July 30th, 2024

Basic – The Most Consequential Programming Language in the History of Computing

BASIC, created in 1964, made programming accessible to students and hobbyists, fostering interest in coding. Its legacy influences modern languages, despite its decline in popularity among professional developers.

Read original articleLink Icon
Basic – The Most Consequential Programming Language in the History of Computing

BASIC, a programming language created in 1964 by John Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz, revolutionized coding by making it accessible to a broader audience, particularly students and hobbyists. Before BASIC, programming was largely confined to elites using complex machine languages. BASIC's straightforward commands, such as IF, THEN, and INPUT, allowed users to engage with computers in a more intuitive way. This accessibility led to a surge in interest among young people in the 1970s and 1980s, who began creating games and applications, ultimately contributing to the development of the internet.

BASIC was notable for being an interpreted language, allowing immediate feedback as users could run their code instantly without the need for compilation. This fostered a culture of experimentation and sharing, as users freely exchanged code, leading to the first mass open-source culture. However, BASIC had limitations, particularly in graphics performance and the infamous GOTO command, which could lead to convoluted code structures.

Despite its decline in popularity with the rise of more modern programming languages, BASIC's influence remains significant. It laid the groundwork for many contemporary languages and programming practices. Today, while only a small percentage of professional developers use BASIC, its legacy endures, and many programmers still recall their early experiences with it as a magical introduction to the world of coding.

Link Icon 4 comments
By @breput - 5 months
He's not wrong.

Despite Edsger Dijkstra's infamous quote[0], it is a fact that most late Boomer/Gen X's first programming experience was probably with BASIC.

For some people, it ended at GOTO 10, but for others it was a springboard into 6502 machine language, and then degenerating into C or Pascal, and devolved from there. Everyone has to start somewhere and BASIC is fine by me.

[0] https://www.cs.scranton.edu/~mccloske/dijkstra_quotes.html

By @wduquette - 5 months
My first experience in programming was on DEC PDP-11 rebranded and sold as a kit by Heath as the H-11. My dad built it around 1976/77. It with a paper tape reader and punch, assembler and linker, and a BASIC interpreter. Later we upgraded it with a dual 8" floppy drive unit (as big as a tower PC case is now) and the Heath-branded version of DEC's RT-11 O/S. We had Assembler, Fortran, Focal,... and BASIC.

I learned to program by typing in games from Dave Ahl's original 101 BASIC Games, as published by DEC...which usually involved porting them from whatever dialect they were written in (there were several, all sold with different DEC systems) to the version we had. Younger folks shudder at the idea of spaghetti code; I've shuddered at the real thing.

I've used BASIC on the H-11, the Apple II, the CompuColor II, the Commodore Pet, the TRS-80, the DEC VAX, the Kaypro-4, the IBM PC, and some weird HP supermicro, the HP-98-mumble-mumble. In most cases I moved on to Pascal as soon as I could; but BASIC was the one that let me bootstrap myself into a career in software engineering.

By @dlachausse - 5 months
As a child QBasic was amazing. It came with fun example games (Nibbles and Gorillas), a friendly IDE, thorough online help, and batteries included to write just about anything you could want on a MS-DOS 5.0 PC. I spent so many hours tinkering with it.
By @deterministic - 5 months
I will argue that Python is the BASIC of today. Am I wrong? If yes why?