July 29th, 2024

"Authentic" is dead. And so is "is dead."

Jason Cohen critiques overused marketing phrases like "authentic" and "game-changing," urging for specificity and concrete examples in communication. He encourages innovation and fresh ideas over clichés in writing and marketing.

Read original articleLink Icon
"Authentic" is dead. And so is "is dead."

The article by Jason Cohen argues that certain phrases and words, particularly "authentic," have become overused and meaningless in marketing and writing. He criticizes these terms for being lazy and unoriginal, suggesting they should only be used in a mocking context. Cohen lists numerous phrases that have lost their impact due to repetition, such as "the leading provider" and "game-changing." He emphasizes that while these words may have once held value, their misuse has rendered them ineffective. Instead of relying on these clichés, he advocates for specificity in communication. For example, rather than saying a product is "easy," one should describe it as "so straightforward, you won’t need a manual." He encourages businesses to demonstrate their claims through concrete examples, such as showing customer testimonials or performance metrics, rather than making vague assertions. Cohen also suggests that companies can still use these tired phrases if they can back them up with genuine actions and results. He concludes by urging readers to innovate and lead with fresh ideas rather than following outdated trends, emphasizing that the best ideas often come from synthesizing existing concepts with new insights. The article serves as a call to action for marketers and writers to elevate their communication by avoiding clichés and focusing on meaningful, specific language.

Link Icon 15 comments
By @dwaltrip - 6 months
The words aren’t the problem, it’s the authenticity of the speaker.

Which is why marketing sucks. The person is literally being paid to say the words. As fake as it gets.

By @agallant - 6 months
The takeaway (that obfuscation is bad and specificity is valuable) is clear and uncontroversial. But an issue is that nearly every suggestion entails lengthening your prose.

There is a time and place for precision, and there is also one for concision. Marketing speak is dangerous not due to brevity but intent.

By @zokier - 6 months
> Instead of saying it’s fast, show a speed test (especially against competitors).

This is one of my pet peeves; projects claiming to be (blazingly *barfs*) fast, without some serious benchmarks to show it. Just don't.

By @sharkjacobs - 6 months
> A newly invented metaphor assists thought by evoking a visual image, while on the other hand a metaphor which is technically ‘dead’ (e. g. iron resolution) has in effect reverted to being an ordinary word and can generally be used without loss of vividness. But in between these two classes there is a huge dump of worn-out metaphors which have lost all evocative power and are merely used because they save people the trouble of inventing phrases for themselves. Examples are: Ring the changes on, take up the cudgels for, toe the line, ride roughshod over, stand shoulder to shoulder with, play into the hands of, no axe to grind, grist to the mill, fishing in troubled waters, on the order of the day, Achilles’ heel, swan song, hotbed.

https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel...

By @scblock - 6 months
The list of overused words and phrases is good and I agree with a lot of it, but the recommendations is just more of the same blather stated in a slightly different way. As dwaltrip says elsehwere in this thread, it's not the words per se, it's that we know you're lying.
By @medstrom - 6 months
Really liked one of the linked articles https://longform.asmartbear.com/opposite-test/ which grounds better for me why these phrases are supposed to be dead.
By @skybrian - 6 months
These words are over-used because they're powerful. Other powerful words include "universal," "always," "never," "forever," and "for everyone."

I wouldn't go so far as to say we should stop using them altogether, but they raise my suspicions. What claim is being made? What's the evidence? Do I believe that claim?

By @jtwoodhouse - 6 months
I get the author's screed here, but word choice really depends on the context. For instance, there aren't many synonyms or concise alternatives for the word "simple."

That said, it's healthy to spot your tired patterns or have then pointed out to you.

By @nonrandomstring - 6 months
There used to be an Emacs plugin called "artbollocks" for weeding out pretentious diction and weasel words. Anyone got recommendations for a more modern take?
By @Log_out_ - 6 months
Its all just hacking somebody elses head with signaling by in and outgroup. Up next websites generated to appeal to your ingroups mindset.
By @_def - 6 months
For learning what to use instead, subscribe to my monthly newsletter
By @curtisblaine - 6 months
I have a problem with "_ considered harmful".
By @mouse_ - 6 months
This sort of cultural treadmill only exists because of deceitful marketers. Put an end to marketing and we'll see culture retain its meaning again.

Contrary to the headline, in my opinion authenticity is not dead, it's -everything-. Whenever marketers stumble upon something authentic, they will deploy it and milk it for every last penny until people are so tired of it that it's meaningfully worthless. Then, marketers will move onto whatever has become authentic in its place. In the presence of marketing capital, nothing is safe, nothing can last, it will all be dried out and discarded.