July 17th, 2024

NOAA Is in Danger

Project 2025 proposes dismantling NOAA to commercialize weather forecasting, privatize functions, and shrink scientific research. Critics fear tiered access, conflicts of interest, and jeopardized weather services' accuracy and availability.

Read original articleLink Icon
NOAA Is in Danger

The article discusses Project 2025, a proposal by the Heritage Foundation that suggests dismantling the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the United States. The plan aims to commercialize weather forecasting, shrink NOAA's scientific-research arm, and privatize certain functions. Critics argue that privatizing weather services could lead to tiered access and potential conflicts of interest. The National Weather Service (NWS), a part of NOAA, plays a crucial role in issuing weather alerts and forecasts, aiding in emergency response during natural disasters. Privatization could jeopardize the NWS's partnerships and international collaborations, impacting the accuracy and availability of weather information. The article highlights concerns about the politicization of weather data and the potential consequences of defunding NOAA, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a robust public weather service for national security and disaster preparedness in the face of increasing extreme weather events.

Related

Weather forecast accuracy across US cities based on Weather Service gridded data

Weather forecast accuracy across US cities based on Weather Service gridded data

The Washington Post analyzed U.S. weather forecast accuracy, showing Miami's week-ahead precision contrasted with Paonia's 6°F errors. Forecasts impact agriculture, transportation, and safety, with coastal and arid areas proving more predictable.

Another Climate Truth Bomb

Another Climate Truth Bomb

Sabine Hossenfelder, a physicist, warns about rapid climate change progression. Predicts global collapse in 20 years. Urges attention to expert opinions and immediate action to address crisis.

Federal funding for major science agencies is at a 25 year low

Federal funding for major science agencies is at a 25 year low

Federal funding for major science agencies in the U.S. hits a 25-year low, affecting agencies like the National Science Foundation and NASA. Budget constraints hinder scientific workforce training and innovation amidst rising global competition.

Climate change is coming for hospitals

Climate change is coming for hospitals

Climate change poses a growing threat to hospitals globally, with a 41% increase in damage risk from 1990 to 2020. Recent incidents, like US hospital closures due to extreme weather, highlight the trend. Thousands of healthcare facilities worldwide face challenges, especially in low-lying coastal regions. Flooding, fires, and cyclones impact hospitals, with projections suggesting one in 12 hospitals may shut down by the century's end. Extreme heatwaves strain healthcare systems. Climate-resilient measures, like those in Vietnam, are crucial for hospital resilience.

We built our world for a climate that no longer exists

We built our world for a climate that no longer exists

The CNN opinion piece by Jeff Goodell discusses the inadequacy of current infrastructure in handling climate change effects. Urges immediate action for a sustainable and resilient world amidst escalating climate crisis.

Link Icon 16 comments
By @OutOfHere - 9 months
It's why I would never vote for them. Nothing surpasses the importance of our collective existence—not for one race or religion, but for all humanity, and for the only intelligent life we know exists in the universe. Anyone whose policies threaten our stability does not earn my vote. We are on a pale blue dot in the vastness of space, and we must honor our duty as caretakers of this planet. No amount of tax cuts can make up for it.
By @Carrok - 9 months
Is there anything beyond "vote and encourage others to vote" that an average American citizen could do to help prevent such a tragedy from occurring?
By @Joel_Mckay - 9 months
NOAA is a globally relevant working US service, and while one can live without eyes... it makes life more complicated when hurricanes pop up without warning.

As an organization it is data driven, where countless airlines, maritime shipping, and agricultural entities can't properly function without the service.

Any states that lose NOAA will also see just about every insurance premium balloon into the stratosphere.

Someone is letting the dog drive, lol =)

By @UncleOxidant - 9 months
If they do this maybe the blue states could absorb NOAA into some kind of sub-federal system to keep it alive until sanity can be restored? And then charge the red states for weather info - many of those red states are vulnerable to hurricanes & tornadoes.
By @josefritzishere - 9 months
That's only the beginning of what Project 2025 woudl dissolve. It's a fair debate what the worst ideas are in project 2025. It's 1984 and Mein Kampf rolled into one.
By @Cornbilly - 9 months
Because people don’t like to read the articles and I think it’s worth knowing…

Trump and the GOP already tried doing this in the last admin.

He tried to appoint the CEO of AccuWeather, who publically lobbied against NOAA, to the head of NOAA.

By @tomgp - 9 months
This would be an incredible act of vandalism. The hostility towards science, and specifically efforts to monitor and mitigate climate change, coming from the right of American politics is frankly terrifiying.
By @lmaoguy - 9 months
It’s not free, they print money, thereby devaluing the currency to pay for this.
By @insane_dreamer - 9 months
Losing the NOAA is sad, but if it saves money so we can cut taxes on high income earners, seems like a worthwhile trade off. /s
By @ofalkaed - 9 months
This seems like standard election year fear mongering and ignores much of what NOAA is and does while fixating on how it will affect the individual. Weather forecasts for you and me is just a side effect of their providing weather forecasts for all those air planes and boats along with keeping up to date information on various hazards like that new antenna tower planes need to watch out for or that a major storm system coming through the midwest is likely to cause a great deal of sediment to collect in certain areas of the Mississippi so decrease the load of your barges if you want to make it to New Orleans.

Business and international trade partners would put a great deal of pressure on any administration which threatened to screw with NOAA to this extent and I don't believe any administration would actually follow through with such a thing, it would have massive negative effect on trade and would probably cost the US far more than it would save. This is just politics exploiting that most people don't actually know what NOAA does.

By @Ekaros - 9 months
What is the problem. Isn't it well known that free market will provide better, cheaper and more efficient service? After all we trust free market with other things, so why not with weather forecasting?