August 7th, 2024

Susskind: String Theory Is Not the Theory of the Real World

Lenny Susskind expressed skepticism about string theory, stating it doesn't explain the real world, criticized oversimplified beliefs about supersymmetry, and emphasized responsible communication and uncertainty in theoretical physics' future.

Read original articleLink Icon
Susskind: String Theory Is Not the Theory of the Real World

In a recent interview, physicist Lenny Susskind expressed strong skepticism about string theory, stating unequivocally that it is not the theory of the real world. He acknowledged that while string theory has contributed to understanding the coexistence of gravitation and quantum mechanics, it has not successfully produced a viable theory of elementary particles. Susskind suggested that alternative "string-inspired" theories might hold potential, but emphasized the uncertainty surrounding their relevance. He criticized the notion that simply breaking supersymmetry would yield results, noting that decades of attempts have not succeeded. The discussion also touched on the hype surrounding string theory and the need for scientists to communicate more responsibly with the public. Susskind agreed that while excitement in the field is important, it is crucial to avoid misleading claims about the capabilities of string theory. He highlighted the tension between maintaining enthusiasm and ensuring accurate public understanding. The conversation raised questions about the future of theoretical physics, particularly regarding the direction young researchers should take if string theory is deemed unproductive.

- Lenny Susskind asserts that string theory is not the correct theory for understanding the real world.

- He acknowledges the uncertainty surrounding alternative "string-inspired" theories.

- Susskind criticizes the oversimplified belief that breaking supersymmetry will resolve issues in string theory.

- The importance of responsible communication about scientific theories to the public is emphasized.

- The future direction of theoretical physics remains uncertain, especially for new researchers.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @jfengel - 5 months
I find it weird how much of this is about science popularization. I have an undergrad degree in physics and don't consider myself qualified to have an opinion.

Nor do I see the point in having one. If they came tomorrow and said "yep, we just proved string theory", all I could do is shrug and say "good to know".

It feels more like people cheering on their favorite sports team than actual science.

By @ko27 - 5 months
Before anybody misinterprets Susskind opinion, String theory might not be, and probably isn't, the theory of the real world, but that doesn't mean it's not useful. The prevalent opinion amongst the physics community is that some parts of String theory are isomorphic to the theory of the real word whatever it might be (e.g. ADS/CFT correspondence).
By @jiggawatts - 5 months
String theory reminds me of the beta-amyloid theory for Alzheimer’s. Both have sucked up all of the research and funding into a likely dead end. Worse, they’ve both managed to exclude those trying to work on alternatives, partly because to go against these in-vogue approaches is to go against famous scientists with name recognition and funding control.
By @biomcgary - 5 months
As a teen in the mid-1990's, I wanted to be a physicist (hard science!), but after reading extensively about string theory, I decided to become a biologist. Squishy beats non-empirical.
By @lofaszvanitt - 5 months
Isn't this about a group of people who are way above their peers in brain capacity or just plain malignant, throwing some utter nonsense into the mix and watch in awe as their not so bright fellows jump on it like flies on rotten meat?