August 10th, 2024

Pursuits That Can't Scale

Anu Atluru's article highlights the tension between scalable success and the fulfillment found in non-scalable activities, suggesting that many entrepreneurs seek simpler pursuits to counteract stress and burnout.

Read original articleLink Icon
Pursuits That Can't Scale

The article "Pursuits That Can’t Scale" by Anu Atluru discusses the tension between the pursuit of scalable success and the fulfillment found in non-scalable activities. Atluru argues that while startup founders often focus on scalable growth, many eventually seek out pursuits that cannot scale, such as hobbies or small local businesses, as a form of therapy to counteract the stress and burnout associated with chasing large-scale success. The author reflects on the experiences of high-profile entrepreneurs, including Mark Zuckerberg, who, despite their achievements, find joy in personal, non-scalable endeavors. Atluru suggests that this shift is a natural response to the pressures of ambition and societal expectations, emphasizing the importance of grounding oneself in simpler, more manageable pursuits. The article concludes by encouraging individuals to embrace these non-scalable activities as a means of personal fulfillment and to avoid deferring them for a future that may never come.

- Pursuing scalable success can lead to burnout and stress.

- Many successful individuals eventually seek non-scalable activities for fulfillment.

- Engaging in hobbies or small businesses can provide a sense of grounding.

- The desire for scale often overshadows the value of simpler pursuits.

- Embracing non-scalable activities can enhance personal well-being and satisfaction.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @lukebuehler - 2 months
The arc described here reminds me of the “hero’s journey” where there are two distinct phases.

First, the going out and away to slay dragons, which is unnatural, corresponding the to the conquest of scale.

And then there is the return—a homecoming-where one applies the transformative lessons to one’s more local and immediate life.

The journey is not complete without the “return”.

By @kamikaz1k - 2 months
Zuck example was misleading I think. Since he’s been doing athletics since his teenage years, including combat sports (fencing and wrestling IIRC). His parents wanted him to be good at 3 sports, at least one of them being a team sport…I think.

Also, instead of “things that don’t scale”, I think it’s probably being more of a craftsman. Being at scale necessarily means “giving away your legos”[1]. Which can make your impact very detached. Being a craftsman brings you back. But idk, never been a CEO that’s scaled :)

1. https://review.firstround.com/give-away-your-legos-and-other...

By @JohnFen - 2 months
If you only do things that can scale, the universe of interesting and useful things that are possible to do gets much smaller.
By @jbs789 - 2 months
I view this all on a much more fundamentally human level. You figure out how to survive and how to be desirable as a mate fundamentally (however you define that success, social acceptance, admiration, status, cash, etc) then indulge in the other things (the curiosities). And then people weight priorities differently. “Scaling” is a proxy for that first bit - making money.
By @swader999 - 2 months
You can attempt things that don't scale, fail, learn and apply to things that do scale. It's a process, not always an outcome.
By @smitty1e - 2 months
To scale is to externalize, acquire population, and watch the 80/20 static-to-dynamic ratio slide leftward into inflexibility.