I Quit Spotify
The author quit Spotify due to frustrations with its updated interface, which prioritizes playlists over albums, leading to user alienation. They switched to Apple Music for a better experience.
Read original articleThe article discusses the author's decision to quit Spotify due to frustrations with its updated interface, which has made it increasingly difficult to find and enjoy music. The new design emphasizes playlists and algorithmically generated content over full albums, leading to a disorganized listening experience. Users have reported similar grievances, feeling that the platform encourages passive listening rather than active engagement with music. The author highlights a shift in Spotify's design philosophy from user-centered to corporation-centered, prioritizing profit over user experience. This change has contributed to a sense of alienation among long-term users, who feel that their relationship with music is being undermined. In search of a better experience, the author switched to Apple Music, which offers a more traditional library view and less intrusive recommendations. The article concludes by noting the challenges of finding alternatives in a market dominated by large tech companies.
- The updated Spotify interface has made it harder for users to find and enjoy music.
- Users report feeling alienated by the platform's focus on playlists and algorithmic suggestions.
- The design shift reflects a broader trend towards corporation-centered approaches in tech.
- The author switched to Apple Music for a more user-friendly experience.
- The article highlights the difficulty of finding alternatives in a market dominated by major tech firms.
Related
My Windows Computer Just Doesn't Feel Like Mine Anymore
The article discusses Windows 11's shift to a more commercial feel, with concerns about ads, updates, and lack of control. Users express frustration, preferring macOS or Linux for simplicity and customization.
The modern tech economy is based far too on making creators work for free
Creators face challenges in the tech economy, working for free due to high marketing costs and low returns. Diversifying income sources is crucial. Social media alters traditional earning methods, limiting access based on finances. Independent creators struggle against corporate dominance.
The music industry is engineering artist popularity
The music industry faces criticism for manipulating artist popularity on streaming platforms, particularly Spotify, raising concerns about transparency, fairness, and the authenticity of music recommendations amid perceived industry manipulation.
Monetization and Monopolies: How the Internet You Loved Died
The article argues that technology monopolies, like Apple, can drive innovation and provide societal benefits despite their decline, suggesting that dismantling them may not serve consumers' best interests.
Our Users Deserve a Bill of Rights
The author critiques the tech industry's neglect of end users, advocating for a "User Bill of Rights" to ensure accountability and balance between innovation and stability in software development.
They kept changing stuff, breaking my work flow, with every change it felt like there was more friction to listen to the music and podcasts I wanted, and less friction to listen to algorithmically selected slop I didn't want to listen to. Eventually I just said fuck it. I don't need this source of stress and frustration in my life. I've never looked back.
I'm on youtube music now. In many ways it's a worse product, but it at least stays the same and doesn't keep trying to make me change my listening behavior.
I suspect Spotify's problem is that they have (or had) too many developers, so you get this pressure to look busy "improving" the product, with endless lateral change as a result instead.
These days there are 10s of 1000s of radio stations with a web presence. From all over the world. Some have live DJs, some use automation, some have special syndicated programs. Over the years I've tried out many hundreds of them for an hour or two. Some are great! Many have multiple programs each day at regular times. It's a whole 'nother world. Some are college stations, some are long-time businesses like SOMA-FM.
I use VLC to listen to them (go to the 'Media' heading, select 'Open Media stream' and paste the URL ... instant play) , and to make a playlist to group stuff by genre or source-type.
Audio-quality-wise, if that's a concern, their bit-rates can vary from 50k to 320k. VLC can tell you that. Not a problem; if I don't like what I'm hearing today, I have lots of lossless favorites from my collection on a drive.
SOMA-FM has a great selection of genres you can try for starters. Or take a walk on the wild side by searching here [0], a site where all station info has been entered by users... including many that might be in your own neighborhood. Copy the URL and plug it into VLC.
Unlike Spotify, expert DJs select a wide range of music from genres that span the globe. Throughout the day, FIP curates an eclectic mix of genres—from jazz to rock, world music to classical—ensuring that I'm constantly exposed to various musical worlds without needing to curate or chase playlists myself.
FIP's programming is uninterrupted by DJs or ads, allowing for a seamless, immersive listening experience. The station's French commentary, when it occurs, adds a touch of charm without becoming a distraction, making it easy to "set it and forget it."
Do yourself a favour...
I found out the hard way that Spotify features tons of videos and that you cannot disable them. See for instance
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5KS759AlVGVj34OHPbcx1p
There's also ton of dubious stuff in the "ASMR" category you probably wouldn't want your kid have access to and that is not caught by the "Explicit" filter, see for instance (NSFW!)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/3AxgfSNuDgYnz54lT4jkmT
Needless to say, I immediately canceled the Spotify family account.
Many of the complaints in the OP apply to Sonos too though, we brought into it years ago, and are incredible disappointed with the recent changes.
> artists and labels can identify music that’s a priority for them... it won’t require any upfront budget. Instead, labels or rights holders agree to be paid a promotional recording royalty rate for streams in personalized listening sessions where we provided this service
"Payola" is the term for radio stations secretly charging labels to feature their songs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola
"Discovery Mode" is the modern structure. Instead of a station's single broadcast, it's many algorithmic playlists. Instead of the publisher paying up front because the radio and retailer are separate businesses, they just accept a lower royalty rate on plays because Spotify plays are the discovery and the sale together. Perhaps these differences and this press release is enough "disclosure" to avoid prosecution, I'm not a lawyer. I wish Spotify's internal legal analysis was public.
But all these gripes come back to: Spotify makes more money from this than when playing albums, curation, personal playlists, etc etc. There isn't a general issue of control or caring, there's a specific, nameable moneymaking "feature".
It got to the point where I couldn't figure out why on earth anyone would listen to radio when you can get all the music you like, with no ads, no news, and no Dave Doubledecks, for a few pounds a month. After a couple of weeks of using it, it started recommending music I'd never heard before, and really cool Scottish and Welsh folk music that the radio stations here would never touch, so I've discovered really cool stuff through it. I love that I can tell it never to show me certain artists - for instance, if I never heard Eminem again in my life it'd be too soon, so I've told it to never recommend any tracks by him, whereas local radio plays him incessantly.
For bonus fun count how many times it tries to interrupt you and have you listen to something cheaper, their in house podcasts or whatever the latest rap album they’re pushing is, despite that after tens of thousands of hours of listening they know you’ve never once chosen it or any adjacent genre.
Shameless promotion: rad is an auto D.J. that actually does follow your preferences https://rad.fm/
I want the ability to shuffle my library/play the latest releases/whatever while leaving albums intact.
I want to play the entirety of one album in order, then play another album in order, and so on.
Anyone know of an app that does this? I'll drop spotify today if some other streaming service can do this.
Spotify used to be cool and within the industry, the big example of engineering culture, agile with "the Spotify model" with squads and tribes etc. being able to adapt and ship stuff quickly.
But now somehow it seems they regressed into an organization that cannot ship basic features (stuff like lossless audio) for years, and that is more interested in pursuing legal action than in pursuing customers. Reading a book about why would be a good lesson for many people in IT.
Recently, I finally switched to Apple Music after discovering there is absolutely no way to disable video podcasts on child accounts and that because of that, Spotify search is full of TikTok compilations, Minecraft streamers, and straight up adult content that you absolutely can't disable for children. It's really terrible and unforgivable.
The good news is (1) I actually like Apple Music a lot more, even on Android and (2) switching took like 5 minutes using Soundiiz. It is a web app where you log into both services and it syncs your playlists and collections instantly. I have no connection to it and there are probably other similar services that might be just as good, but it worked really well for me and was worth the $5 or whatever I payed. I moved everyone in my family over to Apple Music and no one complained or lost any playlists.
Since being on Apple Music, it's really refreshing that they prioritize music features over dumb engagement features. They promote lossless audio and spatial audio remixes instead of trying to push paid podcasts and other junk you don't want. It also supports streaming your own local music that is not in their library. It is a really nice product.
Obviously both are giant companies who don't care about you, but Apple Music really seems like a better product to me made by people who actually listen to music.
Using the non-shuffling feature titled 'smart shuffle' is the most frustrated I have been using any software in my 30 years of life. If your connection speed is not on big US city level, accidentally toggling shuffle practically halts the application for minutes. Reference: https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Mobile-Other-Sma...
For credibility: there are 142,664 scrobbles saved on my last fm since 2013. I use the service a lot and wish I did not have to resort to modding tools like Spicetify for basic feature toggles. Way to ruin a wonderful product. If there was a 'Spotify but only the music you choose', I'd switch in an instant.
I think the only thing that really bothers me is that you might add a song or an album to your library but for some reason that doesn’t automatically add the artist to your library. I feel like they should all be interlinked.
I don’t use the desktop app at all though. Maybe the mobile app just has a better design?
- Spotify pays fractions of pennies per play to the artist ($0.00318)
- Apple Music pays about three times more ($0.008)
- Tidal pays more than Apple Music ($0.01284)
I picked Apple because I've got it anyway through Apple One, if I wasn't in The Ecosystem, I'd switch to Tidal since it integrates with PlexAmp directly.https://virpp.com/hello/music-streaming-payouts-comparison-a...
Does anyone here have experience with Tidal? I have heard good things about them.
I never understood people's fetishization of albums and "enjoying" an album and all the music app interfaces created around that. I just want a cloud or self hosted version of winamp, where jumping to the next song or queueing it up from my playlist is a hotkey away rather than 12 clicks on a crowded interface.
Been moving to navidrome but i expect to eventually need some workarounds to get what i want.
Edit: also the poor implementation that is smart shuffle and shoving it down my throat
shitification thats spotify.
I would like to see a HN inspired web site that lists all of the bands and musicians where we can click on a link and go directly to the band or musicians web site and buy or download the music directly from them.
No middle man earning a small fortune off the backs of those talented musicians.
Nowadays my Discover Weekly is nothing but "lo-fi" elevator music, despite my best efforts to dissuade it with the dislike button. Worse, if you click in to any of the artists of these songs they're all mysteriously vacant profiles with no social media connections or descriptions.
I absolutely despise Spotify as a company and have felt trapped by them for years so maybe I have an unreasonable bias against them in thinking this, but the thought crossed my mind that they're creating this slop themselves to suck up as many streaming minutes as possible to avoid paying real artists/producers.
Of course, it's also possible they're just turning a blind eye to abusers who generate this stuff and flood the platform looking for a quick buck. Mutually beneficial for them I guess.
Summary (thanks, Kagi!):
> a recent app update altered its interface, making it harder to navigate
Spotify constantly change their interface ever so slightly.
I personally often like the changes. I sometimes can't find things.
This is a really valid point of criticism, but not something everyone agrees is a bad thing.
> app shifts towards promoting playlists and algorithmically generated content over traditional albums
OK, this is the real reason.
I like the algorithmic recommendations.
It helps me discover electronic music which has a high similarity.
When algorithmic recommendations are not sufficient, and I have actual time on my hand to explore music, I browse the "Artists like this one..." directory, old-school style.
I mostly play "Liked songs" and explore recommendations on adventurous days.
> corporate profit over user experience
Isn't really an argument.
> feel increasingly alienated from their music, with algorithms dictating listening habits
If argument does not sound convincing, repeat the argument.
> diminishes the significance of entire albums
To be more precise, Spotify is changing the reward mechanism to favor singles over albums:
https://www.grizzlybeatz.com/lofi-hip-hop-blog/why-releasing...
I'm not convinced it's just a bad thing.
The landscape is changing.
People still make albums if they feel like it.
We missed an email about address verification, despite we living in the same place for many years and being a paid user for 15 years, and now my wife can’t rejoin the plan for a year.
Moving to Tidal, and perhaps starting buying CDs again.
Related
My Windows Computer Just Doesn't Feel Like Mine Anymore
The article discusses Windows 11's shift to a more commercial feel, with concerns about ads, updates, and lack of control. Users express frustration, preferring macOS or Linux for simplicity and customization.
The modern tech economy is based far too on making creators work for free
Creators face challenges in the tech economy, working for free due to high marketing costs and low returns. Diversifying income sources is crucial. Social media alters traditional earning methods, limiting access based on finances. Independent creators struggle against corporate dominance.
The music industry is engineering artist popularity
The music industry faces criticism for manipulating artist popularity on streaming platforms, particularly Spotify, raising concerns about transparency, fairness, and the authenticity of music recommendations amid perceived industry manipulation.
Monetization and Monopolies: How the Internet You Loved Died
The article argues that technology monopolies, like Apple, can drive innovation and provide societal benefits despite their decline, suggesting that dismantling them may not serve consumers' best interests.
Our Users Deserve a Bill of Rights
The author critiques the tech industry's neglect of end users, advocating for a "User Bill of Rights" to ensure accountability and balance between innovation and stability in software development.