Elon Musk Shares Manipulated Harris Video, in Seeming Violation of X's Policies
Elon Musk shared a manipulated video of Vice President Kamala Harris, raising concerns about misleading content and compliance with X's policies against deceptive media, amid growing worries about deepfake technology's impact on democracy.
Read original articleElon Musk, the owner of the social media platform X, recently shared a manipulated video of Vice President Kamala Harris that alters her voice to make misleading statements about President Biden and her qualifications. The video, which was originally released by the Harris campaign, was edited to remove references to Donald Trump and to include misleading content, such as claims that Biden is senile. Musk reposted the video without a disclaimer, stating only, "This is amazing," which has raised concerns about compliance with X's policies against sharing deceptive media. Critics, including digital governance experts, have pointed out that Musk's actions appear to violate these policies, which prohibit synthetic or manipulated media that could mislead the public. The Harris campaign responded by emphasizing the importance of truthful representation in political discourse. The rise of deepfake technology has prompted alarm among pro-democracy groups, as such content can significantly impact voter behavior and the democratic process. The Federal Election Commission is considering amendments to clarify regulations regarding AI-generated political content, but the current law remains ambiguous. Other social media platforms, like Meta and Google, have stricter policies requiring clear labeling of manipulated media. Despite the backlash, Musk has not addressed the criticism or removed the post, which has garnered millions of views. His influence on X, with 191 million followers, allows him to amplify content rapidly, raising further concerns about the spread of misinformation in the lead-up to elections.
Related
Blue checks on X deceiving users into engaging with harmful material, EU says
The European Union warns Elon Musk's platform X for misleading users with verification marks, raising concerns over transparency and potential breaches of the Digital Services Act. X faces fines if issues persist.
EU says X's blue tick accounts deceive users
The European Union accuses Elon Musk's X platform of breaching content rules with a paid verification system. Investigations under the Digital Services Act may lead to fines and operational changes. Musk criticizes the DSA, while X defends its verification process. EU aims for a safe online environment.
Elon Musk's X pushes Trump tags on all US users
Elon Musk's platform X, formerly Twitter, showcases Trump campaign ads to U.S. users, bypassing blocks. Musk's support for Trump raises concerns about platform neutrality and misinformation spread, contradicting earlier claims.
Elon Musk's X pushes Trump tags on all US users
Elon Musk's platform, X, showcases Trump campaign ads to all U.S. users, even those who blocked Trump-related content. Despite past neutrality claims, X now promotes Trump's campaign, contradicting Musk's earlier stance.
Secret Service flagged as Elon Musk shares AI video of 'Trump murdering Biden'
Elon Musk faced backlash for sharing an AI video on his platform depicting Donald Trump killing Joe Biden. Critics condemned Musk for promoting violence and division, sparking a debate on content moderation and online influence.
While it doesn't say 'satire' or not real it's kind of obviously satire to me at any rate within the first few seconds. Guess this stuff can be a grey area especially if it's more subtle.
By the way the original video post had "Kamala Harris Campaign Ad PARODY" written on it but Musk removed that when he reposted. (https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1816826660089733492)
There's a bit of challenge for binary content since those can't be compressed or optimized without breaking the hash, and many hosting platforms will make such changes. For that we need to advance perceptual hashing algos to the point where they only - and always - break on semantic differences.
[0] Caveat being getting the solution to be seamless enough for the not-so-tech-inclined to have little problem using it. And for the general public to get into the habit of verifying content.
On the other hand, this is one of the reasons why the platform is really becoming unusable for me. Not to mention everyday i'm "followed" by 5-10 bots. And I get recommended a lot of posts about right wing posters that I have no interest in seeing. I mean, ofc, I don't have to use the fyp but I do wonder if there's manipulation of the algorithm going on. I don't follow any accounts that are right-wing aligned.
Related
Blue checks on X deceiving users into engaging with harmful material, EU says
The European Union warns Elon Musk's platform X for misleading users with verification marks, raising concerns over transparency and potential breaches of the Digital Services Act. X faces fines if issues persist.
EU says X's blue tick accounts deceive users
The European Union accuses Elon Musk's X platform of breaching content rules with a paid verification system. Investigations under the Digital Services Act may lead to fines and operational changes. Musk criticizes the DSA, while X defends its verification process. EU aims for a safe online environment.
Elon Musk's X pushes Trump tags on all US users
Elon Musk's platform X, formerly Twitter, showcases Trump campaign ads to U.S. users, bypassing blocks. Musk's support for Trump raises concerns about platform neutrality and misinformation spread, contradicting earlier claims.
Elon Musk's X pushes Trump tags on all US users
Elon Musk's platform, X, showcases Trump campaign ads to all U.S. users, even those who blocked Trump-related content. Despite past neutrality claims, X now promotes Trump's campaign, contradicting Musk's earlier stance.
Secret Service flagged as Elon Musk shares AI video of 'Trump murdering Biden'
Elon Musk faced backlash for sharing an AI video on his platform depicting Donald Trump killing Joe Biden. Critics condemned Musk for promoting violence and division, sparking a debate on content moderation and online influence.