July 14th, 2024

Ranked choice is 'the hot reform' in democracy. Here's what you should know

Roughly 50 American jurisdictions have adopted ranked choice voting, aiming to reduce toxicity, offer diverse ideas, and promote moderation. Alaska and Maine showcase benefits, but critics fear bias and confusion. Momentum grows with Nevada and Oregon considering adoption.

Read original articleLink Icon
Ranked choice is 'the hot reform' in democracy. Here's what you should know

Roughly 50 American voting jurisdictions have adopted ranked choice voting, with potential expansion in 2024. Advocates believe it can reduce political toxicity and offer a broader range of ideas, while skeptics fear increased voter confusion. Ranked choice voting allows voters to rank candidates, promoting moderation and diverse viewpoints. Alaska and Maine have successfully implemented this system, showcasing its benefits. However, some conservative groups argue it could favor left-leaning politicians and complicate the voting process. Critics question whether ranked choice voting truly reduces polarization or enhances democracy. While some experts remain cautious about its transformative potential, others highlight disparities in voter participation based on race and education. Despite resistance in some states, the momentum for ranked choice voting is growing, with Nevada and Oregon considering its adoption. The debate continues on whether this voting method truly addresses the challenges facing American democracy.

Related

Satisfaction with Democracy Has Declined in Recent Years in High-Income Nations

Satisfaction with Democracy Has Declined in Recent Years in High-Income Nations

A Pew Research Center survey shows declining satisfaction with democracy in high-income nations. Satisfaction dropped from 49% in 2021 to 36% in 2024, with notable decreases in countries like Canada, Germany, and the United States. Factors influencing dissatisfaction include perceptions of the economy, support for the governing party, education level, and age. Regional variations in satisfaction levels are evident across Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America.

About 3 in 10 Americans would seriously consider buying an electric vehicle

About 3 in 10 Americans would seriously consider buying an electric vehicle

Three in 10 Americans are considering buying an electric vehicle, with interest decreasing by 9% in a year. Factors include environmental benefits, cost, driving experience, and reliability. Democrats favor EVs more than Republicans.

Prediction Markets Suggest Replacing Biden

Prediction Markets Suggest Replacing Biden

Prediction markets indicate replacing Biden as the Democratic nominee might enhance electoral prospects by 10-15%. Despite technical objections and lack of clear advantage in polls, markets lean towards this change for potential victory.

Gallup: Confidence in higher education plunges to 36% from 57% in 2015

Gallup: Confidence in higher education plunges to 36% from 57% in 2015

Public confidence in higher education has declined to 36% from 57% in 2015. Surveys show a lack of ideological diversity among faculty, raising concerns about academic echo chambers and erosion of free speech. Calls for reform are needed.

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem [video]

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem [video]

The video discusses the importance of selecting a fair voting system for accurate representation in elections. It explores different systems, Arrow's theorem, and a scenario where one voter can dominate candidate rankings.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @josephcsible - 7 months
There's a lot of kinds of ranked-choice voting, but the one this article describes is instant-runoff voting. It's particularly bad in that it isn't even monotonic, i.e., you can lose an election because too many people voted for you. IMO, it's actually worse than the system we use today. I agree a different system could be better, but not this one. (My preference would be for either approval or score voting.)
By @creato - 7 months
I really wish the push had been for approval voting instead of ranked choice voting.

I think ranked choice is theoretically good, but it's relatively complicated, and complexity can lead to confusion which provides an opening for unscrupulous candidates (seems to be a much bigger problem than it used to be) to claim the results are illegitimate.

Approval voting is dead simple and seems to solve the same problem. I think it would be a lot harder to argue against approval voting.

By @namlem - 7 months
Ranked choice won't solve our problems. Approval voting, single transferrable votes, or mixed member proportional elections won't solve our problems. Elections have intractable problems, they cannot be solved because they are inherent to the process. The ancient Athenians understood this.

The way forward is sortition. Not randomly selecting people directly to office mind you, but convening deliberative citizens assemblies to directly weigh in on issues and even potentially to appoint officials to govern. There is a rising movement to implement such reforms that has started to gain a foothold in Ireland, France and Belgium.

Those who want to know more should look into the Sortition Foundation and DemocracyNext.

By @bediger4000 - 7 months
The USA is trending away from direct democracy, and majoritarian rule in general. I think the time has passed for any sort of reform to take place.