Show HN: I graded HN on a11y wall of shame
The A11y Wall of Shame grades apps and websites on blind user accessibility. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Linkedin faced issues, while Mozilla, Github, and Jetbrains were praised. The list evaluates platforms like Youtube and Reddit, emphasizing the significance of inclusive design.
Read original article
The A11y Wall of Shame lists various apps and websites graded based on their accessibility for blind users. Companies like Google Sheets, Steam, Amazon, and Linkedin received poor grades due to issues with screen reader support, navigation, and design choices. On the other hand, Mozilla Firefox, Github, and Jetbrains IDEs were praised for their improved accessibility features. The list also includes feedback on platforms like Youtube, Discord, Reddit, and Hacker News, pointing out both positive and negative aspects of their accessibility. Additionally, guidance on testing apps using screen readers on different operating systems like Windows, Android, iOS, and macOS is provided. The summary highlights the importance of considering accessibility features for all users and the impact of design choices on the user experience.
Related
ChatGPT is biased against resumes with credentials that imply a disability
Researchers at the University of Washington found bias in ChatGPT, an AI tool for resume ranking, against disability-related credentials. Customizing the tool reduced bias, emphasizing the importance of addressing biases in AI systems for fair outcomes.
Socks, Lies, and Accessibility
The article exposes companies misusing Global Accessibility Awareness Day for shallow marketing, particularly involving accessiBe. It questions the sincerity of accessiBe's actions and emphasizes the importance of genuine accessibility efforts.
Fedora has been shipping with a broken screen reader for nine years
Fedora Linux distribution ships with a broken screen reader for nine years, revealing accessibility issues in tech. Debate ensues over responses from Fedora Project and advocate Aral Balkan faces backlash but remains dedicated to accessibility advocacy.
Readability: Google's Temple to Engineering Excellence
Google's strict readability process involves code approval by maintainers and readability mentors, shaping coding standards. Despite criticism, it enhances skills, maintains quality, and fosters global code consistency. A proposed "Readability Lite" aims for mentorship and quality without strict enforcement.
"GitHub" Is Starting to Feel Like Legacy Software
GitHub faces criticism for performance decline and feature issues like blame view rendering large files. Users find navigation challenging and core features neglected despite modernization efforts. Users consider exploring alternative platforms.
5 commentsRelated
ChatGPT is biased against resumes with credentials that imply a disability
Researchers at the University of Washington found bias in ChatGPT, an AI tool for resume ranking, against disability-related credentials. Customizing the tool reduced bias, emphasizing the importance of addressing biases in AI systems for fair outcomes.
Socks, Lies, and Accessibility
The article exposes companies misusing Global Accessibility Awareness Day for shallow marketing, particularly involving accessiBe. It questions the sincerity of accessiBe's actions and emphasizes the importance of genuine accessibility efforts.
Fedora has been shipping with a broken screen reader for nine years
Fedora Linux distribution ships with a broken screen reader for nine years, revealing accessibility issues in tech. Debate ensues over responses from Fedora Project and advocate Aral Balkan faces backlash but remains dedicated to accessibility advocacy.
Readability: Google's Temple to Engineering Excellence
Google's strict readability process involves code approval by maintainers and readability mentors, shaping coding standards. Despite criticism, it enhances skills, maintains quality, and fosters global code consistency. A proposed "Readability Lite" aims for mentorship and quality without strict enforcement.
"GitHub" Is Starting to Feel Like Legacy Software
GitHub faces criticism for performance decline and feature issues like blame view rendering large files. Users find navigation challenging and core features neglected despite modernization efforts. Users consider exploring alternative platforms.