July 20th, 2024

Intel vs. Samsung vs. TSMC

Competition intensifies among Intel, Samsung, and TSMC in the foundry industry. Focus on 3D transistors, AI/ML applications, and chiplet assemblies drives advancements in chip technology for high-performance, low-power solutions.

Read original articleLink Icon
PackagingComplexityMonopoly
Intel vs. Samsung vs. TSMC

The competition between Intel, Samsung, and TSMC in the foundry industry is intensifying as they each pursue their own paths towards advancements in chip technology. All three companies are focusing on 3D transistors and packages, with plans for transistor scaling down to the 18/16/14 angstrom range. The key drivers behind these advancements are AI/ML applications and the increasing data processing demands. The shift towards mass customization and heterogeneous chiplet assemblies is a significant development, requiring innovative connectivity schemes and engineering disciplines to work together effectively.

Intel, Samsung, and TSMC are all investing in various technologies such as EMIB, RDL bridges, and 3D-ICs to address the challenges of heat dissipation and complex chiplet integration. Each company has its own approach to connecting chiplets and enabling customization, with TSMC introducing a new language called 3Dblox for top-down design. The goal for these foundries is to offer more options for developing high-performance, low-power chips to meet the evolving needs of companies like Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Tesla. The future of chip design involves a mix of specialized and general-purpose processors at advanced process nodes to enhance performance and energy efficiency, particularly crucial for AI/ML applications.

AI: What people are saying
The article on competition among Intel, Samsung, and TSMC in the foundry industry sparks a discussion on various aspects of chip technology advancements.
  • Advanced packaging now requires similar precision and clean environments as chipmaking, with added complexity from microfluidics.
  • Chip design and manufacturing are seen as highly complex and almost magical processes.
  • There is interest in the development of chiplet/stacked die technology, with discussions on design and integration costs, and the challenges of multi-die design.
  • TSMC's description language is noted as an "open" standard, with references to resources for further information.
  • Speculation on the future of node shrinks and the potential for more granular marketing steps in semiconductor advancements.
Link Icon 11 comments
By @robertwt7 - 4 months
I didn't understand how crucial chip manufacturing is until reading the book "Chip War".. What an amazing book. This is probably one of the greatest, if not the greatest invention in the human history.
By @kurthr - 4 months
If the development of modern chiplet/stacked die is interesting, semiwiki also has interesting articles from some of the vendors including breakdowns of design and integration costs:

https://semiwiki.com/eda/synopsys/347420-the-immensity-of-so...

TSMC also discussed some of the challenges for multi-die design a month ago:

https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/tsmc/345909...

My take is that the rapid rise in heterogeneous solutions and complexity will provide some excess semi profitability, but at the cost of long run performance increases for "new nodes". Instead of one path forward there are now many.

Or the most recent:

https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/347646-tsmc...

By @sbstp - 4 months
Chip design & manufacturing is probably the closest thing we have to witchcraft as a species.
By @gradschoolfail - 4 months
The TSMC description language mentioned is an “open” standard.

https://3dblox.org/

https://resources.sw.siemens.com/en-US/video-simplified-phys...

By @nabla9 - 4 months
Packaging has become so advanced that they now need similar accuracy and clean rooms as the chipmaking itself. When they add microfluidics it becomes even more difficult.
By @AtlasBarfed - 4 months
So anyone want to hazard to guess if the node shrinks are going to go more than seven ignoring the half steps?

If the article is correct that the major semis are going to kind of forge their own paths, in my opinion, that means marketing lots of even 1/3 or quarter steps.

By @localfirst - 4 months
Imagine if TSMC is out of the picture. Samsung would have de facto monopoly over semiconductor chips.