July 20th, 2024

Mining JIT traces for missing optimizations with Z3

Using Z3, PyPy's JIT traces are analyzed to pinpoint inefficient integer operations for further optimization. By translating operations into Z3 formulas, redundancies are identified to enhance PyPy's JIT compiler efficiently.

Read original articleLink Icon
Mining JIT traces for missing optimizations with Z3

This post discusses using Z3 to identify missing optimizations in PyPy's JIT traces. By analyzing optimized traces of real benchmarks, Z3 can pinpoint inefficient integer operations that could have been optimized further. This method avoids the combinatorial explosion of trying all possible instruction sequences. The approach involves translating integer operations into Z3 formulas and identifying redundancies or constant results that could have been optimized. Examples include simplifying boolean operations and finding equivalent operations to save computation time. By synthesizing constants with Z3, potential optimizations can be uncovered, such as simplifying XOR operations or identifying relationships between variables. The post outlines a systematic process for mining JIT traces, detecting inefficiencies, and minimizing operations to enhance optimization. The ultimate goal is to improve PyPy's JIT compiler by addressing these missing optimizations.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @adsharma - 3 months
Why not do this at a higher level on the python source itself?

I ask because z3 has been used for type inference (Typpete) and for solving equations written in Python.

By @puzzledobserver - 3 months
How does the PyPy JIT compare to the JIT in the upcoming CPython 3.13?
By @gus_massa - 3 months
From the article:

> (x & c1) | (x & c1) == x & (c1 | c2)

Is this a typo? Shoud the second c1 be c2 instead?

By @aantix - 3 months
Compile enough traces with the accompanying optimizations and you have solid training data for an LLM that can suggest optimizations based on JIT traces.