August 2nd, 2024

Quark Stars

Recent research indicates that very massive neutron stars may contain cores of deconfined quark matter, suggesting a new state of matter with potential implications for understanding extreme environments in astrophysics.

Read original articleLink Icon
FascinationCuriosityConfusion
Quark Stars

Recent research suggests that very massive neutron stars may contain cores composed of deconfined quark matter, a concept that has gained traction in astrophysics. Neutron stars typically have a core made of densely packed neutrons, but under extreme pressure, these neutrons can break down into quarks and gluons, forming what is known as quark matter. This phenomenon has been replicated in laboratory settings, such as at CERN, where high-energy collisions create a temporary quark-gluon plasma. However, the conditions within a neutron star are distinct, characterized by high pressure and lower temperatures.

A study published in Nature Communications indicates that the properties of massive neutron stars align with a model suggesting the presence of deconfined quark matter in their cores, with an estimated probability of 80%. This finding is intriguing, as it implies the existence of a new state of matter, potentially exhibiting conformal symmetry, where the matter appears similar regardless of the scale at which it is observed. This concept parallels critical points in phase transitions, such as the behavior of water at high temperatures and pressures, where the distinction between liquid and gas phases blurs. The implications of these findings could significantly enhance our understanding of the fundamental nature of matter in extreme environments.

AI: What people are saying
The discussion surrounding the article on neutron stars and quark matter reveals several intriguing themes and questions.
  • Commenters express fascination with the nature of neutron stars and the transition to quark matter, raising questions about the forces at play.
  • There are comparisons made to other states of matter, such as water at its critical point, highlighting the complexity of phase transitions.
  • Some participants share personal anecdotes related to quark stars, including experiences at conferences and recommendations for further learning.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of quark stars potentially collapsing into black holes and the associated physics.
  • Several comments reflect a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the scientific claims and the need for empirical validation.
Link Icon 12 comments
By @ndsipa_pomu - 6 months
As a layman, I find the idea of neutron and quark stars to be fascinating. What puzzles me though is what distinguishes a compressed mass of neutrons from unconfined quarks/gluons. I thought that the idea of a neutron having a "shell" with quarks inside it was just a visualisation tool, but the compressed neutrons must be providing some force to prevent them from collapsing further into unconfined quarks. That also raises the question of how the unconfined quarks/gluons provide a force to prevent collapse into black holes.
By @edem - 6 months
If you are interested in this topic then i __highly__ recommend the PBS Spacetime channel on YouTube: https://youtu.be/1Ou1MckZHTA?si=enfHtWOSa9BwYRZ-

where they discuss this topic and so much more. it is truly a gold mine on this topic!

By @cozzyd - 6 months
I was on microphone duty as a grad student at a conference that had a crackpot who sat in the front row and asked questions about quark stars no matter the topic of the talk. Unfortunately the chairpeople of the plenaries kept calling on them and I kept having to hand them the mic...
By @csours - 6 months
I wonder how this would interact with neutrinos?

It seems like a quark core would be predominated by the weak interaction, so it might be more opaque to neutrinos.

By @verisimi - 6 months
> Right at the critical point, water looks weird. It look like a blur of droplets floating in gas. But if you look at any droplet you’ll see it’s full of bubbles of gas. And if you look in any of these bubbles you see it’s full of droplets. As you keep zooming in, you keep seeing basically the same thing…. droplets of liquid in gas, bubbles of gas in liquid…. until you get down to the scale of atoms. So we say this stuff has ‘conformal symmetry’.

This is akin to a rather derided religious position: "it's turtles all the way down".

The problem with all these claims is that one has to accept that we have established this in CERN or wherever. Have we? Can I check? Is it just the turtles story?

By @cryptonector - 6 months
Quark stars might even be a stage on the way to collapse from neutron star to black hole. The collapse is fast, but not instantaneous, so what would those neutrons become once their degeneracy pressure is exceeded?
By @rbanffy - 6 months
> It’s not every day we find quintillions of tonnes of a new state of matter

In terms of size, it’d still be quite unimpressive. About the volume of a million matchboxes. Would fit in a truck.

By @CuriouslyC - 6 months
Wouldn't it be funny if black holes were actually made of quarks, with a core of some exotic higher form of quark we can't create in an accelerator.
By @ThouYS - 6 months
nice! just like the strong interaction material from the three body problem!
By @Modified3019 - 6 months
Off topic, but the reference to critical point of water reminded me of this lovely video from ages ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xyiqPgZVyw

The original link is now gone, and archive.org doesn’t have the other two videos, but I’m pretty sure I have them in my archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20080416125148/http://www.scienc...

By @quarkw - 6 months
This is an exceptionally fun read for me since my name is Quark! The terms "quark star" and "quark matter" are completely new to me so I'll have to do some reading!
By @delichon - 6 months
ChatGPT just told me that

  ... the Schwarzschild radius for a quark-gluon plasma with a mass of 10^12 kg is approximately 1.485x10^-15 meters, which is extremely small.
Extremely small is around the diameter of a proton. Which would mean that any quark star would a black hole. So this estimate must be wrong, right?