YouTube lets you request removal of AI content that simulates your face or voice
YouTube's new policy allows users to request removal of AI-generated content mimicking their face or voice to address privacy concerns. Requests are assessed based on disclosure, identification, public interest, and sensitive behaviors. Content uploaders have 48 hours to respond to complaints.
Read original articleYouTube has introduced a new policy allowing users to request the removal of AI-generated content that mimics their face or voice. This change expands on YouTube's responsible AI agenda and aims to address privacy concerns. Users can now request takedowns of such content under YouTube's privacy request process. The platform will assess these requests based on various factors, including whether the content is disclosed as synthetic, if it uniquely identifies a person, and if it serves a public interest. YouTube will also consider if the AI content involves public figures engaging in sensitive behaviors. The company gives content uploaders 48 hours to respond to complaints, emphasizing the distinction between privacy and community guidelines violations. While YouTube supports AI use, it warns that labeling content as AI-generated does not guarantee protection from removal. The platform may take action against accounts with repeated privacy violations but assures that privacy complaints do not automatically result in penalties under community guidelines.
Related
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
YouTube in talks with record labels over AI music deal
YouTube is in talks with major record labels to license AI tools replicating artists' music. Some artists are wary of devaluation concerns. Negotiations aim to involve select artists for AI music generation.
Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet
Google researchers warn about generative AI's negative impact on the internet, creating fake content blurring authenticity. Misuse includes manipulating human likeness, falsifying evidence, and influencing public opinion for profit. AI integration raises concerns.
YouTube's eraser tool removes copyrighted music without impacting other audio
YouTube introduces an eraser tool to remove copyrighted music from videos without affecting other audio elements. The AI-powered tool detects and preserves audio content, offering options to mute or trim segments for creators' convenience.
AI Is Ruining the Internet
A teenager earns $21,000 monthly using AI tools on his phone, showcasing AI's impact on tech firms. Concerns arise over AI-generated content's accuracy verification, affecting human interaction online. Facebook's unsettling features and the challenge of addressing strange content are highlighted.
I understand YouTube is in a very difficult position with that system, so I'm not even expressing anger, but I'm not hopeful that they're going to actually wade into mediating these kinds of claims sensibly either. You need to build institutional skills and processes and a culture of commitment to doing the hard yards on resolving these kinds of difficult issues, and YouTube has stayed away from doing that this long...
Online identity verification is NOT a solved problem. We will see fake take down request in no time.
Good. And good timing.
People learned through years that ads are about sales, not products, and they are annoying. Now they will learn that speech is about what you ought to think, not what is true, and it’s full of bs. As my local ethnicity says: “kup suz buk suz” - many word crap word”. Sudden wisdom from a smaller culture.
AI will finally expose our built-in vulnerability and make it explicit. It was so default for millenia that you probably don’t even think about it, but now think about it: listening to voices long enough makes one coherent with what they say. Imagine your door lock giving up if someone pulls at the handle long enough. Or your dog growling at you after listening to a series of podcasts. Or you changing your views because Celeb Smart said something fifty hundred times. It’s been working all this time in favor of non-closing mouths, all they needed was your attention and enough time.
This had a cool (probably decisive) effect in primitive groups, because easy synchronization. But we are clearly, fundamentally dysfunctional in the internet era.
Is political satire allowed?
Related
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
YouTube in talks with record labels over AI music deal
YouTube is in talks with major record labels to license AI tools replicating artists' music. Some artists are wary of devaluation concerns. Negotiations aim to involve select artists for AI music generation.
Google Researchers Publish Paper About How AI Is Ruining the Internet
Google researchers warn about generative AI's negative impact on the internet, creating fake content blurring authenticity. Misuse includes manipulating human likeness, falsifying evidence, and influencing public opinion for profit. AI integration raises concerns.
YouTube's eraser tool removes copyrighted music without impacting other audio
YouTube introduces an eraser tool to remove copyrighted music from videos without affecting other audio elements. The AI-powered tool detects and preserves audio content, offering options to mute or trim segments for creators' convenience.
AI Is Ruining the Internet
A teenager earns $21,000 monthly using AI tools on his phone, showcasing AI's impact on tech firms. Concerns arise over AI-generated content's accuracy verification, affecting human interaction online. Facebook's unsettling features and the challenge of addressing strange content are highlighted.