The self-fulfilling prophecy of React
Josh Collinsworth critiques React's dominance in front-end development, arguing it lags behind competitors like Vue and Svelte in performance and ease of use, urging developers to consider alternatives.
Read original articleIn a blog post, Josh Collinsworth critiques the widespread reliance on React in front-end development, arguing that its popularity does not equate to superiority. He acknowledges React's historical significance in shaping modern frameworks but contends that it has not kept pace with competitors like Vue, Svelte, and Solid in terms of performance, learning curve, and developer satisfaction. Collinsworth points out that while React is often the default choice for many developers, it may not be the best option for new projects due to its larger bundle size, slower performance, and complex learning requirements associated with JSX. He emphasizes that other frameworks often outperform React in various metrics, including speed and ease of use.
Collinsworth also discusses the implications of community size, suggesting that a larger community does not necessarily enhance the quality of a framework. He notes that while React has a significant backing from Facebook, other frameworks like Angular and Vue also have strong financial support. Despite React's dominance in job postings, he warns that choosing it solely for hireability may lead to long-term technical debt. Ultimately, he encourages developers to consider the specific needs of their projects and explore alternatives that may offer better performance and developer experience.
Related
New Web Development: Or, why Copilots and chatbots are bad for modern web dev
The analysis critiques Copilots, chatbots, and React for web development, citing slow sites, complex code, and high costs. It advocates for a shift to browser APIs, CSS, and HTML for better performance and lower expenses. Transition challenges include finding developers skilled in vanilla JavaScript. Organizations are urged to prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and core web technology training.
Web Crap Has Taken Control
The article critiques React's dominance in web development, citing complexity, performance issues, and excessive dependencies. It questions industry reliance on React, package management challenges, and suggests reevaluating development tools for efficiency.
Related
New Web Development: Or, why Copilots and chatbots are bad for modern web dev
The analysis critiques Copilots, chatbots, and React for web development, citing slow sites, complex code, and high costs. It advocates for a shift to browser APIs, CSS, and HTML for better performance and lower expenses. Transition challenges include finding developers skilled in vanilla JavaScript. Organizations are urged to prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and core web technology training.
Web Crap Has Taken Control
The article critiques React's dominance in web development, citing complexity, performance issues, and excessive dependencies. It questions industry reliance on React, package management challenges, and suggests reevaluating development tools for efficiency.