July 20th, 2024

'Google says I'm a dead physicist': is the biggest search engine broken?

Google faces scrutiny over search result accuracy and reliability, with concerns about incorrect information and cluttered interface. Despite dominance in the search market, criticisms persist regarding data privacy and search quality.

Read original articleLink Icon
'Google says I'm a dead physicist': is the biggest search engine broken?

Google, the world's largest search engine, is facing scrutiny over the accuracy and reliability of its search results. Users have reported issues such as incorrect information in knowledge panels and a cluttered search interface that hinders finding relevant links. Despite criticisms and claims of deteriorating search quality, Google remains dominant in the global search market, holding a 90% share. The company's success story began with its innovative PageRank algorithm, which prioritized webpages based on quality and relevance. Over the years, Google expanded its services, collecting vast amounts of user data to personalize ads and generate revenue. However, concerns have been raised about Google's influence on social attitudes, politics, and businesses, as it wields significant power over online information. Critics point to challenges like combating spammers and the impact of search engine optimization practices on search result quality. Google's ongoing battle against spam and the emergence of AI-generated spam pose additional threats to the integrity of search results. Despite these challenges, Google's position as an essential internet infrastructure remains unchallenged, raising questions about trust and the company's commitment to providing accurate information.

Related

Perplexity's Grand Theft AI

Perplexity's Grand Theft AI

Perplexity, a search engine rivaling Google, faces criticism for being a middleman that undermines original sources' revenue by summarizing content unethically. The CEO's deceptive practices raise concerns about trust and integrity.

Google has been lying about their search results [video]

Google has been lying about their search results [video]

A leak from Google's GitHub shows the search algorithm tracks user clicks and time on pages, raising concerns about search result accuracy, treatment of smaller websites, and SEO strategies.

Google Search Ranks AI Spam Above Original Reporting in News Results

Google Search Ranks AI Spam Above Original Reporting in News Results

Google Search faces challenges as AI-generated spam surpasses original reporting in news results. Despite efforts to combat this issue, plagiarized articles with AI-generated illustrations dominate search rankings, raising concerns among SEO experts and original content creators.

Google's Nonconsensual Explicit Images Problem Is Getting Worse

Google's Nonconsensual Explicit Images Problem Is Getting Worse

Google is struggling with the rise of nonconsensual explicit image sharing online. Despite some efforts to help victims remove content, advocates push for stronger measures to protect privacy, citing the company's capability based on actions against child sexual abuse material.

Google Now Defaults to Not Indexing Your Content

Google Now Defaults to Not Indexing Your Content

Google has changed its indexing to prioritize unique, authoritative, and recognizable content. This selective approach may exclude smaller players, making visibility harder. Content creators face challenges adapting to Google's exclusive indexing, affecting search results.

Link Icon 18 comments
By @OkGoDoIt - 3 months
I renovated and reopened an old theater in San Francisco years ago. Google maps still lists my theater as “Chinatown's 1925 cinematic home to kung fu & opera films is closed but reopens for film festivals.” Which has not been accurate for a decade. I’ve claimed the location and updated everything I can of the Google maps description but this seems editorialized and there’s no place to edit it or mark it as invalid. I’ve tried reporting the listing multiple times but there’s no way to get a response from a human or get any changes made.

I know it’s not that related to the article but Google is broken and so many little ways, it’s not surprising it adds up to a slowly crumbling quality overall.

By @riiii - 3 months
It has been intentionally vandalized.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

By @paulmd - 3 months
Yes, definitely. This is the reason the summary box is telling you to eat glue - that’s what the top search results say, and the LLM dutifully summarizes.

Google has fucked up search so badly it is fucking up their AI ambitions. Very karmic.

It’s probably basically google-bombing for the modern era underneath. But the point is that search is now so broken that it can be pretty trivially google-bombed in 2024, at the exact moment the world needs it for RAG.

By @Terr_ - 3 months
> Nayak apologised, saying the panels were created automatically using algorithms and sometimes they messed up: “These are the kinds of things we’re constantly improving.”

A process or invention may be "constantly improving" by small and meaningless amounts without ever reaching a point that offsets the damage it does over its lifetime.

"Our toaster now uses 5% less asbestos, and we're passing on the savings to you!"

By @DocTomoe - 3 months
I once switched to Google, one day in '98, when they were basically ad-free, with good results.

I once switched away from Google, one day in '23, when the first seven results for many queries were 'sponsored', and shitty.

These days, I let LLMs answer most of my questions. They are sufficiently easy to use. For regular surfing, I rely on Kagi. Both services are pay for play, but my lifetime is not unlimited, and can be spent better than shifting through advertisements.

By @sircastor - 3 months
Yes, and it’s been broken for a long time. The crossroads of siting on one’s laurels and conflict of interest have resulted in Google’s results not being particularly good.

The only reason they remain on top (IMO) is that the dynamics of search, how information is published, and how people discover new information are rapidly changing.

By @reboot81 - 3 months
This is why I help my family and friends switch to ddg.gg https://spreadprivacy.com/is-duckduckgo-a-good-search-engine...
By @mrjin - 3 months
I depended a lot on Google search. Since Google start moving to the dark side, I was wondering when could I remove the dependency. It turned out the dependency removed itself.
By @yosito - 3 months
I have a relatively uncommon name. Way back in the beginning Google thought I was an 18th century English criminal. Then for a while in the 2010s I gave a shit about SEO and got my own website ranked first for my name. Then I quit caring and last time I checked, Google thinks I'm an 18th century criminal again.
By @vannevar - 3 months
Broken if you're trying to search for things, working great if you're an advertiser buying traffic.
By @bell-cot - 3 months
Yes, it's broken.

But when Google was young and wonderful, the web was a relative paradise, and rich with truthful (or at least well-intended) information.

Now, the web is mostly an SEO-optimized, Terminal-Stage Capitalist hellscape. Even the very best talents and intentions would find it extremely difficult to create a "good" search engine these days.

I mostly use non-Google search now. Even when it ain't better, I can imagine that I'm boosting the "people looking for less-sucky-than-Google search" stats.

By @eternal_braid - 3 months
https://you.com/search should be more popular.
By @linearrust - 3 months
My condolences.
By @talldayo - 3 months
> When I searched my name, there it was: a picture of my smiling face next to the text “Tom Faber was a physicist and publisher, and he was a university lecturer at Cambridge for 35 years”.

Good grief. Pal, you've got a name with 8 identifying alphanumeric characters. Of course it is going to collide with other identities on the openly-indexed internet.

By @louthy - 3 months
Even a stopped clock will be right twice per day. Google will be right about this eventually.