August 13th, 2024

WHO to scrap weak PFAS drinking water guidelines after alleged corruption

The WHO plans to withdraw its lenient PFAS drinking water guidelines amid corruption allegations, initiating a new review with a revised panel, following criticism of their safety and influence on global standards.

Read original articleLink Icon
WHO to scrap weak PFAS drinking water guidelines after alleged corruption

The World Health Organization (WHO) plans to withdraw its controversial drinking water guidelines for PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), specifically PFOA and PFOS, following allegations of corruption in their development. Critics, including independent scientists, argue that the proposed guidelines were excessively lenient, allowing higher levels of these toxic chemicals in drinking water than those set by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The WHO's initial guidelines of 100 parts per trillion (ppt) were criticized for ignoring credible research and not adequately protecting human health. In response to the backlash, the WHO has initiated a new review of the scientific literature and disbanded the original panel of scientists, replacing them with a new group that includes fewer industry-affiliated members. This unprecedented move comes after significant criticism of the WHO's reliance on flawed studies and its dismissal of substantial health data regarding PFAS. The EPA has established a legal limit of four ppt for these substances, emphasizing that no level of exposure is considered safe. The WHO's guidelines, while non-binding, are influential in shaping legal limits worldwide, and their revision is seen as crucial for public health.

- WHO to withdraw lenient PFAS drinking water guidelines amid corruption allegations.

- Proposed guidelines allowed higher PFAS levels than US EPA standards.

- New review process initiated with a revised panel of scientists.

- EPA has set a legal limit of four ppt for PFOA and PFOS, deemed safe.

- WHO's guidelines are influential in establishing global legal limits.

Related

FDA, Industry Actions End Sales of PFAS Used in Food Packaging

FDA, Industry Actions End Sales of PFAS Used in Food Packaging

The FDA discontinues sales of PFAS in food packaging to reduce dietary exposure. Manufacturers commit to removing PFAS from items like fast-food wrappers, enhancing consumer safety and health protection through ongoing research and collaboration.

High Levels of PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Found in Food and Drink Products – Study

High Levels of PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Found in Food and Drink Products – Study

A study on Science Direct found high PFAS levels in food like white rice, eggs, red meat, seafood, and coffee. PFAS in blood and breast milk pose health risks. Dietary changes are advised to reduce exposure. US and EU regulate PFAS in food packaging.

PFAS widely added to US pesticides despite EPA denial, study finds

PFAS widely added to US pesticides despite EPA denial, study finds

A study found toxic PFAS chemicals in US pesticides, contradicting EPA claims. PFAS levels doubled in a decade, linked to health risks. EPA accused of hiding data. Actual PFAS presence may exceed reported levels. Companies not required to disclose PFAS use. EPA silent on findings.

What's the deal with PFAS, a.k.a. 'forever chemicals'?

What's the deal with PFAS, a.k.a. 'forever chemicals'?

PFAS, known as "forever chemicals," pose serious health risks and persist in the environment. The EPA has set new drinking water limits, while experts call for stronger regulations and consumer awareness.

Researchers develop reusable filter that removes 75% of PFAS from water

Researchers develop reusable filter that removes 75% of PFAS from water

Researchers at the University of Bath created a 3D-printed filter that removes up to 75% of PFOA from water, utilizing indium oxide, and is energy-efficient and scalable for water treatment systems.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @OutOfHere - 2 months
The various UN agencies can hardly be trusted anymore to not be extremely corrupt. They are interested in lining their own pockets with funds paid by exploitative governments, corporations, and systems.
By @readthenotes1 - 2 months
It is kind of shocking to find that the who is being held accountable after it's massive failure with covid