The most, and least, walkable cities
A study of 850 million people across 794 cities reveals global disparities in commuting, with North American cities showing low walkability and high car use, while Asian cities favor public transport.
Read original articleA recent study analyzing commuting patterns among 850 million people across 794 cities reveals significant global disparities in walkability and transportation preferences. The research indicates that over half of respondents still commute by car daily, with North American cities showing the lowest levels of active mobility, where less than 4% walk to work and only 5% use public transport. In contrast, major Asian cities exhibit high public transport usage, while European cities display a mix of commuting methods, with larger cities like London and Paris favoring public transport. The study, conducted by researchers Rafael Prieto-Curiel and Juan Pablo Ospina, focused on work-related travel and excluded data from the pandemic period to ensure consistency. The findings highlight that the 100 least active cities are predominantly in North America, attributed to long-standing pro-car policies. Quelimane, Mozambique, ranks as the most active city, with several European cities, particularly in Spain, also performing well. The research suggests that wealthier cities tend to have more car journeys, with a correlation indicating that doubling a city's income results in a 37% increase in car use. However, there is a growing trend among officials in affluent regions to promote car-free alternatives, as seen in cities like Singapore and Paris, where only 30% and 20% of residents drive to work, respectively. Despite the rising number of cars globally, increasing congestion is prompting a shift towards more sustainable urban mobility solutions.
Related
True scale of carbon impact from long-distance travel revealed
Researchers at the University of Leeds highlight the carbon impact of long-distance travel, emphasizing its disproportionate contribution to emissions. Shifting short flights to rail travel could significantly reduce emissions.
London, Paris, Seoul Show Commuting Power of Fast Regional Rail
Cities like London, Paris, and Seoul are leading with fast regional rail systems. London's new line boosted ridership, Seoul reduced travel times, and Delhi is constructing a rapid system. These systems aim to enhance commuting efficiency and expand travel areas. The trend prompts questions about the US adopting similar systems.
Cities Can Use Paris as a Model for Implementing Safer Street Infrastructure
Cities like New York can learn from Paris's successful urban transportation policies, including congestion pricing and pedestrian-friendly initiatives, to improve residents' quality of life and transportation efficiency. Paris's approach involves transforming streets, limiting car speeds, creating car-free zones, and investing in non-car transportation modes. US cities can benefit from prioritizing pedestrians, alternative transportation modes, and congestion pricing for public transportation improvements, leading to reduced traffic and enhanced safety.
Efficient self-organization of informal public transport networks
A study in Nature Communications compares informal and formal public transport networks globally. Informal systems in the Global South operate as efficiently as or better than centralized services in the Global North, challenging common perceptions.
America’s Transit Exceptionalism
America lags in advanced transit systems compared to global cities like Istanbul, London, Seoul, and Vienna. Lack of significant transit construction in major U.S. cities raises concerns about the country's transit development.
So while 75% of the people living in Utrecht are likely to travel to work by bicycle or even walking, I'd say that the people working in Utrecht are far less likely to travel there by bicycle, walking or even public transit. Resulting in daily heavy traffic on the nearby four highways of Utrecht (A2, A12, A28, A27)
I live in London and I probably do split my time very roughly 1/3 ish across the three modes as stated.
But that's because I'm doing different things.
The tube is used to go into town, meet up with urban living friends, go to museums, visit specialist high end shops.
The car is used to go to larger stores like the supermarket, big shopping centres, DIY stores, to go out of town, go to the golf range, visit friends and family.
Walking gets me to the corner shop, to local friends, to the park, the last mile on public transport.
It's very walkable/cyclable, I just don't spend my life in a 1-5 mile radius.
The triangular visualizations are kinda nifty.
What is interesting to me now is whether my children will able to walk to school and back, since that one is not remote, and I hope it won't be.
lol, I see what you did there
Related
True scale of carbon impact from long-distance travel revealed
Researchers at the University of Leeds highlight the carbon impact of long-distance travel, emphasizing its disproportionate contribution to emissions. Shifting short flights to rail travel could significantly reduce emissions.
London, Paris, Seoul Show Commuting Power of Fast Regional Rail
Cities like London, Paris, and Seoul are leading with fast regional rail systems. London's new line boosted ridership, Seoul reduced travel times, and Delhi is constructing a rapid system. These systems aim to enhance commuting efficiency and expand travel areas. The trend prompts questions about the US adopting similar systems.
Cities Can Use Paris as a Model for Implementing Safer Street Infrastructure
Cities like New York can learn from Paris's successful urban transportation policies, including congestion pricing and pedestrian-friendly initiatives, to improve residents' quality of life and transportation efficiency. Paris's approach involves transforming streets, limiting car speeds, creating car-free zones, and investing in non-car transportation modes. US cities can benefit from prioritizing pedestrians, alternative transportation modes, and congestion pricing for public transportation improvements, leading to reduced traffic and enhanced safety.
Efficient self-organization of informal public transport networks
A study in Nature Communications compares informal and formal public transport networks globally. Informal systems in the Global South operate as efficiently as or better than centralized services in the Global North, challenging common perceptions.
America’s Transit Exceptionalism
America lags in advanced transit systems compared to global cities like Istanbul, London, Seoul, and Vienna. Lack of significant transit construction in major U.S. cities raises concerns about the country's transit development.