"20% for tech debt" doesn't work

The article discusses the challenges and pitfalls of implementing a "20% for tech debt" policy in startups. Initially, startups often prioritize rapid product development over technical considerations, leading to increased technical debt as the company grows. The idea of dedicating 20% of engineering capacity to address this debt is appealing, as it can improve code quality and team morale. However, several traps can undermine this approach. These include maintaining separate backlogs for product and tech tasks, which can obscure the business value of technical work; a lack of understanding from the organization about the importance of tech initiatives; diluted focus due to scattered efforts; the temptation to defer fixes; and the ineffectiveness of allocating limited time to significant projects. To maximize the benefits of the 20% policy, the article suggests integrating tech initiatives into the product roadmap, clearly communicating their value, structuring technical needs, and ensuring high standards from the outset. Ultimately, while the 20% approach can yield positive results, it requires careful planning and alignment with organizational goals.

- Startups often neglect technical debt in favor of rapid product development.

- The "20% for tech debt" policy can improve code quality but has several potential pitfalls.

- Maintaining separate backlogs for product and tech tasks can obscure their business value.

- Clear communication and integration of tech initiatives into the product roadmap are essential.

- High standards should be maintained from the beginning, even for MVPs.