July 23rd, 2024

Alphabet Second Quarter 2024 Results

Alphabet's earnings report met EPS expectations but fell short on YouTube ad revenue. Revenue reached $84.74 billion, with Google Cloud surpassing $10 billion in revenue and "Other Bets" unit showing growth.

Read original articleLink Icon
Alphabet Second Quarter 2024 Results

Alphabet, Google's parent company, released its earnings report, meeting expectations for earnings per share but falling short on YouTube ad revenue. The company reported earnings of $1.89 per share compared to the expected $1.84, with revenue reaching $84.74 billion against the estimated $84.19 billion. Despite missing on YouTube ad revenue, Alphabet saw a 14% increase in revenue year-over-year, driven by search and cloud services. Google Cloud revenue exceeded $10 billion for the first time, with operating profit surpassing $1 billion. Ad revenue reached $64.62 billion, up from $58.14 billion the previous year. The "Other Bets" unit, including Waymo, the self-driving car company, generated $365 million, showing growth from $285 million a year ago. Alphabet's shares rose approximately 1% following the report. Additionally, during the quarter, Alphabet expanded its self-driving car service, Waymo, to all San Francisco users, marking its second citywide rollout after its debut in the Phoenix metropolitan area in 2020.

Link Icon 8 comments
By @paxys - 3 months
It's wild that Youtube makes $8.7B in ad revenue a quarter, and adding in another $15B from subscriptions it is touching on $50 billion in annual revenue.

Which is more than:

* Netflix – $36.3B

* Warner Bros Discovery – $40.57B

* Paramount Global (ViacomCBS) – $30B

* Disney Entertainment (excluding theme parks and sports) – $40.6B

All without spending a single dollar on content creation.

By @prng2021 - 3 months
I just listened to their earnings webcast. It looks like it's going to be yet another earnings release season of tech companies spending billions on AI infrastructure with nothing to show for it. And they're promising continued levels of intense spending on compute. Sundar's comment was that it's better to overspend than underspend and fall behind the competition. Time to buy more NVIDIA.
By @refulgentis - 3 months
It's an odd feeling to have seen the rapid decline of QoL on the interior, know it was to drive margins back above 30% / $25B/quarter, leave because of it, then profit from it. Feels unethical.

I guess that feeling is just having the dissonance of the nature of business in your face. Though I do hold that the decisions made to squeak out a couple extra % points will be crushing in the long run.

Even just today: reality is Google is 4th place to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta in AI and its not really close.

Each individual step is arguable, but the cracks are there. And leadership is too MBA-y/trend-following to do anything about it. Ex. through August '22 the line was there was going to be a special pot of increased raises to combat all the talent leaving for Meta. Then once Mark started firing, all that went far away, promo quotas to manager level were dropped to ~0, there's ceremonial cullings weekly, and its not of managers.

Edit for child comment:

I respect what you're saying: I'd advise its better to invite conversation, than say its all a simple binary option, especially in the face of me pointing out the same thing.

Ex. morale is trash, outsourcing is rampant, virtually all new headcount is overseas, and _actual_ efficiency, productivity, is lower than it ever has been.

The more simplistic view would advise companies could just fire 90% of staff and go into maintenance mode, but for some reason, they never do.

Also, note that "efficiency" on HN arguments of this form means "get the managers / slackers out of the way" -- economic effiency means "profits are 0". Neither happened here. Never been a better time to be a manager, and slackers aren't going away, if their slacking was visible to managers, they would have been gone already.

By @ChrisArchitect - 3 months
[dupe]

Some more discussion on official release: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41050218

By @arebop - 3 months
Interesting that investors don't care at all about the Waymo progress, judging by the q&a. Though, Tesla is definitely an AI market leader!