July 25th, 2024

Federal judge upholds FTC ban on noncompete agreements

A federal judge upheld the FTC's ban on noncompete agreements, affecting 30 million U.S. workers. ATS Tree Services plans to contest the ruling amid ongoing legal disputes over the FTC's authority.

Read original articleLink Icon
Federal judge upholds FTC ban on noncompete agreements

A federal judge has upheld the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) ban on noncompete agreements, rejecting a challenge from ATS Tree Services. The FTC's rule, effective September 4, prohibits new noncompete agreements and mandates that companies inform current and former employees that existing agreements will not be enforced, with exceptions for senior executives. Approximately 30 million workers in the U.S. are currently bound by such agreements, which span various industries. U.S. District Judge Kelley Hodge affirmed the FTC's authority under the 1914 Federal Trade Commission Act to regulate unfair competition practices, stating that the ban is necessary to enhance worker mobility and economic growth. ATS Tree Services argued that the ban would harm their business model, which relies on noncompete agreements to protect employee training investments. The company expressed disappointment in the ruling and plans to continue contesting the FTC's authority. In a related case, a Texas federal judge has temporarily blocked the FTC from enforcing the rule against a coalition of business groups, with a decision on the merits expected by August 30, 2024. The conflicting rulings highlight ongoing legal disputes regarding the FTC's regulatory powers and the future of noncompete agreements in the workforce.

Related

Judge delays ban on noncompete agreements for employees

Judge delays ban on noncompete agreements for employees

A federal judge delays noncompete ban for select employers, questioning FTC's authority. The ban aims to prevent job restrictions, but faces opposition from US Chamber of Commerce. Efforts ongoing to block ban nationwide.

Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes

Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes

A federal judge in Texas partially blocks the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing harm to businesses. The ruling delays the ban's enforcement for plaintiffs, questioning the FTC's authority. Noncompete debate continues between job flexibility advocates and confidentiality protection supporters.

Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes

Federal judge partially blocks U.S. ban on noncompetes

A federal judge in Texas partially blocked the U.S. government's ban on noncompete agreements, citing plaintiffs' likelihood of success and public interest. The FTC's ban aimed to enhance job mobility and competition.

Judge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreements

Judge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreements

A Texas judge ruled FTC lacks authority to ban noncompete agreements, casting doubt on enforcement. Lawsuit questions FTC's rulemaking power. Final ruling expected by August 30, impacting enforcement on September 4.

FTC Warns Companies to Stop Warranty Practices Harming Consumers Right to Repair

FTC Warns Companies to Stop Warranty Practices Harming Consumers Right to Repair

The FTC issued warning letters to companies for warranty practices potentially violating consumer rights. Concerns include restrictions on repair options and warranty void stickers. Companies must comply within 30 days to avoid enforcement actions.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @glzone1 - 3 months
Headline is not accurate. Good for the ban still, but this was preliminary stuff and there are going to be conflicting rulings on this almost certainly. The rule is very broad, affecting senior execs etc.

My instinct is a somewhat narrower scope ban might have had a better chance of surviving? 80% of bans are totally overbroad and silly (affecting folks not earning > $150K). > $150 - $200K some kind of provisions (ie, up to 3 or 6 months gardening leave max) would be in line with some international approaches. This time is still paid for by the employer, and is due even if employee quits.

By @ChrisArchitect - 3 months
By @newprint - 3 months
yes !!! My only concern is that trump administration will try to reverse the decision.
By @ungreased0675 - 3 months
I’m a little surprised a libertarian group is bringing this lawsuit. Doesn’t really match my understanding of libertarian principles.