Can AI be an author? Federal Court asked to decide in new copyright case
The Federal Court of Canada is examining if AI can be an author under copyright law. A case challenges AI-created image registration, sparking debate on AI authorship and copyright law implications.
Read original articleThe Federal Court of Canada is facing a groundbreaking case questioning whether artificial intelligence (AI) can be considered an author under the country's copyright law. The case challenges the registration of an image created by combining a photo with a famous painting using AI. The University of Ottawa's Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic is leading the application to establish that only humans can be authors under the law. This case comes at a crucial time as AI-generated content becomes more prevalent. The debate over AI authorship is part of a larger discussion on how the Copyright Act should address artificial intelligence. The Canadian government is considering different approaches, including whether copyright protection should apply only to human-created works or extend to AI-generated content. The case highlights the complexities and implications of AI in the realm of copyright law, with significant implications for the future of creative works and intellectual property rights.
Related
Microsoft's AI boss Suleyman has a curious understanding of web copyright law
Microsoft's AI boss, Mustafa Suleyman, suggests open web content is free to copy, sparking copyright controversy. AI firms debate fair use of copyrighted material for training, highlighting legal complexities and intellectual property concerns.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
German court allows patents for AI-generated inventions
Germany's highest civil court allows AI-generated inventions to be patented, diverging from US and UK practices. The ruling permits a human inventor to be named despite AI involvement. The decision concerns a food container designed by AI DABUS using fractal geometry. The case highlights the necessity for legal evolution in response to AI advancements. For more information, visit www.artificialinventor.com.
OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free
OpenAI requests British Parliament to permit copyrighted material for AI training. Facing legal challenges from NYT and Authors Guild for alleged copyright infringement. Debate impacts AI development and copyright protection, raising concerns for content creators.
Copied Act would make removing AI digital watermarks illegal
The COPIED Act aims to protect creators by regulating AI-generated content through authentication standards and legal repercussions for unauthorized use, garnering support from industry groups for transparency and accountability.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_disp...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40833323
However, the extension to that is the Copyrights now. According to me, as long as the Idea creator is a Human, it should not matter if its AI and any LLM creating the art.
The human who gives the prompt may be the Author. This can be concerning but challenging for Legal.
Related
Microsoft's AI boss Suleyman has a curious understanding of web copyright law
Microsoft's AI boss, Mustafa Suleyman, suggests open web content is free to copy, sparking copyright controversy. AI firms debate fair use of copyrighted material for training, highlighting legal complexities and intellectual property concerns.
Microsoft says that it's okay to steal web content it because it's 'freeware.'
Microsoft's CEO of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, believes web content is "freeware" for AI training unless specified otherwise. This stance has sparked legal disputes and debates over copyright infringement and fair use in AI content creation.
German court allows patents for AI-generated inventions
Germany's highest civil court allows AI-generated inventions to be patented, diverging from US and UK practices. The ruling permits a human inventor to be named despite AI involvement. The decision concerns a food container designed by AI DABUS using fractal geometry. The case highlights the necessity for legal evolution in response to AI advancements. For more information, visit www.artificialinventor.com.
OpenAI pleads it can't make money with o using copyrighted material for free
OpenAI requests British Parliament to permit copyrighted material for AI training. Facing legal challenges from NYT and Authors Guild for alleged copyright infringement. Debate impacts AI development and copyright protection, raising concerns for content creators.
Copied Act would make removing AI digital watermarks illegal
The COPIED Act aims to protect creators by regulating AI-generated content through authentication standards and legal repercussions for unauthorized use, garnering support from industry groups for transparency and accountability.