https://skepticalscience.com/legal-fight-leave-dirtiest-foss...

Since the coke is being exported to India and China for consumption in power plants there, there's zero change in the amount of fossil CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere, so any effort to promote this as 'cleaning up the tar sands' is just fossil industry greenwashing.

https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-marke...

By @chollida1 - 3 months
It is frustrating as someone who lives in Canada and has spend so much money to remove coal that India and China have said FU to the world and increased their coal usage.

I guess given that those two countries are keeping Russia afloat by buying their oil it shouldn't be a surprise, but its still disappointing to see those countries choosing the path they did.

By @toomuchtodo - 3 months
ElectricityMaps zone CA-AB: https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/CA-AB?wind=false&solar=...

Total fossil gas generation capacity is ~12.7GW. Seems straightforward to replace with solar, wind, batteries, and interconnects with neighboring grids.

Wind and Solar Potential resource: https://www.pembina.org/pub/wind-solar-alberta

By @JamesCoyne - 3 months
Alberta is somewhat unique within Canada, with electricity trading on a market operated by AESO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta_Electric_System_Operat...
By @softfalcon - 3 months
Hey folks, I live in Alberta. This isn't as big of a win as you all think it is. We replaced coal burning with natural gas and gasoline burning power generation.

For those who will say, "but Alberta has wind and solar!" please know that our current premiere (similar to a governor) is actively attacking all of our renewable energy investments. Her name is Danielle Smith and she's quite literally a former oil and gas lobbyist.

The only reason this is being touted is because big oil in Alberta is happy we've switched over to burning their carbon emitter of choice.

Take that into account when you read this feel good piece about Alberta being "coal free".

By @bastien2 - 3 months
Unfortunately they did it by switching to natural gas instead of the massive sustainable buildout they needed. Good job on reducing thorium and uranium emissions, at least.
By @kalupa - 3 months
Now it's mostly natural gas, instead! With a good chunk of wind, but the current government seems to dislike "renewables"
By @DowagerDave - 3 months
Note: even though this is published by a large and pretty well respected newspaper it's an op-ed piece from a left-leaning environmental organization (which should be obvious if you read it). Dropping coal is pretty different from dropping fossil fuels, especially right now when natural gas is dirt cheap. It's also debatable if Alberta currently needs any more solar or wind; what we definitely need is storage for these generative sources. The other components of industrial use and transportation are probably more effective targets for big wins than getting gas out of the electricity grid.
By @MisterDizzy - 3 months
Let's see how long it takes them to realize they should have gone with the latest nuclear power tech and will eventually be unable to meet demand with anything but coal or nuclear (unless something changes).