July 27th, 2024

From Trees to Tables: Storing Hierarchical Data in Relational Databases

The article reviews three techniques for storing hierarchical data in relational databases: Adjacency List, Nested Sets, and Materialized Path, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, and suitability for different use cases.

Read original articleLink Icon
From Trees to Tables: Storing Hierarchical Data in Relational Databases

The article discusses methods for storing and querying hierarchical data in relational databases, focusing on three techniques: Adjacency List, Nested Sets, and Materialized Path. The Adjacency List is a straightforward method where each row references its parent, but it can lead to performance issues, especially with recursive queries for retrieving descendants. The Nested Sets technique improves efficiency by using two indices (left and right) to represent the hierarchy, allowing for quick subtree retrieval and ancestor checks without recursion. However, it complicates insertions and deletions due to the need to update multiple nodes' indices. The Materialized Path approach stores the full path from the root to each node in a single column, simplifying updates and reads but potentially complicating subtree retrieval and ancestor checks. The choice of technique depends on specific use cases, such as data size, read/write frequency, and complexity of operations. In the author's case, with a large dataset and more frequent reads than writes, the Materialized Path was selected for its simplicity and performance benefits. The article emphasizes that there is no one-size-fits-all solution, and the best approach should be tailored to the unique requirements of the data and application.

Link Icon 0 comments