July 12th, 2024

SpaceX's unmatched streak of perfection with the Falcon 9 rocket is over

SpaceX faced an upper stage engine failure during the Starlink 9-3 mission, causing satellites to deploy into a lower orbit. The incident may impact future crew launches, emphasizing the need to investigate and resolve the malfunction swiftly to maintain launch schedules and reliability.

Read original articleLink Icon
SpaceX's unmatched streak of perfection with the Falcon 9 rocket is over

SpaceX's streak of successful Falcon 9 rocket launches came to an end when an upper stage engine failure occurred during the Starlink 9-3 mission from California. The failure led to the deployment of Starlink satellites into a lower orbit than planned. Elon Musk confirmed the engine failure and mentioned a Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly event. The investigation into the failure could impact upcoming crew launches, including the Polaris Dawn mission and NASA's crew mission. While SpaceX can quickly replace the lost satellites, the focus is on understanding and resolving the engine malfunction to resume launches. The incident marks the first in-flight failure for SpaceX's Falcon rocket family since 2015, potentially affecting the company's launch schedule and customer missions. SpaceX's ability to swiftly address the issue and return to flight will be crucial in maintaining its high launch cadence and reliability.

Related

Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner

Astronauts stranded in space due to multiple issues with Boeing's Starliner

NASA and Boeing troubleshoot faults in Starliner, stranding astronauts on ISS. Return window closing in 45 days. Issues include helium leaks, thruster failures. Engineers aim for safe return amid past setbacks.

Astronauts stranded, multiple issues w Starliner – return flight window closing

Astronauts stranded, multiple issues w Starliner – return flight window closing

NASA and Boeing troubleshoot Starliner spacecraft issues, stranding astronauts on the ISS. Return delayed with ongoing problems like helium leaks and thruster failures. Engineers aim for safe resolution amid past setbacks.

Boeing, NASA consider extending astronauts' Starliner mission up to three months

Boeing, NASA consider extending astronauts' Starliner mission up to three months

Boeing and NASA may extend astronauts' stay on Starliner due to technical problems. Issues like helium leaks and thruster outages prompt ground tests. Despite setbacks, astronauts are safe on the ISS.

Chinese space firm unintentionally launches its new rocket

Chinese space firm unintentionally launches its new rocket

A Chinese space startup, Space Pioneer, faced a setback as its Tianlong-3 rocket malfunctioned during a test near Gongyi city. No casualties reported. The incident raised safety concerns due to the proximity to urban areas. Space Pioneer, known for its achievements, downplayed the event, emphasizing safety measures. The impact on future launches is uncertain. China's commercial space industry, inspired by SpaceX, continues to grow with significant investments.

Foust Forward: Who's afraid of the big bad Starship? – SpaceNews

Foust Forward: Who's afraid of the big bad Starship? – SpaceNews

SpaceX's Starship test flight sparks industry debates. ESA's skepticism about competitiveness, concerns on refueling needs for missions beyond low Earth orbit, and industry's recognition of SpaceX's innovation and competition.

Link Icon 12 comments
By @JumpCrisscross - 3 months
Modern rocketry is somewhere between WWI and WWII aviation. We’re beginning to mass manufacture, but the leading edge advances so quickly that learning curves have limited runtime. Alongside new designs, new materials are being invented and deployed across America and China (and to a limited degree Europe.)

Most importantly, we can tune risk and and reward across the production line; the crewed Falcon 9/Dragon launches are far more conservative than their Starlink + rideshare ones.

By @trompetenaccoun - 3 months
Tangentially related: Most journalists - especially in tech these days - seem to be doing practically no original or investigative work and simply rehash what they read on Twitter & co. Are there any decent apps that do the same thing? For example I'd like to say "Follow everything SpaceX-related from these primary sources and give me regular updates/summaries". I don't care to read people's opinions on it, just the aggregated raw info would be nice.
By @bell-cot - 3 months
> A few minutes after liftoff of SpaceX's Starlink 9-3 mission, veteran observers of SpaceX launches noticed an unusual build-up of ice around the top of the Merlin Vacuum engine, which consumes a propellant mixture of super-chilled kerosene and cryogenic liquid oxygen. [...]

> Numerous chunks of ice fell away from the rocket as the upper stage engine powered into orbit, but the Merlin Vacuum, or M-Vac, engine appeared to complete its first burn as planned. A leak in the oxidizer system or a problem with insulation could lead to ice accumulation, although the exact cause, and its possible link to the engine malfunction later in flight, will be the focus of SpaceX's investigation into the failure.

> A second burn with the upper stage engine was supposed to raise the perigee, or low point, of the rocket's orbit well above the atmosphere before releasing 20 Starlink satellites [...].

> "Upper stage restart to raise perigee resulted in an engine RUD for reasons currently unknown," Musk wrote...

For Falcon 9 manned launches, there are a whole series of abort modes and we-didn't-get-to-orbit splashdown locations:

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/05/examining-crew-drago...

It'd be interesting to know where in this mission's flight profile, if it had been manned, the launch director would have ordered an abort. That LOX leaks often lead to explosions is Rocket Science 101.

By @LorenDB - 3 months
300+ successful launches in an 8-year span is incredible.
By @jtwaleson - 3 months
I'd argue that going for 0 failures in virtually any domain will lead to inefficiency. You need some failures to get the feedback that you've "under-engineered" something. Without failures, you can guarantee that you've over-engineered it.

In a similar vein, I think proper risk acceptance policies shouldn't say "security/safety is our #1 priority", just like a good SLA doesn't guarantee 100% uptime. When you set a 99.9% uptime SLA, make sure you're actually down sometimes. When you want efficient rockets, you have to see some of them crash.

By @zitterbewegung - 3 months
It doesn’t take rocket science to understand that rockets eventually have a success rate of less than 100% . (Edited changed failure rate to success from child comment)
By @jmdeschamps - 3 months
Still unmatched, even if imperfect...
By @patrickwalton - 3 months
Amazing to me that it's not the reused element that failed. It's as though re-flying hardware that's already proven to work is more reliable!
By @m2fkxy - 3 months
bad week for upper stage engines!
By @seydor - 3 months
well i know ars is not using chatGPT because of the grammatical errors
By @sidcool - 3 months
Such a bad title to a story. "over" means they will never be able to create that streak again.