July 15th, 2024

IQM achieves 99.9% 2-qubit gate fidelity and 1 millisecond coherence time

IQM Quantum Computers achieves 99.9% fidelity in two-qubit gate operations, with T1 of 0.964 ms and T2 echo of 1.155 ms. These advancements showcase IQM's fabrication capabilities and potential for high-performance quantum processors.

Read original articleLink Icon
IQM achieves 99.9% 2-qubit gate fidelity and 1 millisecond coherence time

IQM Quantum Computers has achieved significant milestones in superconducting quantum computing technology. The company demonstrated a record 99.9% fidelity in two-qubit gate operations, essential for executing quantum algorithms. Additionally, they showcased a qubit relaxation time (T1) of 0.964 milliseconds and a dephasing time (T2 echo) of 1.155 milliseconds, indicating improved coherence times crucial for storing quantum information. These advancements highlight IQM's fabrication capabilities on par with leading institutions, enabling the development of high-performance quantum processors for complex applications. Dr. Juha Hassel, Vice President of Engineering, emphasized the company's technological leadership and potential for further advancements in quantum computing. IQM is actively exploring applications in various fields like machine learning, cybersecurity, and chemistry. The achievements follow the recent integration of a 20-qubit quantum processing unit in Germany's first hybrid quantum computer and the establishment of the IQM quantum data center in Munich. IQM's commitment to advancing quantum technology is evident through these groundbreaking developments.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @amluto - 9 months
This press release is IMO missing a critical metric: how long an operation takes. If you can run the thing at 1GHz (i.e. 1 operation on a given qubit or qubit pair per nanosecond), then this is awesome. If it’s one operation every millisecond, it’s rather less awesome. This is important for far more than the time a computation will take: it’s mandatory context for their coherence time numbers. For an actively operating computer, I don’t really care about the coherence time per se — I care how many operations I can do before the system decoheres, which affects how much error correction I need. Compare this to DRAM, which also decays (not in milliseconds unless it’s being Rowhammered, but still): the refresh process needs to be much, much faster than the decay.

You can maybe squint at their “sequence fidelity” and extract some information about this.

By @stingraycharles - 9 months
I am proficient with many things, but quantum computing is not it.

Anyone could provide some context on why this is significant and currently #3 on the front page?

By @ggm - 9 months
What's the rate of change in all three measures:

* Fidelity

* Qubit count

* Coherence time

Without a roadmap to some goal this is just random PR. What's the path to convergence of fidelity of volume qubits for sustained periods to achieve calculations?

By @cashsterling - 9 months
This is interesting progress but the key is actual computational benchmark performance such as quantum volume.

It is cool to achieve 99.9 2q fidelity... this is vitally important. And high coherence time is also important.

But you have to achieve "at least" this performance across all connected qubits, with 10's or 100's of qubits on chip, and get tolerant state prep and readout btw, while trying to perform useful quantum computing operations. The difference between this and what IQM announced is VASTLY different.

<-- was system engineer for a quantum computing company.

By @aszantu - 9 months
I want to see it play doom
By @tromp - 9 months
Maybe now they'll be able to factorize 3*5 with the general Shor's algorithm. AFAIK all previous quantum factorization records used precomputed knowledge of the factors.