July 13th, 2024

YouTube lets you request removal of AI content that simulates your face or voice

YouTube's new policy allows users to request removal of AI-generated content mimicking their face or voice to address privacy concerns. Requests are assessed based on disclosure, identification, public interest, and sensitive behaviors. Content uploaders have 48 hours to respond to complaints.

Read original articleLink Icon
YouTube lets you request removal of AI content that simulates your face or voice

YouTube has introduced a new policy allowing users to request the removal of AI-generated content that mimics their face or voice. This change expands on YouTube's responsible AI agenda and aims to address privacy concerns. Users can now request takedowns of such content under YouTube's privacy request process. The platform will assess these requests based on various factors, including whether the content is disclosed as synthetic, if it uniquely identifies a person, and if it serves a public interest. YouTube will also consider if the AI content involves public figures engaging in sensitive behaviors. The company gives content uploaders 48 hours to respond to complaints, emphasizing the distinction between privacy and community guidelines violations. While YouTube supports AI use, it warns that labeling content as AI-generated does not guarantee protection from removal. The platform may take action against accounts with repeated privacy violations but assures that privacy complaints do not automatically result in penalties under community guidelines.

Related

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI

Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.

YouTube in talks with record labels over AI music deal

YouTube in talks with record labels over AI music deal

YouTube is in talks with major record labels to license AI tools replicating artists' music. Some artists are wary of devaluation concerns. Negotiations aim to involve select artists for AI music generation.

Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet

Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet

Google researchers warn about generative AI's negative impact on the internet, creating fake content blurring authenticity. Misuse includes manipulating human likeness, falsifying evidence, and influencing public opinion for profit. AI integration raises concerns.

YouTube's eraser tool removes copyrighted music without impacting other audio

YouTube's eraser tool removes copyrighted music without impacting other audio

YouTube introduces an eraser tool to remove copyrighted music from videos without affecting other audio elements. The AI-powered tool detects and preserves audio content, offering options to mute or trim segments for creators' convenience.

AI Is Ruining the Internet

AI Is Ruining the Internet

A teenager earns $21,000 monthly using AI tools on his phone, showcasing AI's impact on tech firms. Concerns arise over AI-generated content's accuracy verification, affecting human interaction online. Facebook's unsettling features and the challenge of addressing strange content are highlighted.

Link Icon 10 comments
By @worstspotgain - 3 months
This risks eventually degenerating into a mostly-indiscriminate process like DMCA takedowns, since it's costly to verify likeness, intent, and all that. They'll probably ironically end up using AI for verification, which could be defeated with enough skill or organization.
By @hnburnsy - 3 months
Why can't I just monetize and steal all the ad revenue if they use my face or voice, just like copyright holders can?
By @SuperNinKenDo - 3 months
Unfortunately this will simply be abused to take down videos that aren't AI generated, but which individuals consider disfavourable to their reputation. YouTube has made it clear they're not interested in providing a way to mediate conflicting claims in a non-Kafkaesque manner with the way they handle copyright claims.

I understand YouTube is in a very difficult position with that system, so I'm not even expressing anger, but I'm not hopeful that they're going to actually wade into mediating these kinds of claims sensibly either. You need to build institutional skills and processes and a culture of commitment to doing the hard yards on resolving these kinds of difficult issues, and YouTube has stayed away from doing that this long...

By @j16sdiz - 3 months
This is heading nowhere.

Online identity verification is NOT a solved problem. We will see fake take down request in no time.

By @bitnasty - 3 months
Like the current system, this one is not going to help the average user at all. This is for people (or other entities) with money and power.
By @sandworm101 - 3 months
Every person in the world has a doppelganger out there somewhere. Now we can all meet them through the magic of takedown requests.
By @wruza - 3 months
We know it’s gonna be abused by identity trolls, political movements, business competitors, big and small.

Good. And good timing.

People learned through years that ads are about sales, not products, and they are annoying. Now they will learn that speech is about what you ought to think, not what is true, and it’s full of bs. As my local ethnicity says: “kup suz buk suz” - many word crap word”. Sudden wisdom from a smaller culture.

AI will finally expose our built-in vulnerability and make it explicit. It was so default for millenia that you probably don’t even think about it, but now think about it: listening to voices long enough makes one coherent with what they say. Imagine your door lock giving up if someone pulls at the handle long enough. Or your dog growling at you after listening to a series of podcasts. Or you changing your views because Celeb Smart said something fifty hundred times. It’s been working all this time in favor of non-closing mouths, all they needed was your attention and enough time.

This had a cool (probably decisive) effect in primitive groups, because easy synchronization. But we are clearly, fundamentally dysfunctional in the internet era.

By @bushbaba - 3 months
Should be a by default opt out. Why do I even need to request this.
By @andrewstuart - 3 months
And political satire?

Is political satire allowed?