July 25th, 2024

Big Tech says AI is booming. Wall Street is starting to see a bubble

Big Tech's investment in AI is projected to reach $60 billion annually by 2026, but analysts doubt profitability, predicting only $20 billion in revenue, amid concerns about a potential investment bubble.

Read original articleLink Icon
Big Tech says AI is booming. Wall Street is starting to see a bubble

Big Tech companies are heavily investing in artificial intelligence (AI), with Wall Street analysts expressing concerns about a potential investment bubble. Analysts are questioning the profitability of AI, despite significant spending, with estimates suggesting that Big Tech could invest around $60 billion annually in AI by 2026 but only generate about $20 billion in revenue. This skepticism contrasts with previous optimistic forecasts about AI's potential to automate jobs and boost economic output. Major firms like Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia have seen their stock prices rise, but analysts warn that the technology is not yet mature enough to justify the massive investments.

While tech executives maintain that AI will transform industries, the current financial returns from AI investments are underwhelming. The venture capital landscape reflects this uncertainty, with a decline in returns from tech start-ups. Some analysts predict that many AI start-ups may not survive the current market conditions, while larger companies can sustain their investments longer. The overall sentiment is that while AI has transformative potential, the expectations surrounding its immediate profitability may be unrealistic. As the industry evolves, costs associated with AI development are expected to decrease, potentially leading to a more sustainable market in the future. However, the current landscape is marked by caution and skepticism regarding the long-term viability of AI investments.

Related

Goldman Sachs says the return on investment for AI might be disappointing

Goldman Sachs says the return on investment for AI might be disappointing

Goldman Sachs warns of potential disappointment in over $1 trillion AI investments by tech firms. High costs, performance limitations, and uncertainties around future cost reductions pose challenges for AI adoption.

Nvidia and Microsoft leap frogged Apple

Nvidia and Microsoft leap frogged Apple

Microsoft and Nvidia outpace Apple in market value through AI focus. Concerns on AI sustainability due to energy use. Investors demand real AI results, caution grows. Industry's success tied to energy efficiency and results delivery. Apple trails in AI competition.

AI industry needs to earn $600B per year to pay for hardware spend

AI industry needs to earn $600B per year to pay for hardware spend

The AI industry faces challenges to meet $600 billion annual revenue target to offset massive hardware investments. Concerns arise over profitability gap, urging companies to innovate and create value for sustainability.

AI 'useless,' creating a risky 'fake it till you make it' bubble

AI 'useless,' creating a risky 'fake it till you make it' bubble

Veteran market watcher James Ferguson warns about the AI market bubble, citing risks like false information creation and high energy consumption. He advises caution in investing in AI-related stocks, suggesting value in U.S. small-cap stocks post-bubble burst.

AI has created a 'fake it till you make it' bubble that could end in disaster

AI has created a 'fake it till you make it' bubble that could end in disaster

A market expert warns of AI hype likened to the dot-com bubble, citing concerns over inflated promises, questionable applications, and energy consumption. Caution advised for investors, with emphasis on traditional strategies.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @downrightmike - 4 months
IF the early gen: Alexa, is massively unprofitable, and VC money is burning to get the Current AI Rush going, I don't see how it is not a bubble. Real people and companies can't afford the real cost. People are just cheaper (tm).
By @1vuio0pswjnm7 - 4 months
""Despite its expensive price tag, the technology is nowhere near where it needs to be in order to be useful," Jim Covello, Goldman Sachs's most senior stock analyst and a 30-year veteran of covering tech companies, said in a recent report about AI. "Overbuilding things the world doesn't have use for, or is not ready for, typically ends badly.""

Who should I believe: (a) Goldman analyst with 30 years experience or (b) HN commenters who consistently dismiss any and all criticism of "AI".

Every criticism or iota of skepticism of "AI", even something as simple as "show me the money", gets countered on HN. It reminds me of the way HN commenters defend "crypto". It is like some sort of religion.

Every day, we have to wade through endless submissions about "AI". Yet an HN poll showed voters thought "AI" was overhyped.

I am going with (a).

Too much focus on "the future" while trying to deflect attention away from the present. Vapourware tactics.