July 25th, 2024

The most, and least, walkable cities

A study of 850 million people across 794 cities reveals global disparities in commuting, with North American cities showing low walkability and high car use, while Asian cities favor public transport.

Read original articleLink Icon
The most, and least, walkable cities

A recent study analyzing commuting patterns among 850 million people across 794 cities reveals significant global disparities in walkability and transportation preferences. The research indicates that over half of respondents still commute by car daily, with North American cities showing the lowest levels of active mobility, where less than 4% walk to work and only 5% use public transport. In contrast, major Asian cities exhibit high public transport usage, while European cities display a mix of commuting methods, with larger cities like London and Paris favoring public transport. The study, conducted by researchers Rafael Prieto-Curiel and Juan Pablo Ospina, focused on work-related travel and excluded data from the pandemic period to ensure consistency. The findings highlight that the 100 least active cities are predominantly in North America, attributed to long-standing pro-car policies. Quelimane, Mozambique, ranks as the most active city, with several European cities, particularly in Spain, also performing well. The research suggests that wealthier cities tend to have more car journeys, with a correlation indicating that doubling a city's income results in a 37% increase in car use. However, there is a growing trend among officials in affluent regions to promote car-free alternatives, as seen in cities like Singapore and Paris, where only 30% and 20% of residents drive to work, respectively. Despite the rising number of cars globally, increasing congestion is prompting a shift towards more sustainable urban mobility solutions.

Related

True scale of carbon impact from long-distance travel revealed

True scale of carbon impact from long-distance travel revealed

Researchers at the University of Leeds highlight the carbon impact of long-distance travel, emphasizing its disproportionate contribution to emissions. Shifting short flights to rail travel could significantly reduce emissions.

London, Paris, Seoul Show Commuting Power of Fast Regional Rail

London, Paris, Seoul Show Commuting Power of Fast Regional Rail

Cities like London, Paris, and Seoul are leading with fast regional rail systems. London's new line boosted ridership, Seoul reduced travel times, and Delhi is constructing a rapid system. These systems aim to enhance commuting efficiency and expand travel areas. The trend prompts questions about the US adopting similar systems.

Cities Can Use Paris as a Model for Implementing Safer Street Infrastructure

Cities Can Use Paris as a Model for Implementing Safer Street Infrastructure

Cities like New York can learn from Paris's successful urban transportation policies, including congestion pricing and pedestrian-friendly initiatives, to improve residents' quality of life and transportation efficiency. Paris's approach involves transforming streets, limiting car speeds, creating car-free zones, and investing in non-car transportation modes. US cities can benefit from prioritizing pedestrians, alternative transportation modes, and congestion pricing for public transportation improvements, leading to reduced traffic and enhanced safety.

Efficient self-organization of informal public transport networks

Efficient self-organization of informal public transport networks

A study in Nature Communications compares informal and formal public transport networks globally. Informal systems in the Global South operate as efficiently as or better than centralized services in the Global North, challenging common perceptions.

America’s Transit Exceptionalism

America’s Transit Exceptionalism

America lags in advanced transit systems compared to global cities like Istanbul, London, Seoul, and Vienna. Lack of significant transit construction in major U.S. cities raises concerns about the country's transit development.

Link Icon 12 comments
By @systemtest - 7 months
I noticed Utrecht in the third place. Having worked there, I can agree with that. However, with Utrecht being so expensive to live in I experienced that most people that work in Utrecht, don't live there. They live in 'affordable' smaller cities and villages nearby. And with industrial estates like Papendorp and Science Park having sub-par public transit, those people often take the car. If you live in a place like Cothen, it is 19 minutes by car to Science Park or 53 minutes by public transit. Papendorp is over an hour by public transit and 18 minutes by car.

So while 75% of the people living in Utrecht are likely to travel to work by bicycle or even walking, I'd say that the people working in Utrecht are far less likely to travel there by bicycle, walking or even public transit. Resulting in daily heavy traffic on the nearby four highways of Utrecht (A2, A12, A28, A27)

By @mppm - 7 months
This is not so much about which cities are walkable, but a survey of how people actually do get around there. Big difference. I've browsed the dataset and Auckland rates as less "walkable" than Kuala Lumpur. Yes, Kiwis do get around by car a lot, but Auckland is still a perfectly pleasant, walkable city. On the other hand, I've never been in a more pedestrian-hostile place than KL.
By @pesenti - 7 months
Interactive visualization with free access: https://citiesmoving.com/visualizations/
By @throwaway22032 - 7 months
I don't think that an overall statistic works very well for this.

I live in London and I probably do split my time very roughly 1/3 ish across the three modes as stated.

But that's because I'm doing different things.

The tube is used to go into town, meet up with urban living friends, go to museums, visit specialist high end shops.

The car is used to go to larger stores like the supermarket, big shopping centres, DIY stores, to go out of town, go to the golf range, visit friends and family.

Walking gets me to the corner shop, to local friends, to the park, the last mile on public transport.

It's very walkable/cyclable, I just don't spend my life in a 1-5 mile radius.

By @kv85s - 7 months
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041202...

The triangular visualizations are kinda nifty.

By @its_ethan - 7 months
By @chung8123 - 7 months
The city/cities I have lived in would not be considered walkable by many people. The thing is if you want walkable you pick your location in the city to make it walkable for you. I have always been able to find a place that can cover a large % of my trips by foot. I love cars and still own them, I just prefer to run my errands on foot.
By @thriftwy - 7 months
Walking, scootering or taking transit to work became of considerable less interest to me once I became fully remote.

What is interesting to me now is whether my children will able to walk to school and back, since that one is not remote, and I hope it won't be.

By @joaquincabezas - 7 months
Correction (May 13th, 2024): A previous version of this article stated that two Spanish cities made the top ten. In fact, it was four. Sorry.

lol, I see what you did there

By @snapcaster - 7 months
Can someone summarize this for us? even with the archive link I can't see the data