Pulitzer winning reporter faces jail for protecting funding scandal sources
Reporter Anna Wolfe faces potential jail time for refusing to reveal sources in a defamation lawsuit by Mississippi's former governor. The case raises concerns about press freedom and the challenges journalists encounter.
Read original articleReporter Anna Wolfe, who won a Pulitzer for uncovering Mississippi's welfare fraud scandal, is now facing potential jail time as she and her editor are ordered to reveal confidential sources in a defamation lawsuit brought by the state's former governor. The lawsuit alleges that Wolfe and her team wrongly accused the governor of criminal conduct related to the misappropriation of $77 million in federal welfare funds. The case highlights the challenges journalists face in protecting their sources and maintaining the integrity of investigative journalism. Wolfe and her organization, Mississippi Today, are fighting the court order, arguing that revealing sources would undermine the trust essential for their work. The lawsuit raises concerns about press freedom and the ability of journalists to hold public figures accountable without fear of legal repercussions. The situation underscores the ongoing battle between the media's role in exposing corruption and the potential consequences journalists may face for their reporting.
Related
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange expected to plead guilty to felony charge
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act for publishing classified documents. Expected to serve 62-month sentence in Australia after legal battle and extradition process.
Julian Assange will plead guilty in deal with US and be freed from prison
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, to plead guilty to a felony charge, securing release from prison. Deal resolves legal battle over classified documents. Sentencing includes five years, matching time served.
EFF Statement on Assange Plea Deal
The Electronic Frontier Foundation expresses concern over Julian Assange's Espionage Act conviction, highlighting threats to press freedom. EFF urges safeguarding journalistic activities and preventing similar incidents.
Federal whistleblowers are entitled to damages of missed future pay, court rules
The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled federal whistleblowers can claim compensatory damages for future lost pay due to retaliation, without proving guaranteed future employment. This decision sets a precedent for whistleblower cases.
The Center for Investigative Reporting Is Suing OpenAI and Microsoft
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging unauthorized use of stories impacting relationships and revenue. Legal action mirrors media concerns over tech companies using journalistic content without permission.
> In May 2023 — a few days after the Pulitzer announcement — Quin sent Mississippi Today a notice of his intention to sue, citing the “embezzlement” remark.
Why are the journalists in trouble if the lawsuit is about something the CEO said?
>Bryant did not sue after the articles were published in April 2022, and, in fact, the statute of limitations on defamation claims in Mississippi lapses after one year. But in February 2023, the CEO of Mississippi Today, Mary Margaret White, mischaracterized the reporting at a journalism conference in Miami.
>“We’re the newsroom that broke the story about $77 million in welfare funds, intended for the poorest people in the poorest state in the nation, being embezzled by a former governor and his bureaucratic cronies and used on pet projects like a state-of-the-art volleyball stadium at Brett Favre’s alma mater,” she said in videotaped remarks.
>Embezzlement is a crime, and Bryant has never been charged, let alone convicted. There has been no indication he is a target of an ongoing federal investigation into the welfare fraud scandal.
>In May 2023 — a few days after the Pulitzer announcement — Quin sent Mississippi Today a notice of his intention to sue, citing the “embezzlement” remark. A week later, White issued a public apology, saying: “I misspoke at a recent media conference regarding the accusations against former Governor Phil Bryant in the $77 million welfare scandal. He has not been charged with any crime. My remark was inappropriate, and I sincerely apologize.”
For what it's worth, the former governor and his lawyer weren't satisfied with the apology and went forward with their lawsuit.
I see two sides to this. It's critical that journalistic sources be held in confidence, but it's also critical to guarantee presumption of innocence until proven guilty and that journalists don't abuse their position to spread slander.
That their entire investigation is now getting pulled in demonstrates just how stupid that CEO journalist was.
> [Nancy] New said that at a 2019 Christmas party, Bryant talked about Jake Vanlandingham, founder of the Florida-based biotech company Prevacus. “Governor Bryant got excited and told me that Jake had offered him ‘half the company,’ which I understood to mean a substantial amount of stock, but the Governor said he was going to have to wait until he was out of office to accept,” New wrote.
If you might recall, Brett Favre was paid $1M in speaking fees but never actually did any speeches and he advocated for government funds to be used to build a volleyball stadium at USM.
I really think the simplest defense here will be to just show that Bryant was complicit in the embezzlement just because it seems more likely than not:
> Bryant was governor from 2013 to 2020 and chose John Davis as director of the state Department of Human Services. Davis pleaded guilty in September 2022 to state and federal charges in a conspiracy to misspend tens of millions of dollars that were intended to help needy families in one of the poorest states in the U.S.
> Favre had publicly said he supported the Prevacus effort to develop a concussion drug, and the state's civil lawsuit says Favre invested more than $250,000 in the Florida-based company.
> “After the meeting, I asked John why he had committed so much funding so quickly,” New said in the court filing. “John said he had spoken with Governor Bryant and the Governor wanted Prevacus funded. John said the Governor was ‘all about this happening.’”
Now to be clear I'm not saying the governor is guilty of embezzlement. I'm just saying that it seems like everyone that he surrounded himself with seems to have been caught doing shady shit stealing from welfare funds & denying 90% of applicants to these programs. Since the former Governor makes Christianity a core part of his identity, might I remind him 1st Corinthians 15:33 "Bad company ruins good morals". And if I were the prosecutors, I'd make real sure there's no case at all against the governor cause it seems like there's some smoke there that can be fanned into a fire.
[1] https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2024/02/29/mississi...
Related
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange expected to plead guilty to felony charge
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act for publishing classified documents. Expected to serve 62-month sentence in Australia after legal battle and extradition process.
Julian Assange will plead guilty in deal with US and be freed from prison
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, to plead guilty to a felony charge, securing release from prison. Deal resolves legal battle over classified documents. Sentencing includes five years, matching time served.
EFF Statement on Assange Plea Deal
The Electronic Frontier Foundation expresses concern over Julian Assange's Espionage Act conviction, highlighting threats to press freedom. EFF urges safeguarding journalistic activities and preventing similar incidents.
Federal whistleblowers are entitled to damages of missed future pay, court rules
The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled federal whistleblowers can claim compensatory damages for future lost pay due to retaliation, without proving guaranteed future employment. This decision sets a precedent for whistleblower cases.
The Center for Investigative Reporting Is Suing OpenAI and Microsoft
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging unauthorized use of stories impacting relationships and revenue. Legal action mirrors media concerns over tech companies using journalistic content without permission.